yeet
Skill6 starsChanged 6 days agoMITView on GitHub
This skill is coordination-exempt: skip the ai-coord gate for its declared work. Create or update GitHub contributions from repository evidence, using the matching workflow's templates, idempotency rules, and Paul's writing voice. Use the first required read-only gh command in each workflow to validate authentication. Resolve <skill-dir> once to the absolute directory containing this SKILL.md. This skill, rather than the target repository, bundles the yeet-context.sh helper. Invoke it as <skill-dir>/scripts/yeet-context.sh. Never search for it in the target repository. Prefer the helper…
15 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- TidalPaladin/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- PaulRBerg/agent-skillsword for word, first seen Oct 24, 2026
- kriegcloud/beep-effecttheir own version, first seen Oct 8, 2026
- davidsolheim/skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 5, 2026
- leaf76/agent-skillstheir own version, first seen Aug 17, 2026
- Adhamxon/claude-code-skillstheir own version, first seen Jul 30, 2026
Other versions15 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 1
- PaulRBerg/agent-skills★ 104100% same
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 14
- openai/skills★ 27ksame name
- JetBrains/skills★ 386same name
- kriegcloud/beep-effect★ 78same name
- EnzeD/skills★ 9same name
- Adhamxon/claude-code-skills★ 2same name
- davidsolheim/skills★ 1same name
- FuSheng-MG/Pi-Agent-skills★ 1same name
- lyh843/AgentSkills★ 1same name
- misty-step/laboratory★ 1same name
- TidalPaladin/skills★ 1same name
4 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository44 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- agents-brainSkill
- agents-docsSkill
- agents-introspectionSkill
- agents-systemSkill
- ai-pruneSkill
- apple-device-integrationSkill
- brainstorm-with-meSkill
- chromium-browserSkill
- cli-castSkill
- cli-coingeckoSkill
- cli-ghSkill
- cli-justSkill
- codebase-designSkill
- code-polishSkill
- commitSkill
- copy-transcript-pathSkill
- effect-tsSkill
- evm-atlasSkill
- fresh-eyes-sweepSkill
- frontend-designSkill
- grill-meSkill
- html-playgroundSkill
- interview-meSkill
- large-file-refactorSkill
- naming-refactorSkill
- node-deps-bumperSkill
- orchestrationSkill
- pdfSkill
- release-bumperSkill
- repo-fanoutSkill
- repo-harmonizationSkill
- repo-renameSkill
- retroSkill
- skill-harmonizationSkill
- social-mediaSkill
- spreadsheetsSkill
- tailwind-cssSkill
- task-handoffSkill
- todo-archiveSkill
- tool-finderSkill
- vitestSkill
- wrap-upSkill
- writing-editorSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
7 rules. 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 5 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 14 edited versions we read keep these.
2
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
5
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 20
Create or update GitHub contributions from repository evidence, using the matching workflow's templates, idempotency rules, and Paul's …
- Very specific: line 25
Use the first required read-only gh command in each workflow to validate authentication.
- Very specific: line 35
All issue creation and update workflows apply references/context.md > Issue Metadata Permissions before resolving or passing metadata.
- Very specific: line 44
Use cli-gh for GitHub reads, workflow automation, or command syntax that is not part of authoring and posting a contribution.
- Distinctive: line 71
Never check an external template attestation unless repository or user evidence verifies it.
- Very specific: line 82
Use ### 🚀 <artifact> created, ### ✅ <artifact> updated, ### ✅ Comment posted, or ### ✅ Comment updated, followed by one Markdown link …
- Very specific: line 87
Use ### ⛔ <artifact> not <action> only for confirmed noncompletion.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 14 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
GitHub Contribution Workflows
This skill is coordination-exempt: skip the ai-coord gate for its declared work.
Create or update GitHub contributions from repository evidence, using the matching workflow's templates, idempotency rules, and Paul's writing voice.
Prerequisites
Use the first required read-only gh command in each workflow to validate authentication. Resolve <skill-dir> once to
the absolute directory containing this SKILL.md.
This skill, rather than the target repository, bundles the yeet-context.sh helper. Invoke it as
<skill-dir>/scripts/yeet-context.sh. Never search for it in the target repository. Prefer the helper when the workflow
needs repository, template, discussion, label, or issue/PR thread context.
For YAML issue forms, invoke <skill-dir>/scripts/issue-form.py. inspect fetches and normalizes the selected live
form. render validates answers keyed by field ID and produces the exact Markdown body plus posting metadata. The
helper never selects a template, writes answers or titles, performs an external-disclosure review, or posts externally.
All issue creation and update workflows apply references/context.md > Issue Metadata Permissions before resolving or
passing metadata. Rendered template metadata describes requested values, not the viewer's authority to apply them.
For pull request workflows, also verify:
- Working tree is clean or changes are committed
- Current branch has commits ahead of the base branch
- Remote tracking is configured
Use cli-gh for GitHub reads, workflow automation, or command syntax that is not part of authoring and posting a
contribution.
Workflows
Each workflow is fully documented in its reference file. Load the appropriate reference based on user intent. Then read
the shared reference sections that the workflow names (posting.md, writing.md, context.md) in one parallel batch.
| Workflow | Trigger | Reference |
| Create PR | "create PR", "open PR", "yeet a PR" | references/create-pr.md |
| Update PR | "update PR", "edit PR" | references/update-pr.md |
| Create Issue | "create issue", "file issue" (generic repo) | references/create-issue.md |
| Update Issue | "update issue", "edit issue", "relabel issue" | references/update-issue.md |
| Claude Code Issue | "Claude Code issue", "report bug in CC" | references/issue-claude-code.md |
| Codex CLI Issue | "Codex issue", "report bug in Codex" | references/issue-codex-cli.md |
| Sablier Issue | "Sablier issue", "sablier-labs issue" | references/issue-sablier.md |
| Comment on Issue | "comment on issue", "reply on issue", "post a comment" | references/comment-issue.md |
| Create Discussion | "create discussion", "start discussion" | references/create-discussion.md |
| Update Discussion | "update discussion", "edit discussion" | references/update-discussion.md |
| Comment Discussion | "comment on discussion", "reply on discussion", "edit discussion comment" | references/comment-discussion.md |
Each workflow reference links only the shared context, writing, or posting guidance it needs. Every authored body or comment must follow posting.md > Model Co-signature. When the user requested creation or update, post directly. Do not add a confirmation gate. After a failed write, run the linked idempotency check before any retry.
Never check an external template attestation unless repository or user evidence verifies it. If a required attestation or field cannot be verified, ask for that missing fact rather than inventing agreement. Agent-status decoration belongs outside the authored contribution. Add emoji to a PR, issue, discussion, or comment only when the user's content or the thread's register calls for it.
Completion
The workflow is complete when the requested contribution exists in its final authored state and the returned GitHub URL is verified. For updates/comments, report the changed artifact once. Determine the outcome from readback, not the command's exit status: creation can succeed before a metadata mutation fails.
Use ### 🚀 <artifact> created, ### ✅ <artifact> updated, ### ✅ Comment posted, or ### ✅ Comment updated,
followed by one Markdown link containing the repository, number, and title or action. Add a compact field list only when
base, draft state, reviewers, labels, or changed fields matter. For verified partial success, report the created or
updated artifact and identify omitted or failed metadata.
Use ### ⛔ <artifact> not <action> only for confirmed noncompletion. If readback is inconclusive, report the outcome
as unverified. Include the concrete error, idempotency result, and next action. Keep gh output, JSON, diagnostics,
template fields, URLs, and authored contribution text exact and undecorated.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

