agentleFS
PaulKinlanPaulKinlan/Co-do/.claude/skills/fix-pr-comments/SKILL.md

fix-pr-comments

Skill78 starsChanged 9 months agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

Fix all comments from the GitHub pull request for the current branch. Fetches PR review comments and addresses each issue raised by reviewers.

8 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use commit and frontend-design.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • SentrySkill

    commit

    Create commit messages following Sentry conventions. Use when committing code changes, writing commit messages, or formatting git history. Follows conventional commits with Sentry-specific issue references.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • BlockSkill

    frontend-design

    Create distinctive, production-grade frontend interfaces with high design quality. Use this skill when the user asks to build web components, pages, or applications. Generates creative, polished code that avoids generic AI aesthetics.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

19 rules. 0 are common, 19 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 8 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 19

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  • could be automatic: a setting could enforce it
  1. Distinctive:

    Run these commands to get the current branch and find the associated PR:

    line 33
  2. Distinctive:

    If there's no PR for the current branch, inform the user and stop.

    line 43
  3. Distinctive:

    Use TodoWrite to create a task list with all the issues to fix:

    line 66
  4. Distinctive:

    Create a todo item for each actionable comment

    line 69
  5. Distinctive:

    Read the relevant file(s) mentioned in the comment

    line 83
  6. Distinctive:

    After fixing all issues, run the project's test suite:

    line 90
  7. Distinctive:

    After completing all fixes, provide a summary:

    line 100
  8. Distinctive:

    Read before editing: Always read the file context before making changes

    line 107
  9. Distinctive:

    Preserve intent: Make sure fixes align with the overall code style and architecture

    line 108
  10. Distinctive:

    Test everything: Run tests after each significant change

    line 109
  11. Distinctive:

    Document lessons: If a comment reveals a pattern issue, consider updating CLAUDE.md

    line 110
  12. Distinctive:

    Don't over-fix: Only address what the reviewer asked for, don't refactor unrelated code

    line 111
  13. Distinctive:

    If a comment is unclear or could be interpreted multiple ways:

    line 115
  14. Distinctive:

    Look at the surrounding code context

    line 116
  15. Distinctive:

    Check if there are follow-up comments clarifying the issue

    line 117
  16. Distinctive:

    If still unclear, note it in the summary as needing human clarification

    line 118
  17. Distinctive:

    Create focused commits for each logical fix

    line 122
  18. Distinctive:

    Use clear commit messages referencing the review comment

    line 123
  19. Distinctive:

    Don't force push or rebase without user permission

    line 124

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 8 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Fix PR Comments

You are a PR review comment resolver. Your job is to find and fix all outstanding review comments on the current pull request.

Workflow

Step 1: Identify the Current Branch and PR

Run these commands to get the current branch and find the associated PR:

# Get current branch name
git branch --show-current

# Get PR number and details for this branch
gh pr view --json number,title,url,reviewDecision,state

If there's no PR for the current branch, inform the user and stop.

Step 2: Fetch All Review Comments

Get all review comments on the PR:

# Get all review comments (these are inline code comments)
gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{pr_number}/comments --jq '.[] | {id: .id, path: .path, line: .line, body: .body, user: .user.login, created_at: .created_at}'

# Get all PR review threads to see which are resolved
gh pr view {pr_number} --json reviewThreads

Also check for general PR comments:

# Get issue-style comments on the PR
gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues/{pr_number}/comments --jq '.[] | {id: .id, body: .body, user: .user.login, created_at: .created_at}'

Step 3: Create a Todo List

Use TodoWrite to create a task list with all the issues to fix:

  1. Parse each comment to understand what needs to be fixed
  2. Create a todo item for each actionable comment
  3. Group related comments if they're about the same issue

Skip comments that are:

  • Questions that have been answered
  • Already resolved threads
  • Pure discussion without action items
  • Approval messages like "LGTM"

Step 4: Fix Each Issue

For each comment:

  1. Mark the todo as in_progress
  2. Read the relevant file(s) mentioned in the comment
  3. Understand the reviewer's concern
  4. Make the necessary fix
  5. Mark the todo as completed

Step 5: Run Tests

After fixing all issues, run the project's test suite:

npm test

Fix any test failures that result from your changes.

Step 6: Summary

After completing all fixes, provide a summary:

  • List of comments addressed
  • Files modified
  • Any comments that couldn't be automatically fixed (require discussion)

Important Notes

  • Read before editing: Always read the file context before making changes
  • Preserve intent: Make sure fixes align with the overall code style and architecture
  • Test everything: Run tests after each significant change
  • Document lessons: If a comment reveals a pattern issue, consider updating CLAUDE.md
  • Don't over-fix: Only address what the reviewer asked for, don't refactor unrelated code

Handling Ambiguous Comments

If a comment is unclear or could be interpreted multiple ways:

  1. Look at the surrounding code context
  2. Check if there are follow-up comments clarifying the issue
  3. If still unclear, note it in the summary as needing human clarification

Git Etiquette

  • Create focused commits for each logical fix
  • Use clear commit messages referencing the review comment
  • Don't force push or rebase without user permission

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.