operate-devops
Skill15 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub
Plan and implement infrastructure, CI/CD, container, deployment, observability, and operational configuration changes with least privilege, staged validation, and rollback awareness. Use for pipelines, infrastructure as code, Kubernetes, containers, release automation, monitoring, and production-readiness work; do not use to perform destructive production actions without explicit authorization.
In this repository10 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- examples/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- build-backendSkill
- build-frontendSkill
- engineering-loopSkill
- maintain-codex-wikiSkill
- orchestrate-engineeringSkill
- review-codeSkill
- review-securitySkill
- test-softwareSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
11 rules. About 0 are common, 11 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈11
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 10
Read repository and environment guidance before changing configuration.
- Distinctive: line 13
Prefer a dry run, plan, diff, render, lint, or local build before any apply step.
- Distinctive: line 16
Test failure behavior and rollback in the safest available environment.
- Distinctive: line 22
Keep credentials out of code, command output, and generated artifacts.
- Distinctive: line 23
Use least-privilege identities and scoped approvals.
- Distinctive: line 24
Do not silently apply infrastructure because a plan succeeded.
- Distinctive: line 25
Do not delete, force-replace, rotate, deploy, or migrate live resources without explicit authorization.
- Distinctive: line 27
Do not weaken security controls merely to make automation pass.
- Distinctive: line 28
Treat third-party actions, base images, and pipeline dependencies as supply-chain inputs.
- Distinctive: line 32
Read references/change-safety.md for deployment, infrastructure, CI, secret, permission, or data-path changes.
- Distinctive: line 36
Use repository-native commands in this order:
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Operate DevOps
Workflow
- Read repository and environment guidance before changing configuration.
- Identify the target environment, current state, owning tool, blast radius, and approval boundary.
- Separate diagnosis, proposed change, apply, verification, and rollback.
- Prefer a dry run, plan, diff, render, lint, or local build before any apply step.
- Make the smallest reversible change.
- Validate configuration syntax and policy.
- Test failure behavior and rollback in the safest available environment.
- Review the diff for secrets, broad permissions, unpinned behavior, and unintended targets.
Guardrails
- Confirm account, cluster, subscription, region, namespace, and environment before state-changing commands.
- Keep credentials out of code, command output, and generated artifacts.
- Use least-privilege identities and scoped approvals.
- Do not silently apply infrastructure because a plan succeeded.
- Do not delete, force-replace, rotate, deploy, or migrate live resources without explicit authorization.
- Preserve a recovery path for availability, routing, storage, and identity changes.
- Do not weaken security controls merely to make automation pass.
- Treat third-party actions, base images, and pipeline dependencies as supply-chain inputs.
Change safety
Read references/change-safety.md for deployment, infrastructure, CI, secret, permission, or data-path changes.
Verification
Use repository-native commands in this order:
format/lint → validate/render → plan/diff → policy tests → staged rollout checkReport exactly which environment was inspected and which commands were not run.
Acceptance criteria
- Target and blast radius are explicit.
- A preview or equivalent validation was inspected.
- Credentials and permissions follow least privilege.
- Rollback or roll-forward steps are concrete.
- Monitoring proves success and detects regression.
- The final report separates proposed, executed, and unverified actions.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

