agentleFS
Phaedra-SolutionsPhaedra-Solutions/cursor-rules/skills/git-commit/SKILL.md

git-commit

Skill4 starsChanged 10 days agoMITView on GitHub

Write and make a git commit. Inspects the changes with git, drafts a short dash-list message in present tense, shows it as plain text for approval, scans staged files for secrets, then commits. Use when the user asks to commit, write a commit message, or save their work to git.

  • Reads credentials
  • Commits and pushes

174 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use git-pr, github-pr-create and 10 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • klauswgSkill

    git-pr

    Prepare, review, publish, or update a complete GitHub pull request for the current repository, including local commit readiness, safe push strategy, semantic title validation, repository-native PR templates, issue linking, and checks verification. Use when the user asks to draft, create, submit, publish, open, or update a pull request. Always require the user to review and explicitly approve the exact final PR before any push or GitHub write.

    Also in 11 projects that use this

  • mjun0812Skill

    github-pr-create

    Pull Requestを作成するSkill。現在のbranchからpull requestを作成する。言語指定可能。 ユーザーが「PR作って」「pull request作成して」のように依頼したら使うこと。

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • MicrosoftSkill

    git-branch

    Branch management for implementation. Use when you need to create a branch, switch branches, checkout, or verify branching strategy before implementing code. Do not use for commits (use git-commit), pull requests (use pull-request), or advanced git operations (rebase, merge).

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • klauswgSkill

    git-issue

    Prepare, review, create, or update evidence-based GitHub issues for the current repository with duplicate detection, repository-native templates, valid labels, and post-publication verification. Use when the user asks to draft, file, submit, publish, edit, or refine a GitHub issue, bug report, feature request, performance issue, or technical proposal. Always require the user to review and explicitly approve the exact final issue before any GitHub write.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • gologo13Skill

    git-push

    Push current branch to origin and sync with remote updates; keywords: git, rebase. Use only on explicit request; before execution, review diffs and list impact scope.

    Also in 6 projects that use this

  • GoogleSkill

    github-pr-review

    Review a GitHub pull request and leave inline comments in a natural human reviewing voice, indistinguishable from comments typed by hand on the GitHub web UI. Deliberately bounded to defects a reader can settle by looking at the anchored line, rather than a deep audit, so every comment is cheap for the author to check. Scales to 2-20 comments by PR size, parallelises analysis across sub-agents, drafts for approval, then posts individually with human pacing. Use when the user says "review this PR", "review PR 123", pastes a github.com/.../pull/N link, or asks for comments on a pull request. Don't use for reviewing local uncommitted changes or a diff against a branch (use the `review` skill for that).

    Also in 4 projects that use this

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

13 rules. 0 are common, 7 are distinctive, and 6 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 134 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 7

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 6

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  • could be automatic: a setting could enforce it
  1. Distinctive:

    Never commit on your own initiative, even at the end of a task.

    line 17
  2. Distinctive:

    Check the repo state with git status --short and the current branch with git branch --show-current.

    line 21
  3. Distinctive:

    If changes are already staged, the commit covers only those.

    line 22
  4. Very specific:

    Check for a project commit convention (Conventional Commits, commitlint.config.*, a CONTRIBUTING.md section, a commit template).

    line 23
  5. Distinctive:

    Inspect the changes with git: Read the actual diff, not just file names:

    line 27
  6. Distinctive:

    Wait for the user to approve or edit it.

    line 48
  7. Very specific:

    Scan staged files for secrets: if gitleaks is installed (see secrets-scan):

    line 49
  8. Very specific:

    If it finds anything, stop, tell the user what and where (never the value), and follow secrets-scan.

    line 55
  9. Very specific:

    If a line contains ", $ or a backtick, wrap that argument in single quotes instead.

    line 62
  10. Distinctive:

    Never commit without the user's approval of the message.

    line 73
  11. Very specific:

    Never commit secrets, .env files, private keys or credentials.

    line 74
  12. Very specific:

    Never use --no-verify, --amend on pushed commits, git commit -a without confirming, or git push, unless the user explicitly asks.

    line 75
  13. Distinctive:

    Never change git config, hooks or author identity.

    line 76

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 134 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Git commit

When to use

  • The user asks you to commit, write a commit message, or "save this to git".

Never commit on your own initiative, even at the end of a task.

Before you start

  • Check the repo state with git status --short and the current branch with git branch --show-current.
  • If changes are already staged, the commit covers only those. If nothing is staged, ask which files to include; never stage unrelated changes or files you didn't touch without asking.
  • Check for a project commit convention (Conventional Commits, commitlint.config.*, a CONTRIBUTING.md section, a commit template). If one exists, follow it and keep the dash-list body below the required header. Otherwise use the format below.

Steps

  1. Inspect the changes with git. Read the actual diff, not just file names:

    git diff --staged --stat
    git diff --staged

    (Use git diff for unstaged changes the user wants to include, after they confirm.)

  2. Make notes of what changed, grouped by intent rather than by file.
  3. Draft the message as a dash list, one line per change:
    • concise, in present tense ("Add", "Fix", "Remove", not "Added" or "Adds");
    • focused on what changed, not how you did it;
    • short lines; keep the whole message small. Split unrelated work into separate commits instead of one long message.
  4. Show the message as plain text and ask for approval. Show only the message, not the command:

    - Add rate limiting to the login endpoint
    - Fix the empty-state message on the orders page
    - Remove the unused date helper

    Wait for the user to approve or edit it.

  5. Scan staged files for secrets if gitleaks is installed (see secrets-scan):

    gitleaks git --staged --redact --no-banner -v

    If it finds anything, stop, tell the user what and where (never the value), and follow secrets-scan. If gitleaks isn't installed, check the diff yourself for keys, tokens, passwords, .env files and private keys, and say that you did a manual check.

  6. Commit with the approved lines, one argument per line:

    printf '%s\n' "- Add rate limiting to the login endpoint" "- Fix the empty-state message on the orders page" | git commit -F -

    If a line contains ", $ or a backtick, wrap that argument in single quotes instead. Add any trailer lines the project or tool requires (for example Co-Authored-By:) after an empty "" argument.

  7. Report the short commit hash and the subject line (git log --oneline -1).

Verify

  • git log -1 --format=%B shows exactly the approved message.
  • git status --short shows only the changes the user chose to leave uncommitted.
  • Hooks ran and passed. If a pre-commit hook failed, the commit didn't happen: fix the cause, re-stage, and ask again before retrying.

Safety

  • Never commit without the user's approval of the message.
  • Never commit secrets, .env files, private keys or credentials. If the user insists, explain that anything committed must be treated as leaked, suggest a secret manager, and let them make that commit themselves.
  • Never use --no-verify, --amend on pushed commits, git commit -a without confirming, or git push, unless the user explicitly asks.
  • Never change git config, hooks or author identity.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.