agentleFS
OpenxIntelligenceOpenxIntelligence/Coding-Agent-Skills/task-tracking/SKILL.md

task-tracking

Skill4 starsChanged 26 days agoMITView on GitHub

Automatic todo list creation and tracking for complex tasks. Activates when tasks have 3+ steps, user provides multiple items, or work requires careful planning. Ensures progress visibility and prevents forgotten steps.

5 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

11 rules. 0 are common, 11 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 4 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 11

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Ensure Claude proactively uses TodoWrite for complex tasks, maintaining visible progress and preventing forgotten steps.

    line 20
  2. Distinctive:

    Bug Fixing: - When investigation + fix + verification needed

    line 30
  3. Distinctive:

    Mark complete IMMEDIATELY: - Don't batch completions

    line 52
  4. Distinctive:

    Never mark incomplete work done: - Keep in_progress if blocked

    line 53
  5. Distinctive:

    Create blockers as new tasks: - When stuck, add investigation task

    line 54
  6. Distinctive:

    When receiving a complex request:

    line 71
  7. Distinctive:

    If stuck on a task:

    line 107
  8. Distinctive:

    Forgetting to update status: - Always mark in_progress before starting

    line 205
  9. Distinctive:

    Marking blocked tasks complete: - Keep trying or add blocker task

    line 207
  10. Distinctive:

    No todos for complex work: - If 3+ steps, always create list

    line 210
  11. Distinctive:

    After completing a complex task set, consider using memory-keeper to persist:

    line 214

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 4 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Task Tracking Skill

Purpose

Ensure Claude proactively uses TodoWrite for complex tasks, maintaining visible progress and preventing forgotten steps.

When to Activate (Automatic)

ALWAYS create a todo list when:

  1. Complex Tasks - 3+ distinct steps or actions required
  2. Multi-Item Requests - User provides numbered/comma-separated lists
  3. Feature Implementation - Building new functionality
  4. Refactoring - Code restructuring affecting multiple files
  5. Bug Fixing - When investigation + fix + verification needed
  6. System Changes - Infrastructure, config, or architectural work

Skip todo lists for:

  • Single-line fixes (typos, obvious bugs)
  • Pure questions/explanations
  • Tasks completable in <3 trivial steps

Task State Management

┌─────────────┐     ┌──────────────┐     ┌───────────────┐
│   pending   │ ──► │ in_progress  │ ──► │   completed   │
└─────────────┘     └──────────────┘     └───────────────┘
                           │
                           ▼ (if blocked)
                    Create new task for blocker

Rules

  1. One in_progress at a time - Focus on single task
  2. Mark complete IMMEDIATELY - Don't batch completions
  3. Never mark incomplete work done - Keep in_progress if blocked
  4. Create blockers as new tasks - When stuck, add investigation task

Todo List Format

Each todo item requires TWO forms:

{
  "content": "Implement user authentication",      // Imperative (what to do)
  "activeForm": "Implementing user authentication", // Present continuous (doing)
  "status": "pending"
}

Workflow Pattern

1. Task Reception

When receiving a complex request:

User: "Add dark mode with persistence and system preference detection"

Claude thinks: This has 3+ steps → Create todo list

2. Immediate Planning

TodoWrite([
  {"content": "Add dark mode toggle component", "activeForm": "Adding dark mode toggle", "status": "pending"},
  {"content": "Implement theme context/state", "activeForm": "Implementing theme state", "status": "pending"},
  {"content": "Add system preference detection", "activeForm": "Adding system preference detection", "status": "pending"},
  {"content": "Persist theme choice to localStorage", "activeForm": "Persisting theme choice", "status": "pending"},
  {"content": "Update components to use theme", "activeForm": "Updating components", "status": "pending"}
])

3. Progress Updates

// Starting first task
TodoWrite([
  {"content": "Add dark mode toggle component", "activeForm": "Adding dark mode toggle", "status": "in_progress"},
  ...rest pending
])

// After completing first task
TodoWrite([
  {"content": "Add dark mode toggle component", "activeForm": "Adding dark mode toggle", "status": "completed"},
  {"content": "Implement theme context/state", "activeForm": "Implementing theme state", "status": "in_progress"},
  ...rest pending
])

4. Handling Blockers

If stuck on a task:

// Don't mark complete! Add blocker task
TodoWrite([
  {"content": "Investigate localStorage API issue", "activeForm": "Investigating localStorage issue", "status": "in_progress"},
  {"content": "Persist theme choice to localStorage", "activeForm": "Persisting theme choice", "status": "pending"},  // stays pending
  ...
])

Completion Requirements

Only mark completed when ALL true:

  • ✅ Implementation is complete (not partial)
  • ✅ No errors or test failures
  • ✅ All acceptance criteria met
  • ✅ Can demonstrate/verify success

Keep in_progress if ANY true:

  • ❌ Tests are failing
  • ❌ Implementation is partial
  • ❌ Encountered unresolved errors
  • ❌ Missing dependencies

Task Breakdown Guidelines

Good Tasks (Specific & Actionable)

✅ "Create UserService with CRUD methods"
✅ "Add input validation for email field"
✅ "Write unit tests for authentication flow"
✅ "Fix null pointer in getUser endpoint"

Bad Tasks (Vague & Unmeasurable)

❌ "Improve code quality"
❌ "Make it better"
❌ "Handle errors"
❌ "Do the backend stuff"

Integration with Other Skills

SituationSkill Synergy
Bug fixtask-tracking + systematic-debugging
New APItask-tracking + api-design-patterns
Complex problemtask-tracking + escalation-reasoning
Claiming donetask-tracking + quality-gates

Examples

Example 1: Feature Request

User: "Implement user registration with email verification"

→ Create todos:
1. Create registration form component
2. Add form validation (email, password strength)
3. Create registration API endpoint
4. Implement email service integration
5. Create verification token system
6. Add verification endpoint
7. Write tests for registration flow
8. Test email delivery

Example 2: Bug Report

User: "Users can't log in after password reset"

→ Create todos:
1. Reproduce the issue locally
2. Investigate password reset flow
3. Check token generation/validation
4. Identify root cause
5. Implement fix
6. Add regression test
7. Verify fix in staging

Example 3: Refactoring

User: "Refactor the API to use async/await instead of callbacks"

→ Create todos:
1. Identify all callback-based functions
2. Refactor auth module to async/await
3. Refactor user module to async/await
4. Refactor data module to async/await
5. Update error handling patterns
6. Run existing tests
7. Fix any failing tests

Anti-Patterns to Avoid

  1. Forgetting to update status - Always mark in_progress before starting
  2. Batching completions - Mark done immediately, not all at end
  3. Marking blocked tasks complete - Keep trying or add blocker task
  4. Too granular - "Write line 1", "Write line 2" is too much
  5. Too vague - "Do the thing" is not actionable
  6. No todos for complex work - If 3+ steps, always create list

Memory Integration

After completing a complex task set, consider using memory-keeper to persist:

  • Patterns discovered
  • Decisions made
  • User preferences observed

This ensures learnings survive context compaction.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.