liquefy-openclaw
Skill22 starsChanged 40 days agoMITView on GitHub
Use this skill when working with Liquefy around OpenClaw, including workspace scan/pack flows, policy explanation, search/restore, guarded runs, context gate, replay blocking, native hook integration, session vaulting, and state/history guard workflows.
In this repository7 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- context-capsuleSkill
- liquefy-archiveSkill
- liquefy-token-guardSkill
- parad0x-mcp-serverSkill
- openclaw-x402-gateSkill
- openclaw-x402-paySkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
25 rules. About 0 are common, 14 are distinctive, and 11 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈14
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
11
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 19
Use this skill when the user wants to:
- Distinctive: line 22
search or restore from an existing Liquefy vault
- Distinctive: line 23
run OpenClaw with rollback, context budgeting, replay blocking, or restore-on-failure
- Distinctive: line 30
Default to the local Liquefy CLI:
- Very specific: line 44
if the user already has the OpenClaw plugin installed, liquefy_scan and liquefy_pack_apply are available
- Distinctive: line 45
do not assume those plugin tools exist in a standalone skill install
- Distinctive: line 49
Before using repo-relative tools or plugin commands:
- Very specific: line 50
verify liquefy is installed and callable
- Very specific: line 51
verify repo-relative tools/ paths exist before using python tools/...
- Distinctive: line 52
verify optional plugin tools exist before using them
- Very specific: line 53
verify LIQUEFY_SECRET is set before any secure pack/apply flow
- Very specific: line 54
prefer --json for commands that support it when machine-readable results matter
- Distinctive: line 56
If a required command, repo path, or dependency is missing:
- Distinctive: line 57
stop and explain the missing dependency
- Distinctive: line 58
do not guess alternate commands
- Distinctive: line 59
do not pretend plugin or repo-only surfaces are available
- Very specific: line 63
check liquefy version --json and liquefy openclaw --version --json before relying on newer flags
- Very specific: line 64
if the optional OpenClaw plugin is used, it expects Liquefy OpenClaw CLI >= 1.1.0
- Distinctive: line 68
Prefer read-only scan before any write/apply action.
- Very specific: line 69
Do not ask for --include-secrets or risky allow-category overrides unless the user explicitly wants denied paths included.
- Very specific: line 70
If the user asks for protection on the next OpenClaw run, do not use raw openclaw run.
- Very specific: line 71
If context-gate reports blocked=true, stop and explain block_reason instead of trying to route around it.
- Very specific: line 72
If secure pack/apply is requested, ensure LIQUEFY_SECRET exists before enabling --secure.
- Distinctive: line 73
Do not pretend the standalone skill install also installed the plugin package.
- Distinctive: line 74
Do not run pack, apply, restore, hook install/uninstall, or other write-affecting operations unless the user explicitly requested that …
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Liquefy OpenClaw
Data handling (v0.1.1): All input values are passed through an inline vault-scan gate (ported from
tools/liquefy_redact.py) before reaching the Liquefy CLI. The gate strips API keys, tokens, credentials, PII, and card numbers, replacing them with typed placeholders. No matched values are logged. Workspace files are processed locally; nothing is transmitted externally.
Use this skill when the user wants to:
- scan or pack an OpenClaw workspace with Liquefy
- understand why Liquefy denied a path
- search or restore from an existing Liquefy vault
- run OpenClaw with rollback, context budgeting, replay blocking, or restore-on-failure
- install or inspect native Liquefy integration inside OpenClaw
- vault OpenClaw session/state directories
- protect OpenClaw state or pulled history before risky actions
Start Here
Default to the local Liquefy CLI:
liquefy openclaw --jsonliquefy openclaw run --jsonliquefy searchliquefy restoreliquefy safe-run --jsonliquefy context-gate compile --jsonliquefy context-gate history --jsonpython tools/openclaw_tracevault.pypython tools/liquefy_openclaw_plugin.py hook install|uninstall|statusliquefy state-guard ...liquefy history-guard ...
Optional packaged plugin path:
- if the user already has the OpenClaw plugin installed,
liquefy_scanandliquefy_pack_applyare available - do not assume those plugin tools exist in a standalone skill install
Preflight
Before using repo-relative tools or plugin commands:
- verify
liquefyis installed and callable - verify repo-relative
tools/paths exist before usingpython tools/... - verify optional plugin tools exist before using them
- verify
LIQUEFY_SECRETis set before any secure pack/apply flow - prefer
--jsonfor commands that support it when machine-readable results matter
If a required command, repo path, or dependency is missing:
- stop and explain the missing dependency
- do not guess alternate commands
- do not pretend plugin or repo-only surfaces are available
Compatibility note:
- this standalone skill is aligned to the Liquefy OpenClaw command surface currently shipped in this repo
- check
liquefy version --jsonandliquefy openclaw --version --jsonbefore relying on newer flags - if the optional OpenClaw plugin is used, it expects Liquefy OpenClaw CLI
>= 1.1.0
Hard Rules
- Prefer read-only scan before any write/apply action.
- Do not ask for
--include-secretsor risky allow-category overrides unless the user explicitly wants denied paths included. - If the user asks for protection on the next OpenClaw run, do not use raw
openclaw run; preferliquefy openclaw runorliquefy safe-run. - If
context-gatereportsblocked=true, stop and explainblock_reasoninstead of trying to route around it. - If secure pack/apply is requested, ensure
LIQUEFY_SECRETexists before enabling--secure. - Do not pretend the standalone skill install also installed the plugin package. Treat plugin tools as optional.
- Do not run pack, apply, restore, hook install/uninstall, or other write-affecting operations unless the user explicitly requested that action after review.
References
- For workflow selection and commands, read references/workflows.md.
- For install/update truth, standalone vs plugin split, and trust posture, read references/integration.md.
- For JSON contracts and stable machine-readable fields, read references/contracts.md.
Load only the reference file needed for the current request.
Quick Routing
- Workspace audit or pack:
use
liquefy openclawby default; only use plugin tools if the user already has the plugin enabled. - Policy denial or override question:
use
liquefy openclaw --explain ...and report the matched category/reason. - Next run must be protected:
use
liquefy openclaw runorliquefy safe-run, not raw OpenClaw. - User wants automatic OpenClaw archival:
use native hook install/status/uninstall via
liquefy_openclaw_plugin.py. - User wants specific agent session vaulting:
use
openclaw_tracevault.py. - User needs restore/search on an existing vault:
use
liquefy search/liquefy restore. - User wants filesystem/state protection outside packing:
use
state-guardorhistory-guard.
Example Intents
- "Scan my OpenClaw workspace and tell me what Liquefy would pack."
- "Why did Liquefy deny
credentials/api.pem?" - "Run OpenClaw with replay blocking and rollback."
- "Show the context gate history for this workspace."
- "Pack this workspace with ratio profile after review."
- "Install Liquefy hooks into OpenClaw and show status."
- "Restore this OpenClaw vault and search it for a trace id."
- "Protect
wallet-state.jsonbefore the next run."
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

