git-commit
Skill4 starsChanged 10 days agoMITView on GitHub
Write and make a git commit. Inspects the changes with git, drafts a short dash-list message in present tense, shows it as plain text for approval, scans staged files for secrets, then commits. Use when the user asks to commit, write a commit message, or save their work to git.
- Reads credentials
- Commits and pushes
174 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- HAOYI99/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- swjybky/deepwritetheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- PC2005-cloud/dsh-pettheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- stuff4ai/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- apattichis/agentic-research-toolkittheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Darna-Digital/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use git-pr, github-pr-create and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
klauswgSkillgit-pr
Prepare, review, publish, or update a complete GitHub pull request for the current repository, including local commit readiness, safe push strategy, semantic title validation, repository-native PR templates, issue linking, and checks verification. Use when the user asks to draft, create, submit, publish, open, or update a pull request. Always require the user to review and explicitly approve the exact final PR before any push or GitHub write.
Also in 11 projects that use this
mjun0812Skillgithub-pr-create
Pull Requestを作成するSkill。現在のbranchからpull requestを作成する。言語指定可能。 ユーザーが「PR作って」「pull request作成して」のように依頼したら使うこと。
Also in 3 projects that use this
MicrosoftSkillgit-branch
Branch management for implementation. Use when you need to create a branch, switch branches, checkout, or verify branching strategy before implementing code. Do not use for commits (use git-commit), pull requests (use pull-request), or advanced git operations (rebase, merge).
Also in 4 projects that use this
klauswgSkillgit-issue
Prepare, review, create, or update evidence-based GitHub issues for the current repository with duplicate detection, repository-native templates, valid labels, and post-publication verification. Use when the user asks to draft, file, submit, publish, edit, or refine a GitHub issue, bug report, feature request, performance issue, or technical proposal. Always require the user to review and explicitly approve the exact final issue before any GitHub write.
Also in 3 projects that use this
gologo13Skillgit-push
Push current branch to origin and sync with remote updates; keywords: git, rebase. Use only on explicit request; before execution, review diffs and list impact scope.
Also in 6 projects that use this
GoogleSkillgithub-pr-review
Review a GitHub pull request and leave inline comments in a natural human reviewing voice, indistinguishable from comments typed by hand on the GitHub web UI. Deliberately bounded to defects a reader can settle by looking at the anchored line, rather than a deep audit, so every comment is cheap for the author to check. Scales to 2-20 comments by PR size, parallelises analysis across sub-agents, drafts for approval, then posts individually with human pacing. Use when the user says "review this PR", "review PR 123", pastes a github.com/.../pull/N link, or asks for comments on a pull request. Don't use for reviewing local uncommitted changes or a diff against a branch (use the `review` skill for that).
Also in 4 projects that use this
Other versions174 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 174
- github/awesome-copilot★ 41ksame name
- doocs/leetcode★ 37ksame name
- tisfeng/Easydict★ 15ksame name
- doocs/md★ 14ksame name
- spinabot/brigade★ 11ksame name
- PC2005-cloud/dsh-pet★ 5.9ksame name
- GitTools/GitVersion★ 3.1ksame name
- igorescodro/alkaa★ 1.6ksame name
- microsoft/hve-core★ 1.6ksame name
- mattmireles/gemma-tuner-multimodal★ 1.5ksame name
164 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository32 other files it gives its agents.
- llms.txtllms.txt
- cve-checkSkill
- dependency-vetSkill
- incident-supply-chainSkill
- migrate-angularjsSkill
- migrate-class-to-hooksSkill
- migrate-cordovaSkill
- migrate-cra-to-viteSkill
- migrate-dotnet-frameworkSkill
- migrate-ingress-nginxSkill
- migrate-strutsSkill
- migrate-vue2Skill
- migrate-xamarinSkill
- secrets-scanSkill
- security-auditSkill
- threat-model-liteSkill
- upgrade-angularSkill
- upgrade-djangoSkill
- upgrade-dotnetSkill
- upgrade-expressSkill
- upgrade-jquerySkill
- upgrade-laravelSkill
- upgrade-nestjsSkill
- upgrade-nextjsSkill
- upgrade-nodeSkill
- upgrade-nuxtSkill
- upgrade-phpSkill
- upgrade-pythonSkill
- upgrade-railsSkill
- upgrade-react-nativeSkill
- upgrade-spring-bootSkill
- upgrade-supabaseSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
13 rules. 0 are common, 7 are distinctive, and 6 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 134 edited versions we read keep these.
7
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
6
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- could be automatic: a setting could enforce it
- Distinctive: line 17
Never commit on your own initiative, even at the end of a task.
- Distinctive: line 21
Check the repo state with git status --short and the current branch with git branch --show-current.
- Distinctive: line 22
If changes are already staged, the commit covers only those.
- Very specific: line 23
Check for a project commit convention (Conventional Commits, commitlint.config.*, a CONTRIBUTING.md section, a commit template).
- Distinctive: line 27
Inspect the changes with git: Read the actual diff, not just file names:
- Distinctive: line 48
Wait for the user to approve or edit it.
- Very specific: line 49
Scan staged files for secrets: if gitleaks is installed (see secrets-scan):
- Very specific: line 55
If it finds anything, stop, tell the user what and where (never the value), and follow secrets-scan.
- Very specific: line 62
If a line contains ", $ or a backtick, wrap that argument in single quotes instead.
- Distinctive: line 73
Never commit without the user's approval of the message.
- Very specific: line 74
Never commit secrets, .env files, private keys or credentials.
- Very specific: line 75
Never use --no-verify, --amend on pushed commits, git commit -a without confirming, or git push, unless the user explicitly asks.
- Distinctive: line 76
Never change git config, hooks or author identity.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 134 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Git commit
When to use
- The user asks you to commit, write a commit message, or "save this to git".
Never commit on your own initiative, even at the end of a task.
Before you start
- Check the repo state with
git status --shortand the current branch withgit branch --show-current. - If changes are already staged, the commit covers only those. If nothing is staged, ask which files to include; never stage unrelated changes or files you didn't touch without asking.
- Check for a project commit convention (Conventional Commits,
commitlint.config.*, aCONTRIBUTING.mdsection, a commit template). If one exists, follow it and keep the dash-list body below the required header. Otherwise use the format below.
Steps
Inspect the changes with git. Read the actual diff, not just file names:
git diff --staged --stat git diff --staged(Use
git difffor unstaged changes the user wants to include, after they confirm.)- Make notes of what changed, grouped by intent rather than by file.
- Draft the message as a dash list, one line per change:
- concise, in present tense ("Add", "Fix", "Remove", not "Added" or "Adds");
- focused on what changed, not how you did it;
- short lines; keep the whole message small. Split unrelated work into separate commits instead of one long message.
Show the message as plain text and ask for approval. Show only the message, not the command:
- Add rate limiting to the login endpoint - Fix the empty-state message on the orders page - Remove the unused date helperWait for the user to approve or edit it.
Scan staged files for secrets if gitleaks is installed (see
secrets-scan):gitleaks git --staged --redact --no-banner -vIf it finds anything, stop, tell the user what and where (never the value), and follow
secrets-scan. If gitleaks isn't installed, check the diff yourself for keys, tokens, passwords,.envfiles and private keys, and say that you did a manual check.Commit with the approved lines, one argument per line:
printf '%s\n' "- Add rate limiting to the login endpoint" "- Fix the empty-state message on the orders page" | git commit -F -If a line contains
",$or a backtick, wrap that argument in single quotes instead. Add any trailer lines the project or tool requires (for exampleCo-Authored-By:) after an empty""argument.- Report the short commit hash and the subject line (
git log --oneline -1).
Verify
git log -1 --format=%Bshows exactly the approved message.git status --shortshows only the changes the user chose to leave uncommitted.- Hooks ran and passed. If a pre-commit hook failed, the commit didn't happen: fix the cause, re-stage, and ask again before retrying.
Safety
- Never commit without the user's approval of the message.
- Never commit secrets,
.envfiles, private keys or credentials. If the user insists, explain that anything committed must be treated as leaked, suggest a secret manager, and let them make that commit themselves. - Never use
--no-verify,--amendon pushed commits,git commit -awithout confirming, orgit push, unless the user explicitly asks. - Never change git config, hooks or author identity.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

