rss-digest
Skill0 starsChanged 10 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Digest of the RSS backlog on summary.jdelgado.fr (FreshRSS Summary).
In this repository19 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- addressing-gitlab-review-commentsSkill
- auditing-mobile-layoutSkill
- charting-grafana-metricsSkill
- claude-usage-auditSkill
- confluenceSkill
- gitlab-job-triageSkill
- grafana-cloud-monitoringSkill
- grafana-dashboardsSkill
- handoffSkill
- incident-responseSkill
- jira-cliSkill
- k8s-rightsizingSkill
- mr-openSkill
- pixibixi-wiki-articleSkill
- scoping-a-websiteSkill
- tf-module-releaseSkill
- ticket-conventionsSkill
- wiki-fact-checkSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
1 rule. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈1
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 31
DEV.to / Hacker Moon: keep only items naming our stack explicitly (Thanos, ArgoCD, Terragrunt, GKE, Workload Identity, PromQL, cardinality, …
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
RSS digest
The site is a SPA: WebFetch on the homepage returns nothing useful. Go through the API.
Fetch
SKILL_DIR="${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/scripts"
OUT="<session scratchpad>/rss"
"$SKILL_DIR/fetch.sh" "$OUT" 30 # days, default 30compact.tsv columns: score, feed, date, title, url, summary (300 chars). Sorted by site score, unread only, deduplicated on title. Never Read it whole when it exceeds ~300 lines: filter with rg/awk on the feed or title first.
API (if the script needs changing): GET /api/articles?days=N&limit=0 returns {total, articles[]} with id, title, url, feed_title, published (epoch), score, matched_topics, matched_keywords, top_topic, summary, bookmarked. Shape it server-side rather than with jq: fields=a,b (projection), summary_chars=N (plain text), dedupe=title, min_score, feeds=a,b / exclude_feeds=a,b (exact feed_title), e.g. feeds=Cert%20SSI to pull every advisory regardless of score. Write endpoints (/api/mark-read, /api/bookmark, /api/config/scoring, /api/rescore, /api/snooze) are never called without an explicit ask.
The site score is not the ranking
It is keyword density over matched_topics, blind to source quality. Beginner listicles from DEV.to and Hacker Moon (~90% of volume) float to the top; CERT-FR advisories and vendor CVEs sit at 1-6. Re-rank by hand:
- Security with possible exposure, any score: CERT-FR (
Cert SSI), IT Connect / vBlog CVE posts, Ars security. Keep only products we run: GitLab, Atlassian, Linux kernel/KVM, container runtimes, Docker Hub, ingress/proxies, GCP, Kubernetes. Say whether we are exposed (SaaS = patched by vendor) and mark what was not verified. - Deadlines: Kubernetes or GKE EOL, deprecations, forced upgrades.
- GKE / GCP / FinOps: the
Containers & Kubernetes(Google Cloud blog) feed is the highest-signal source, read all of it. - Engineering deep dives: Meta Engineering, Cloudflare (data pipelines, reliability, observability; skip Workers product launches), Percona only for incident-shaped posts.
- DEV.to / Hacker Moon: keep only items naming our stack explicitly (Thanos, ArgoCD, Terragrunt, GKE, Workload Identity, PromQL, cardinality, FinOps on GCP) and written from production, not tutorials.
Everything else (consumer tech, Apple, politics, beginner Kubernetes, "AI incident agent" series) goes in one closing line.
Profile
Platform/SRE at Equativ (adtech, RTB bidders, high QPS). GCP + GKE fleet (~24 prod clusters), ArgoCD GitOps, Terraform/Terragrunt (iac-*), Prometheus + global Thanos + Grafana Cloud, Tempo, Cloudprober, Aerospike, Dragonfly, GitLab CI, Akamai edge, some OVH bare metal (CDYN/Dynadmic). FinOps-first.
Output
In French. Sections in this order, each a table or short list with a link, the site score and one line of "why it matters here": à traiter (sécu), calendrier, GKE/FinOps, lectures de fond, then one line for the rest. Lead with the backlog size and the source split. Do not mark anything read unless asked.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

