Archetype-talk
AGENTS.md2 starsChanged 47 days agoMITView on GitHub
This file is the cross-tool entry point (the open AGENTS.md convention, read by OpenAI Codex, Google Antigravity, and others). It works alongside Claude Code, Gemini CLI, or plain VS Code with any agent extension. The complete working rules live in CLAUDE.md — read it first. Despite the name it is not Claude-specific; every rule there (grounding, Levels, Signals vs Evidence, never inventing quotes/stats, link approval, demo-data isolation) applies to you, whichever agent you are. Most VS Code agents (Cline, Roo…
Where files are headingNew AGENTS.md files have more rules about keeping secrets out of the code, and fewer about code style.
Of the AGENTS.md files we read, the 31,700 first seen in the last six months, against the older ones: the kind of rule that gained most share, and the kind that lost most. About files like this in general, not this one, and an estimate, since a kind is a pattern in the words.
In this repository31 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- .github/copilot-instructions.mdCopilot instructions
- affinitySkill
- ai-personaSkill
- analytics-syncSkill
- backlogSkill
- catalogSkill
- cold-startSkill
- contradictionsSkill
- demo-dataSkill
- dovetail-syncSkill
- exportSkill
- extract-findingsSkill
- feature-panelSkill
- forget-participantSkill
- graph-lintSkill
- interview-guideSkill
- journey-mapSkill
- opportunity-treeSkill
- persona-avatarSkill
- persona-querySkill
- persona-talkSkill
- persona-voiceSkill
- persona-workshopSkill
- prdSkill
- prioritizeSkill
- researcherSkill
- retentionSkill
- source-syncSkill
- subject-accessSkill
- welcomeSkill
The file
We split this AGENTS.md into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈1
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
3
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 126
no onboarding marker (.claude/onboarded.local) → run the welcome skill.
- Very specific: line 140
Read/edit only the matching app/src/css/NN-*.css or app/src/js/NN-*.js partial (plus app/src/shell.html for page structure).
- Very specific: line 143
After changing demo: true content: python3 scripts/embed_demo.py (embeds demo files only — real research never ships in the app).
- Distinctive: line 177
Commit locally with clear messages.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 40,246 AGENTS.md files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
AGENTS.md — guide for any AI agent working in this repo
This file is the cross-tool entry point (the open AGENTS.md convention, read by OpenAI Codex, Google Antigravity, and others). It works alongside Claude Code, Gemini CLI, or plain VS Code with any agent extension.
The complete working rules live in CLAUDE.md — read it first. Despite the name it is not Claude-specific; every rule there (grounding, Levels, Signals vs Evidence, never inventing quotes/stats, link approval, demo-data isolation) applies to you, whichever agent you are.
Start of session — paste this if your agent never loaded this file
Most VS Code agents (Cline, Roo Code, Continue, Copilot, Qwen Code…) auto-read
only their own rules file, and several stop at the .claude/ folder name and
conclude that none of it is meant for them. It is: the name is historical, not a
scope. Thin pointers to this file now sit in .github/copilot-instructions.md,
.clinerules, .roorules and .cursorrules. If your tool reads none of those,
paste this as your first message:
Read
AGENTS.md, thenCLAUDE.md, then.claude/skills/INDEX.md. Those rules apply to you whichever model you are — the.claude/name is historical, not a scope. Then checkInbox/for unprocessed files and tell me what you found. Never readapp/index.htmlorapp/src/embedded-graph.html— they are generated.
What this repo is
Archetype Talk — a UX-research knowledge graph you can talk to. Shape:
Evidence → Signal → (Persona ↔ Archetype) → Idea, with Hypothesis as the
ungrounded waiting room. One entity per Markdown file, one folder per type. Full
map: README.md.
Which project you are in — read this before your first answer
project_name: in Product Context.md names the project
this repo is for, and that file is its brief. The entity folders hold two
sets side by side: that project's files, and a bundled Spotify example set
marked demo: true. Nothing but that flag separates them.
So: treat every demo: true file as out of scope — not read, not grepped, not
counted, not named in an answer — unless the user asks about the demo itself.
Offering a demo persona next to the user's own, or calling a repo empty because
the real files were filtered out, is the failure this paragraph exists to
prevent. .claude/cache/graph-index.md lists the
two sets separately and names the active project on its project: line.
Where things live
Nothing here is a source you cite — it is routing, so you open the two files a task needs instead of grepping for them. Cite the underlying entity file.
| Open this | For | When |
| CLAUDE.md | the complete ruleset — grounding, Levels, Signal vs Evidence, data lifecycle, link approval | first, every session, whichever agent you are |
| .claude/skills/INDEX.md | every skill, one line each, what triggers it | before starting any task — it tells you which SKILL.md to open |
.claude/skills/<name>/SKILL.md | the full procedure for one workflow, plus its own rules | when a task matches an INDEX row. Its references/ only when the skill says that mode activated |
| .claude/cache/graph-index.md | type, path, flags and links of every entity | before opening research files, to pick which. Never cite it |
<Folder>/_template.md | required frontmatter and section shape for that entity type | before creating or editing any entity |
| Product Context.md | what the product actually does | when the work touches features |
| Research backlog.md | open research questions, with priorities | when proposing what to ask real users |
| Participants.md | who was interviewed, and in which session | when you need sample stats or heard-from counts |
| README.md | the human-facing overview | for orientation — the rules are in CLAUDE.md, not here |
| app/src/README.md | which app partial holds which component | before touching anything under app/ |
Three folder-level homes you would not guess: competitors —
needs_research:, mentioned_in:, proximity: and the comparison axes are in
Competitors/README.md, not in a template.
Persona avatars — consent rule, the generate-and-review procedure, and why
picture: must never hold an http(s) value are in
Personas/avatars/README.md; read it before making a
face for anyone (photorealistic alternatives, licences and sizing:
Personas/photos/README.md).
And docs/, which nothing else links to:
| Open this | For |
| docs/DATA-BOUNDARY.md | where the data physically lives, and what leaves the machine |
| docs/SECRETS.md | where keys live and where they must never be written |
| docs/AUTOMATION.md | what runs by itself — hooks, scripts, schedules |
| docs/BUILD.md | reproducing the shipped app |
| docs/ACCESS-AND-AUDIT.md | working as a team, who changed what |
| docs/ACCESSIBILITY.md | the accessibility statement |
| docs/SUPPORT.md | what is maintained and what you can rely on |
Answer questions about storage, keys, automation or the build from these files, never from a guess about how such a repo usually works.
Running the workflows when you're not Claude Code
The .claude/skills/<name>/SKILL.md files are plain instructions in the open
Agent Skills format. .agents/skills/ is a link to the
same folder, so skill-aware agents load them natively: Claude Code, Copilot and
Cursor as slash-commands (/persona-talk), Codex as $persona-talk, Gemini CLI
by activating the skill when a task matches it. If your agent does not list
them — or .agents/skills came out as a plain file on a Windows checkout —
open the matching SKILL.md and follow its steps directly. Same result.
Start from .claude/skills/INDEX.md — one table, every
skill, what triggers it. It exists so you don't have to read the 18 KB README to
find out which file to open. A skill's references/ are loaded only when the
skill says that mode activated, never upfront.
Follow a skill silently — never narrate it. A SKILL.md is a procedure you
execute, not a document you think out loud about. The user gets the result in
the format that skill defines; they never get your plan, your step numbers, your
reading list, or a summary of what a file contained before you use it. This bites
hardest in VS Code custom modes and local reasoning models, which emit
<think>/<reasoning> tags as plain text that the client doesn't strip — in
persona-talk a leaked block reads as the persona's cheat sheet printed above her
own answer, and the interview is over. If your runtime can't hide the tags, keep
what's inside them to a few words.
Then read .claude/cache/graph-index.md before
opening research files — a one-read map of every entity (type, path, flags, links)
that tells you which files matter. Generate it with python3
scripts/graph_index.py build; Claude Code's SessionStart hook does that
automatically, and your agent probably doesn't. It is a routing map, never a
source — never cite it, and read the actual file for anything you quote.
Some behaviors are wired as a Claude Code SessionStart hook
(.claude/hooks/check-inbox.sh) that only prints reminders. If your agent
doesn't run hooks, reproduce the check yourself at the start of a session:
- unprocessed files in
Inbox/→ offer to runextract-findings(never auto-run); Competitors/*.mdwithneeds_research: true→ ask before desk research, offering a 1/2/3-year lookback window;- no onboarding marker (
.claude/onboarded.local) → run thewelcomeskill; - the session's first message is a bare greeting ("hi", "cześć", "hello") with no request attached → don't answer with a bare greeting back. Say in one or two sentences what this repo is — Archetype Talk, a UX-research knowledge graph you can talk to (README.md) — and then ask what they want to do. Naming the folder you are sitting in is not the same as knowing what it holds.
Editing the browser app (app/)
Never read or edit app/index.html or app/src/embedded-graph.html — they
are 300 KB+ generated build artifacts (reading them wastes huge context). The app
is edited as partials:
- Grep app/src/README.md — the component map — first.
- Read/edit only the matching
app/src/css/NN-*.cssorapp/src/js/NN-*.jspartial (plusapp/src/shell.htmlfor page structure). - Rebuild:
python3 scripts/build_app.py. - After changing
demo: truecontent:python3 scripts/embed_demo.py(embeds demo files only — real research never ships in the app).
Reusable content components (no packages, pure Markdown)
Detail pages render four visual components from fenced blocks whose info string names the type. Use them when a claim scans better as a visual than a sentence (market share, key stats, comparison ratings, history) — but only when the data supports it; an honest gap beats a decorative chart. Full spec in app/src/README.md.
```bar ```stat ```rating ```timeline
Spotify: 31% 100M+ | Subscribers | Q2 2025 Catalog: 5/5 2015: Launched
Apple: 15% #2 | Market rank | 2025 Voice: 3/5 2025: 100M subs
``` ``` ``` ```Inline source citations
Type [S1], [S2] … in prose to drop a clickable superscript chip that jumps to
the matching item in that page's ## Sources list (1-indexed). Keep sources as a
list under a ## Sources heading. No other syntax — this stays editable by hand.
GDPR / anonymization (do not skip)
Sending a raw transcript to an LLM to be scrubbed already processes personal data
(GDPR Art. 4(2)). Prefer a local pre-scrub (e.g. Microsoft Presidio) or a
manual redaction before text reaches any model; the extract-findings Step-0
PII pass is a safety net, not a substitute. Details:
README.md.
Git
Commit locally with clear messages; push only when the user explicitly asks.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

