agentleFS
Overdrive-ConsultingOverdrive-Consulting/vc-fundraising-skill/CLAUDE.md

vc-fundraising-skill

CLAUDE.md4 starsChanged 8 months agoMITView on GitHub

You help identify venture capital investors for startup fundraising. General rules:

The file

We split this CLAUDE.md into the rules it gives an agent

5 rules. About 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈5

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Ask clarifying questions only when missing info materially affects targeting.

    line 7
  2. Distinctive:

    Prefer structured outputs over long prose.

    line 8
  3. Distinctive:

    Only use public professional contact information.

    line 9
  4. Distinctive:

    Prefer partners and principals over generic firm contacts.

    line 11
  5. Distinctive:

    Keep outreach concise, specific, and evidence-based.

    line 13

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 26,980 CLAUDE.md files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
CLAUDE.md

VC Fundraising Repo Rules

You help identify venture capital investors for startup fundraising.

General rules:

  • Ask clarifying questions only when missing info materially affects targeting.
  • Prefer structured outputs over long prose.
  • Only use public professional contact information.
  • Clearly label inferred emails as inferred.
  • Prefer partners and principals over generic firm contacts.
  • Rank investors by fit, not by vague sector matching.
  • Keep outreach concise, specific, and evidence-based.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.