citation-audit
Skill0 starsChanged 5 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Verify that every citation exists, that its metadata is right, that it is not retracted, and export it in the required style.
10 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- Mathews-Tom/armorytheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- kurtvalcorza/citation-audittheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- khadinakbarlabs/vibelocaltheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- talhaMah56/claude_skillstheir own version, first seen Sep 12, 2026
- wanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleeptheir own version, first seen Jul 15, 2026
- tansuasici/claude-research-kittheir own version, first seen Jun 2, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use figure-spec, comm-lit-review-claude-single and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
raja21068Skillfigure-spec
Generate deterministic publication-quality architecture, workflow, and pipeline diagrams from structured JSON (FigureSpec) into editable SVG. Use when user says \"架构图\", \"workflow 图\", \"pipeline 图\", \"确定性矢量图\", \"figure spec\", \"draw architecture\", or needs precise, editable, publication-ready vector diagrams. Preferred over AI illustration for formal architecture/workflow figures.
Also in 4 projects that use this
raja21068Skillcomm-lit-review-claude-single
Communications-domain literature review with Claude-style knowledge-base-first retrieval. Use when the task is about communications, wireless, networking, satellite/NTN, Wi-Fi, cellular, transport protocols, congestion control, routing, scheduling, MAC/PHY, rate adaptation, channel estimation, beamforming, or communication-system research and the user wants papers, related work, a survey, or a landscape summary. Search Zotero, Obsidian, and local paper folders first when available, then search IEEE Xplore, ScienceDirect, ACM Digital Library, and broader web in that order.
Also in 3 projects that use this
rongaredeSkillsemantic-scholar
使用 Semantic Scholar API 检索和验证学术论文。支持并发多关键词搜索、批量 ID/DOI 查询、引用分析、批量补全摘要、统一 Markdown 导出。覆盖 2.14 亿+ 学术论文,无需 API Key 即可使用。触发词:论文检索、论文验证、Semantic Scholar、S2 搜索、查论文、补全摘要、导出MD
Also in 4 projects that use this
Yusong-EnceladusSkillfeishu-notify
Send notifications to Feishu/Lark. Internal utility used by other skills, or manually via /feishu-notify. Supports push-only (webhook) and interactive (bidirectional) modes. Use when user says \"发飞书\", \"notify feishu\", or other skills need to send status updates.
Also in 3 projects that use this
- +8 more from raja21068
Other versions10 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 10
- wanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep★ 19ksame name
- Mathews-Tom/armory★ 340same name
- Chanw-research/claude-code-paper-writing★ 42same name
- catalsqlb-cmd/Prism-H★ 16same name
- seandavi/scriptorium★ 5same name
- tansuasici/claude-research-kit★ 4same name
- raja21068/AutoResearch★ 2same name
- khadinakbarlabs/vibelocal★ 0same name
- kurtvalcorza/citation-audit★ 0same name
- talhaMah56/claude_skills★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository6 other files it gives its agents.
- claim-evidence-auditSkill
- data-management-planSkill
- literature-reviewSkill
- manuscript-preflightSkill
- reproducibility-auditSkill
- reviewer-responseSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 10 edited versions we read keep these.
2
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 19
Run retraction_watch on the resolved DOIs.
- Very specific: line 20
Use cite_fix for a corrected BibTeX entry — text only, never edit the file silently.
- Distinctive: line 33
Do not "fix" a DOI by guessing a nearby one.
- Distinctive: line 34
Do not treat a network failure as a clean citation.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 10 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Citation audit
Rules
not_foundis a skipped check, never proof of fabrication.- Metadata checks are field-by-field: DOI, title, authors, year, venue, pages.
- Retraction status is a separate lookup, not a guess from the title.
Steps
- For each reference run
cite_verifywithdoi/pmid/arxiv/bibtex. - Batch with
cite_batchwhen the list is long; read everystatus,lookupError,duplicate. - Run
retraction_watchon the resolved DOIs;clearmeans no registered notice, not "valid". - Use
cite_fixfor a corrected BibTeX entry — text only, never edit the file silently. - Export with
cite_export(gbt7714-numeric,apa,ieee,vancouver,bibtex,ris,csl-json); reportmissing[]fields. - Store the provider answers as REP evidence; cite the evidence ids in the audit summary.
Output
- Per-reference verdict with the failing field.
- Retraction status per DOI with the lookup date.
- Export text + missing fields.
- A count of verified / warn / unchecked / not-found.
Never
- Do not "fix" a DOI by guessing a nearby one.
- Do not treat a network failure as a clean citation.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

