agentleFS
OutThisLifeOutThisLife/brooklyn-skills/skills/stacked-pr/SKILL.md

stacked-pr

Skill207 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub

Handle dependent/stacked PRs and same-code-on-multiple-bases correctly. Use for a PR stacked on another, or when the same change must land on the default branch plus a release/production branch.

3 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

4 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 3 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 3

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Update the parent branch/PR first.

    line 15
  2. Distinctive:

    Keep the two PRs' code identical.

    line 28
  3. Distinctive:

    Treat the duplicate as a fresh review target.

    line 29
  4. Very specific:

    Use git merge-tree --write-tree --name-only <base> <head> to estimate conflicts without modifying a checkout or index.

    line 38

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 3 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Stacked & Multi-base PRs

Stacked (dependent) PRs

A child PR builds on a parent PR's branch. Update the stack bottom-up:

  1. Update the parent branch/PR first.
  2. Rebase the child onto the updated parent — not onto the default branch, and never "merge main into the leaf" as the only step.
  3. Push each level; keep each PR's base pointing at the one below it.

Multi-base (release + default)

Some orgs require the same change on the default branch AND a release/production branch:

  1. Confirm the required target branches from the repo's rules.
  2. Land the change once, then cherry-pick/port the identical code to the other base as a second PR.
  3. Keep the two PRs' code identical; note the sibling in each description.
  4. Treat the duplicate as a fresh review target. Request the original developer reviewer/team and use the repo's pending human/code-review labels. Do not copy QA approval or claim a developer checkmark from the sibling; the release PR needs its own explicit developer approval. Verify assignees, review requests, and labels after updating them.

Estimate an integration before changing branches

  • Fetch the real upstream default branch and every dependency head; compare ancestry so already-included fixes are not imported twice.
  • Use git merge-tree --write-tree --name-only <base> <head> to estimate conflicts without modifying a checkout or index. Report conflict counts as textual integration scope, not proof that auto-merged code is correct.
  • Preserve current upstream security and profile-routing behavior when reconciling older UI work; do not resolve whole files with ours/theirs just to eliminate markers.
  • Distinguish updating the local clone from publishing a fork-default update. A PR in a separate repository still compares against that repository's base; local upstream freshness does not update it.

MR additive-repair safeguards

  • Invoke the pinned Node executable directly for worktree tests and set NODE_PATH to that worktree's mr_modules on the command. Shared dependency symlinks and concurrent shells can otherwise resolve another checkout; verify process.execPath and require.resolve('MRUtils') first.
  • Check the merge commit's effective diff against its own base, not only HEAD. Lint-staged sees upstream files staged by a merge and can rewrite unrelated code; run targeted lint/tests and use a per-invocation hook override for the additive merge commit rather than changing repository hook configuration.
  • Reconcile CMS migration composition with already-merged migrations in both execution orders. Preserve foreign-edit/staged-batch refusal and verify published records before retiring an old route; saved redirect flags alone do not establish that a redirect reached production.

Don't

  • Collapse a stack by merging the default branch into the child.
  • Let the two base PRs drift apart.
  • Finish without listing every PR/MR in the stack as a link.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.