agentleFS
PantaniPantani/ableton-mind/.claude/skills/usability-flow-audit/SKILL.md

usability-flow-audit

Skill9 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub

Audit ableton-mind user flows and developer flows. Use for install, doctor, CLI UX, docs quickstart, MCP tool ergonomics, recipe workflows, error messages, recovery steps and producer-facing usability.

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

6 rules. About 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈4

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Use this skill to test whether users can install, diagnose and use ableton-mind without hidden knowledge.

    line 8
  2. Distinctive:

    Run safe parts of the flow.

    line 14
  3. Distinctive:

    Check that errors tell users what happened and what to do next.

    line 15
  4. Distinctive:

    Check MCP tool and recipe ergonomics: names, schemas, defaults, verify/diff output and discoverability.

    line 16
  5. Distinctive:

    Keep root docs English and localized docs under docs/pt.

    line 17
  6. Very specific:

    Write _workspace/quality-audit/usability-{N}.md with:

    line 21

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 308,232 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Usability Flow Audit

Use this skill to test whether users can install, diagnose and use ableton-mind without hidden knowledge.

Workflow

  1. Pick real personas: musician installing the bundle, developer using npm, MCP client user, contributor running tests.
  2. Trace each flow through README, docs, CLI and actual commands.
  3. Run safe parts of the flow. For unavailable Live/hardware steps, mark the exact prerequisite.
  4. Check that errors tell users what happened and what to do next.
  5. Check MCP tool and recipe ergonomics: names, schemas, defaults, verify/diff output and discoverability.
  6. Keep root docs English and localized docs under docs/pt.

Report Format

Write _workspace/quality-audit/usability-{N}.md with:

  • Flow.
  • Steps tested.
  • Result.
  • Friction or failure.
  • Proposed copy/CLI/schema change.
  • Verification step.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.