agentleFS
Ormus-SolutionsOrmus-Solutions/LibreGEO-Claude-Code/skills/geo-brand-mentions/SKILL.md

geo-brand-mentions

Skill1 starsChanged 44 days agoMITView on GitHub

Brand authority scan across the platforms AI models lean on for entity recognition (YouTube, Reddit, Wikipedia and Wikidata, LinkedIn, and others), producing a weighted Brand Authority Score (0-100), sentiment, and per-platform recommendations. Use when the user asks whether AI assistants know or recommend a brand, or wants off-site authority work that improves AI citations.

7 other projects use a version of this, 4 of them edited.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

11 rules. 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 10 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 6 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 1

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 10

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Check: youtube.com/@[brand-name] or youtube.com/c/[brand-name] for official channel

    line 72
  2. Very specific:

    Search: "[brand name]" site:youtube.com (exact match for mentions in descriptions)

    line 73
  3. Very specific:

    Search: "[brand name]" site:reddit.com (exact match)

    line 78
  4. Very specific:

    Check: reddit.com/r/[brand-name] for official subreddit

    line 79
  5. Very specific:

    Check: reddit.com/user/[brand-name] for official account

    line 80
  6. Very specific:

    Check: linkedin.com/company/[brand-name] for company page

    line 125
  7. Very specific:

    Search: [brand name] site:stackoverflow.com (if technical brand)

    line 130
  8. Very specific:

    Search: [brand name] site:news.ycombinator.com (Hacker News)

    line 132
  9. Very specific:

    Search: "[brand name]" broadly for news mentions (filter to last 6 months)

    line 133
  10. Distinctive:

    If competitors are identified, do a quick scan of their platform presence for context.

    line 142
  11. Very specific:

    Write a file named GEO-BRAND-MENTIONS.md using the exact template in templates.md (report header, platform breakdown table, per-platform …

    line 155

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 6 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Brand Mention Scanner Skill

Core Insight

Brand mentions correlate ~3x more strongly with AI visibility than traditional backlinks (Ahrefs, Dec 2025, 75K brands). Unlinked brand mentions predict AI citation better than Domain Rating or backlink count, and the platform matters enormously — a YouTube/Reddit mention outweighs a DR 70 dofollow link, because AI training data and retrieval disproportionately index high-engagement platforms.

This inverts traditional SEO: the signals that matter most for AI visibility (YouTube, Reddit) are nearly irrelevant in classic SEO, and vice versa.


Composite Brand Authority Score

Scoring Formula

PlatformWeightRationale
YouTube Presence25%Strongest correlation with AI citation (0.737)
Reddit Presence25%Second strongest; critical for product recommendations
Wikipedia / Wikidata20%Entity recognition foundation; AI training data cornerstone
LinkedIn Authority15%Professional authority signals; B2B relevance
Other Platforms15%Supplementary: Quora, GitHub, news, forums, podcasts

Formula:

Brand_Authority_Score = (YouTube * 0.25) + (Reddit * 0.25) + (Wikipedia * 0.20) + (LinkedIn * 0.15) + (Other * 0.15)

Score Interpretation

Score RangeRatingInterpretation
85-100DominantWell-recognized entity across AI platforms. Highly likely to be cited and recommended.
70-84StrongSolid cross-platform presence. AI likely recognizes and cites for relevant queries.
50-69ModeratePresence on some platforms but gaps exist. AI citation is inconsistent.
30-49WeakLimited platform presence. AI may not recognize as a distinct entity.
0-29MinimalNegligible presence. AI unlikely to cite or recommend.

For per-platform 0-100 rubrics, why each platform matters, and what to check on each — see platforms.md.


Analysis Procedure

Step 1: Identify Brand Information

Gather from the user or the website:

  • Brand name (exact spelling + official variants)
  • Founder/CEO name(s)
  • Domain URL
  • Industry/category
  • Key products or services (top 3)
  • Key competitors (for comparison context)

Step 2: Platform Scanning

For each platform, use WebFetch to search and assess presence.

YouTube Check:

  1. Search: [brand name] site:youtube.com
  2. Check: youtube.com/@[brand-name] or youtube.com/c/[brand-name] for official channel
  3. Search: "[brand name]" site:youtube.com (exact match for mentions in descriptions)
  4. Note: Channel subscriber count, video count, latest upload date, third-party mention count

Reddit Check:

  1. Search: [brand name] site:reddit.com
  2. Search: "[brand name]" site:reddit.com (exact match)
  3. Check: reddit.com/r/[brand-name] for official subreddit
  4. Check: reddit.com/user/[brand-name] for official account
  5. Note: Thread count, dominant subreddits, sentiment (positive/negative/neutral), recommendation frequency

Wikipedia Check (IMPORTANT — use BOTH methods to avoid false negatives):

Method 1 — Python API check (MOST RELIABLE, do this FIRST):

python3 -c "
import requests, json
from urllib.parse import quote_plus
brand = '[Brand_Name]'
# Check Wikipedia API directly
api_url = f'https://en.wikipedia.org/w/api.php?action=query&list=search&srsearch={quote_plus(brand)}&format=json'
r = requests.get(api_url, headers={'User-Agent': 'GEO-Audit/1.0'}, timeout=15)
data = r.json()
results = data.get('query', {}).get('search', [])
if results and brand.lower() in results[0].get('title', '').lower():
    print(f'WIKIPEDIA PAGE EXISTS: {results[0][\"title\"]}')
    print(f'URL: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/{results[0][\"title\"].replace(\" \", \"_\")}')
else:
    print('No direct Wikipedia page found')
# Check Wikidata
wd_url = f'https://www.wikidata.org/w/api.php?action=wbsearchentities&search={quote_plus(brand)}&language=en&format=json'
r2 = requests.get(wd_url, headers={'User-Agent': 'GEO-Audit/1.0'}, timeout=15)
wd = r2.json()
entities = wd.get('search', [])
if entities:
    print(f'WIKIDATA ENTRY: {entities[0].get(\"id\", \"\")} — {entities[0].get(\"description\", \"\")}')
"

Method 2 — Direct URL check (backup verification):

  1. WebFetch: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/[Brand_Name] — check if page loads (not redirect to search)
  2. WebFetch: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/[Founder_Name] for founder article

Method 3 — Search (least reliable, supplemental only):

  1. Search: [brand name] site:wikipedia.org
  2. Search: [brand name] site:wikidata.org

CRITICAL: Web search alone is NOT reliable for determining Wikipedia presence. ALWAYS run the Python API check first. If the API says a page exists, it exists — do not override with a search result that fails to find it.

  1. Note: Article existence, quality, edit history, Wikidata completeness

LinkedIn Check:

  1. Search: [brand name] site:linkedin.com
  2. Check: linkedin.com/company/[brand-name] for company page
  3. Note: Follower count, post frequency, employee count listed, engagement levels

Other Platforms:

  1. Search: [brand name] site:quora.com
  2. Search: [brand name] site:stackoverflow.com (if technical brand)
  3. Search: [brand name] site:github.com (if technical brand)
  4. Search: [brand name] site:news.ycombinator.com (Hacker News)
  5. Search: "[brand name]" broadly for news mentions (filter to last 6 months)
  6. Note: Presence/absence and quality of mentions on each platform

Step 3: Sentiment Assessment

For Reddit and discussion platforms, assess sentiment from the most recent and most prominent mentions. Use the sentiment indicator table in platforms.md (Positive / Neutral / Negative / Mixed).

Step 4: Competitive Comparison (Optional)

If competitors are identified, do a quick scan of their platform presence for context. A brand with "moderate" Reddit presence in an industry where competitors have zero Reddit presence is relatively strong — context calibrates the score.

Step 5: Score Calculation

  1. Score each platform (0-100) using the rubrics in platforms.md.
  2. Apply weights to compute the composite Brand Authority Score.
  3. Identify the strongest and weakest platforms.
  4. Generate specific, actionable recommendations for the weakest platforms — use the platform-specific quick-wins list in platforms.md.

Output

Write a file named GEO-BRAND-MENTIONS.md using the exact template in templates.md (report header, platform breakdown table, per-platform detail blocks, recommendations by horizon, optional competitive table, key takeaway).

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.