agentleFS
OpenGitCodeOpenGitCode/OpenShell/skills/healthcheck/SKILL.md

healthcheck

Skill0 starsChanged 7 months agoMITView on GitHub

Host security hardening and risk-tolerance configuration for OpenShell deployments. Use when a user asks for security audits, firewall/SSH/update hardening, risk posture, exposure review, OpenShell cron scheduling for periodic checks, or version status checks on a machine running OpenShell (laptop, workstation, Pi, VPS).

38 other projects use a version of this, 19 of them edited.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use discord-e2e, openclaw-repair-sweep and 8 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • molt-botSkill

    discord-e2e

    Test Discord with Convex-leased QA bots: check credentials without a Gateway, exercise owned messages, or prove OpenClaw replies, files, threads, reactions, streaming, and typing. Distinguish API and Gateway evidence from manual user interactions.

    Also in 10 projects that use this

  • molt-botSkill

    openclaw-repair-sweep

    Run scoped OpenClaw issue/PR repair campaigns: coordinate workers, prove root causes, and land or close verified work under the requested authority.

    Also in 10 projects that use this

  • clawdbotSkill

    openclaw-performance

    Performance work in OpenClaw: a slow or heavy flow (latency, CPU, memory, SQL, RPC, renders), writing or reviewing a perf PR, or adding a cache. Count the work, delete waste first, cache last.

    Also in 7 projects that use this

  • clawdbotSkill

    plugin-sdk-impact

    Count Plugin SDK consumers across live ClawHub releases and bundled OpenClaw plugins before deprecation, removal, or behavior changes; supports public release-date filters.

    Also in 7 projects that use this

  • supermansuper563-opsSkill

    auto-qa

    Continuously audit, live-test, and stress-test the current OpenClaw codebase across at least ten independently scoped subsystem lanes; default to 100 independently verified, landed root-cause fixes, maintain an evidence-backed report, and announce each merged pull request immediately. Use for OpenClaw-wide autonomous QA, live-provider campaigns, gateway, CLI, web, plugin, native-app, scenario, packaging, and extended soak testing.

    Also in 10 projects that use this

  • hkyutongSkill

    openclaw-parallels-smoke

    End-to-end Parallels smoke, upgrade, and rerun workflow for OpenClaw across macOS, Windows, and Linux guests. Use when Codex needs to run, rerun, debug, or interpret VM-based install, onboarding, gateway smoke tests, latest-release-to-main upgrade checks, fresh snapshot retests, or optional Discord roundtrip verification under Parallels.

    Also in 14 projects that use this

  • +2 more from molt-bot

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

29 rules. 0 are common, 18 are distinctive, and 11 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 37 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 18

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 11

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Do not modify remote access settings without confirming how the user connects.

    line 16
  2. Distinctive:

    Prefer reversible, staged changes with a rollback plan.

    line 17
  3. Very specific:

    Never claim OpenShell changes the host firewall, SSH, or OS updates.

    line 18
  4. Distinctive:

    If role/identity is unknown, provide recommendations only.

    line 19
  5. Distinctive:

    Before starting, check the current model.

    line 27
  6. Distinctive:

    If you must ask, use non-technical prompts:

    line 49
  7. Distinctive:

    Only ask for the risk profile after system context is known.

    line 64
  8. Distinctive:

    If the user grants read-only permission, run the OS-appropriate checks by default.

    line 66
  9. Distinctive:

    If browser control is enabled, recommend that 2FA be enabled on all important accounts, with hardware keys preferred and SMS not sufficient.

    line 90
  10. Distinctive:

    Ask the user to pick or confirm a risk posture and any required open services/ports (numbered choices below).

    line 100
  11. Distinctive:

    Do not pigeonhole into fixed profiles.

    line 101
  12. Distinctive:

    Always show the plan before any changes.

    line 122
  13. Distinctive:

    Do it for me (guided, step-by-step approvals)

    line 128
  14. Distinctive:

    Stop on unexpected output and ask for guidance

    line 140
  15. Very specific:

    After OpenShell install or first hardening pass, run at least one baseline audit and version check:

    line 171
  16. Very specific:

    When scheduling headless cron runs, include a note in the output that instructs the user to call healthcheck so issues can be fixed.

    line 178
  17. Distinctive:

    After any audit or hardening pass, explicitly offer scheduling and require a direct response.

    line 182
  18. Distinctive:

    If the user says yes, ask for:

    line 186
  19. Distinctive:

    Use a stable cron job name so updates are deterministic.

    line 191
  20. Very specific:

    Before creating, openshell cron list and match on exact name.

    line 196
  21. Very specific:

    If not found, openshell cron add --name <name> ....

    line 197
  22. Distinctive:

    Use only supported commands and flags:

    line 206
  23. Very specific:

    Do not invent CLI flags or imply OpenShell enforces host firewall/SSH policies.

    line 214
  24. Very specific:

    Only write to memory files when the user explicitly opts in and the session is a private/local workspace (per …

    line 229
  25. Very specific:

    Follow the durable-memory prompt format used by OpenShell compaction:

    line 233
  26. Very specific:

    Write lasting notes to memory/YYYY-MM-DD.md.

    line 235
  27. Very specific:

    After each audit/hardening run, if opted-in, append a short, dated summary to memory/YYYY-MM-DD.md (what was checked, key findings, actions …

    line 237
  28. Very specific:

    If there are durable preferences or decisions (risk posture, allowed ports, update policy), also update MEMORY.md (long-term memory is …

    line 241
  29. Distinctive:

    If the session cannot write to the workspace, ask for permission or provide exact entries the user can paste into the memory files.

    line 244

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 37 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

OpenShell Host Hardening

Overview

Assess and harden the host running OpenShell, then align it to a user-defined risk tolerance without breaking access. Use OpenShell security tooling as a first-class signal, but treat OS hardening as a separate, explicit set of steps.

Core rules

  • Recommend running this skill with a state-of-the-art model (e.g., Opus 4.5, GPT 5.2+). The agent should self-check the current model and suggest switching if below that level; do not block execution.
  • Require explicit approval before any state-changing action.
  • Do not modify remote access settings without confirming how the user connects.
  • Prefer reversible, staged changes with a rollback plan.
  • Never claim OpenShell changes the host firewall, SSH, or OS updates; it does not.
  • If role/identity is unknown, provide recommendations only.
  • Formatting: every set of user choices must be numbered so the user can reply with a single digit.
  • System-level backups are recommended; try to verify status.

Workflow (follow in order)

0) Model self-check (non-blocking)

Before starting, check the current model. If it is below state-of-the-art (e.g., Opus 4.5, GPT 5.2+), recommend switching. Do not block execution.

1) Establish context (read-only)

Try to infer 1–5 from the environment before asking. Prefer simple, non-technical questions if you need confirmation.

Determine (in order):

  1. OS and version (Linux/macOS/Windows), container vs host.
  2. Privilege level (root/admin vs user).
  3. Access path (local console, SSH, RDP, tailnet).
  4. Network exposure (public IP, reverse proxy, tunnel).
  5. OpenShell gateway status and bind address.
  6. Backup system and status (e.g., Time Machine, system images, snapshots).
  7. Deployment context (local mac app, headless gateway host, remote gateway, container/CI).
  8. Disk encryption status (FileVault/LUKS/BitLocker).
  9. OS automatic security updates status. Note: these are not blocking items, but are highly recommended, especially if OpenShell can access sensitive data.
  10. Usage mode for a personal assistant with full access (local workstation vs headless/remote vs other).

First ask once for permission to run read-only checks. If granted, run them by default and only ask questions for items you cannot infer or verify. Do not ask for information already visible in runtime or command output. Keep the permission ask as a single sentence, and list follow-up info needed as an unordered list (not numbered) unless you are presenting selectable choices.

If you must ask, use non-technical prompts:

  • “Are you using a Mac, Windows PC, or Linux?”
  • “Are you logged in directly on the machine, or connecting from another computer?”
  • “Is this machine reachable from the public internet, or only on your home/network?”
  • “Do you have backups enabled (e.g., Time Machine), and are they current?”
  • “Is disk encryption turned on (FileVault/BitLocker/LUKS)?”
  • “Are automatic security updates enabled?”
  • “How do you use this machine?” Examples:
    • Personal machine shared with the assistant
    • Dedicated local machine for the assistant
    • Dedicated remote machine/server accessed remotely (always on)
    • Something else?

Only ask for the risk profile after system context is known.

If the user grants read-only permission, run the OS-appropriate checks by default. If not, offer them (numbered). Examples:

  1. OS: uname -a, sw_vers, cat /etc/os-release.
  2. Listening ports:
    • Linux: ss -ltnup (or ss -ltnp if -u unsupported).
    • macOS: lsof -nP -iTCP -sTCP:LISTEN.
  3. Firewall status:
    • Linux: ufw status, firewall-cmd --state, nft list ruleset (pick what is installed).
    • macOS: /usr/libexec/ApplicationFirewall/socketfilterfw --getglobalstate and pfctl -s info.
  4. Backups (macOS): tmutil status (if Time Machine is used).

2) Run OpenShell security audits (read-only)

As part of the default read-only checks, run openshell security audit --deep. Only offer alternatives if the user requests them:

  1. openshell security audit (faster, non-probing)
  2. openshell security audit --json (structured output)

Offer to apply OpenShell safe defaults (numbered):

  1. openshell security audit --fix

Be explicit that --fix only tightens OpenShell defaults and file permissions. It does not change host firewall, SSH, or OS update policies.

If browser control is enabled, recommend that 2FA be enabled on all important accounts, with hardware keys preferred and SMS not sufficient.

3) Check OpenShell version/update status (read-only)

As part of the default read-only checks, run openshell update status.

Report the current channel and whether an update is available.

4) Determine risk tolerance (after system context)

Ask the user to pick or confirm a risk posture and any required open services/ports (numbered choices below). Do not pigeonhole into fixed profiles; if the user prefers, capture requirements instead of choosing a profile. Offer suggested profiles as optional defaults (numbered). Note that most users pick Home/Workstation Balanced:

  1. Home/Workstation Balanced (most common): firewall on with reasonable defaults, remote access restricted to LAN or tailnet.
  2. VPS Hardened: deny-by-default inbound firewall, minimal open ports, key-only SSH, no root login, automatic security updates.
  3. Developer Convenience: more local services allowed, explicit exposure warnings, still audited.
  4. Custom: user-defined constraints (services, exposure, update cadence, access methods).

5) Produce a remediation plan

Provide a plan that includes:

  • Target profile
  • Current posture summary
  • Gaps vs target
  • Step-by-step remediation with exact commands
  • Access-preservation strategy and rollback
  • Risks and potential lockout scenarios
  • Least-privilege notes (e.g., avoid admin usage, tighten ownership/permissions where safe)
  • Credential hygiene notes (location of OpenShell creds, prefer disk encryption)

Always show the plan before any changes.

6) Offer execution options

Offer one of these choices (numbered so users can reply with a single digit):

  1. Do it for me (guided, step-by-step approvals)
  2. Show plan only
  3. Fix only critical issues
  4. Export commands for later

7) Execute with confirmations

For each step:

  • Show the exact command
  • Explain impact and rollback
  • Confirm access will remain available
  • Stop on unexpected output and ask for guidance

8) Verify and report

Re-check:

  • Firewall status
  • Listening ports
  • Remote access still works
  • OpenShell security audit (re-run)

Deliver a final posture report and note any deferred items.

Required confirmations (always)

Require explicit approval for:

  • Firewall rule changes
  • Opening/closing ports
  • SSH/RDP configuration changes
  • Installing/removing packages
  • Enabling/disabling services
  • User/group modifications
  • Scheduling tasks or startup persistence
  • Update policy changes
  • Access to sensitive files or credentials

If unsure, ask.

Periodic checks

After OpenShell install or first hardening pass, run at least one baseline audit and version check:

  • openshell security audit
  • openshell security audit --deep
  • openshell update status

Ongoing monitoring is recommended. Use the OpenShell cron tool/CLI to schedule periodic audits (Gateway scheduler). Do not create scheduled tasks without explicit approval. Store outputs in a user-approved location and avoid secrets in logs. When scheduling headless cron runs, include a note in the output that instructs the user to call healthcheck so issues can be fixed.

Required prompt to schedule (always)

After any audit or hardening pass, explicitly offer scheduling and require a direct response. Use a short prompt like (numbered):

  1. “Do you want me to schedule periodic audits (e.g., daily/weekly) via openshell cron add?”

If the user says yes, ask for:

  • cadence (daily/weekly), preferred time window, and output location
  • whether to also schedule openshell update status

Use a stable cron job name so updates are deterministic. Prefer exact names:

  • healthcheck:security-audit
  • healthcheck:update-status

Before creating, openshell cron list and match on exact name. If found, openshell cron edit <id> .... If not found, openshell cron add --name <name> ....

Also offer a periodic version check so the user can decide when to update (numbered):

  1. openshell update status (preferred for source checkouts and channels)
  2. npm view openshell version (published npm version)

OpenShell command accuracy

Use only supported commands and flags:

  • openshell security audit [--deep] [--fix] [--json]
  • openshell status / openshell status --deep
  • openshell health --json
  • openshell update status
  • openshell cron add|list|runs|run

Do not invent CLI flags or imply OpenShell enforces host firewall/SSH policies.

Logging and audit trail

Record:

  • Gateway identity and role
  • Plan ID and timestamp
  • Approved steps and exact commands
  • Exit codes and files modified (best effort)

Redact secrets. Never log tokens or full credential contents.

Memory writes (conditional)

Only write to memory files when the user explicitly opts in and the session is a private/local workspace (per docs/reference/templates/AGENTS.md). Otherwise provide a redacted, paste-ready summary the user can decide to save elsewhere.

Follow the durable-memory prompt format used by OpenShell compaction:

  • Write lasting notes to memory/YYYY-MM-DD.md.

After each audit/hardening run, if opted-in, append a short, dated summary to memory/YYYY-MM-DD.md (what was checked, key findings, actions taken, any scheduled cron jobs, key decisions, and all commands executed). Append-only: never overwrite existing entries. Redact sensitive host details (usernames, hostnames, IPs, serials, service names, tokens). If there are durable preferences or decisions (risk posture, allowed ports, update policy), also update MEMORY.md (long-term memory is optional and only used in private sessions).

If the session cannot write to the workspace, ask for permission or provide exact entries the user can paste into the memory files.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.