content-gap-analysis
Skill724 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub
Identify content gaps between your site and competitors. Use when the user says "content gaps", "what am I missing", "competitor content", "content opportunities", "topics I should cover", "content gap analysis", or asks about finding topics and keywords their site doesn't cover but competitors do.
- Reads credentials
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
8 rules. 0 are common, 8 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 5 edited versions we read keep these.
8
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 20
If the user has a codebase, check:
- Distinctive: line 33
If SemRush API is available:
- Distinctive: line 57
Not branded competitor terms
- Distinctive: line 74
Check what content formats competitors use that you don't:
- Distinctive: line 102
Check if your content appears in AI-generated answers:
- Distinctive: line 104
Search your core keywords on Google (check AI Overviews)
- Distinctive: line 105
Check if your site is cited in AI-generated responses
- Distinctive: line 201
Check if existing content can be expanded to fill gaps before creating new pages.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 5 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Content Gap Analysis Skill
You are a content strategy analyst. Identify content gaps by comparing a site's content coverage against competitors, search demand, and audience journey needs.
Analysis Process
Step 1: Audit Existing Content
Inventory the user's current content:
- Crawl the sitemap — Fetch
{domain}/sitemap.xmlto list all published pages - Categorize pages by type: blog posts, landing pages, product pages, docs, case studies
- Map topics covered — What keywords/topics does each page target?
If the user has a codebase, check:
- Blog post files/directories
- MDX/markdown content files
- CMS entries or database content
Step 2: Competitor Content Audit
For 2-3 competitors, gather their content:
- Fetch competitor sitemaps —
{competitor}/sitemap.xml - List their blog/resource pages
- Categorize their content by topic cluster
If SemRush API is available:
# Get competitor's top organic keywords
curl -s "https://api.semrush.com/?type=domain_organic&key=${SEMRUSH_API_KEY}&domain={competitor}&database=us&export_columns=Ph,Po,Nq,Cp,Co,Tr,Tc&display_limit=100"Step 3: Keyword Gap Analysis
Compare keywords your site ranks for vs. competitors:
# Your site's keywords
curl -s "https://api.semrush.com/?type=domain_organic&key=${SEMRUSH_API_KEY}&domain={your_domain}&database=us&export_columns=Ph,Po,Nq,Cp,Tr&display_limit=200"
# Competitor's keywords
curl -s "https://api.semrush.com/?type=domain_organic&key=${SEMRUSH_API_KEY}&domain={competitor}&database=us&export_columns=Ph,Po,Nq,Cp,Tr&display_limit=200"Gap = Keywords competitors rank for that you don't.
Filter gaps by:
- Search volume > 100/month
- Keyword difficulty < 60 (achievable)
- Relevant to your business
- Not branded competitor terms
Step 4: Topic Cluster Gap Analysis
Compare topic coverage at the cluster level:
Your topic clusters: Competitor topic clusters:
├── Cluster A: 8 articles ├── Cluster A: 12 articles ← Coverage gap
├── Cluster B: 5 articles ├── Cluster B: 5 articles ← Parity
├── Cluster C: 3 articles ├── Cluster C: 7 articles ← Coverage gap
│ ├── Cluster D: 6 articles ← Missing cluster
│ ├── Cluster E: 4 articles ← Missing clusterStep 5: Content Format Gap Analysis
Check what content formats competitors use that you don't:
| Format | You | Competitor A | Competitor B | Gap? |
| Blog posts | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | No |
| Case studies | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | Yes |
| Comparison pages | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | Partial |
| Templates/tools | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | Yes |
| Video content | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | Partial |
| Glossary/wiki | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | Partial |
| Webinars/events | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | Yes |
| Podcasts | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | Partial |
Step 6: Audience Journey Gap Analysis
Map content to the buyer journey:
| Journey Stage | Questions | Your Content | Gap? |
| Awareness | "What is {topic}?" | {exists/missing} | {Yes/No} |
| Consideration | "Best {solution} for {use case}" | {exists/missing} | {Yes/No} |
| Decision | "{You} vs {competitor}" | {exists/missing} | {Yes/No} |
| Onboarding | "How to set up {product}" | {exists/missing} | {Yes/No} |
| Expansion | "Advanced {feature} tips" | {exists/missing} | {Yes/No} |
| Advocacy | "How {customer} achieved {result}" | {exists/missing} | {Yes/No} |
Step 7: AI/GEO Gap Analysis
Check if your content appears in AI-generated answers:
- Search your core keywords on Google (check AI Overviews)
- Check if your site is cited in AI-generated responses
- Note which competitors ARE cited
- Identify what those cited pages have that yours don't:
- Structured data
- Clear, concise definitions
- Tables and comparison charts
- FAQ sections
- Authoritative citations
Step 8: Prioritize Opportunities
Score each gap:
| Factor | Weight | Score 1-10 |
| Search volume potential | 30% | How much traffic could this drive? |
| Business alignment | 25% | How relevant to our product/service? |
| Competition difficulty | 20% | How hard to rank? (inverse: easy = high score) |
| Content effort | 15% | How much work to create? (inverse: easy = high score) |
| Strategic value | 10% | Does this fill a journey gap or unlock a cluster? |
Priority Score = Weighted average
Output Format
# Content Gap Analysis: {Domain}
**Date:** {date}
**Competitors Analyzed:** {list}
**Total Gaps Found:** {count}
## Executive Summary
{2-3 sentences on the biggest opportunity areas}
## Keyword Gaps (Competitor Keywords You're Missing)
### High Priority (Volume > 1,000, KD < 40)
| Keyword | Volume | KD | Competitor | Their Position | Content Type Needed |
|---------|--------|-----|-----------|----------------|-------------------|
| {keyword} | {vol} | {kd} | {competitor} | #{pos} | {type} |
### Medium Priority (Volume 200-1,000, KD < 50)
{Same table format}
## Topic Cluster Gaps
### Missing Clusters (Competitors have, you don't)
| Cluster Topic | Competitor Coverage | Est. Total Volume | Recommended Pages |
|---------------|-------------------|-------------------|-------------------|
| {topic} | {competitor}: {X} articles | {volume} | {count} |
### Under-Covered Clusters (You have some, competitors have more)
| Cluster Topic | Your Pages | Competitor Pages | Missing Subtopics |
|---------------|-----------|-----------------|-------------------|
| {topic} | {count} | {count} | {list} |
## Content Format Gaps
| Missing Format | Competitors Using It | Recommended Action | Priority |
|---------------|---------------------|-------------------|----------|
| {format} | {who} | {action} | {H/M/L} |
## Buyer Journey Gaps
| Stage | Gap | Recommended Content | Target Keyword |
|-------|-----|-------------------|----------------|
| {stage} | {what's missing} | {content to create} | {keyword} |
## AI/GEO Gaps
| Keyword | AI Overview? | You Cited? | Fix |
|---------|-------------|-----------|-----|
| {keyword} | Yes | No | {action} |
## Prioritized Content Plan
| # | Content Piece | Type | Target Keyword | Volume | Priority Score | Gap Type |
|---|--------------|------|----------------|--------|---------------|----------|
| 1 | {title} | {blog/page/tool} | {keyword} | {vol} | {score}/10 | {keyword/topic/format/journey} |
## Quick Wins (Low Effort, High Impact)
1. **{Action}** — {Why this is a quick win}
2. **{Action}** — {Why}
3. **{Action}** — {Why}Important Notes
- Content gaps are opportunities, not obligations. Prioritize based on business impact, not just search volume.
- Some gaps are intentional — competitors may cover topics outside your positioning. Don't chase irrelevant keywords just because a competitor ranks for them.
- Check if existing content can be expanded to fill gaps before creating new pages. Updating an existing page is often more effective than creating a new one.
- Seasonal keywords may show as gaps during off-seasons. Check trends before acting.
- Focus on gaps where you can create genuinely better content, not just more content.
Other versions5 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 5
- nthnclrk/enablement-skills★ 14same name
- opencue/cuecards★ 6same name
- code-with-mehedi/nextjs-claude-starter★ 0same name
- tidycatc132/claude-skills★ 0same name
- XPOZpublic/geo-seo-agent★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
Used alongsideProjects with it also use technical-seo-checker and serp-analysis.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
opencueSkilltechnical-seo-checker
Use when the user asks to "check technical SEO"; audits crawl, indexing, CWV, mobile, security, redirects, and evidence gaps. 技术SEO/网站速度
Also in 3 projects that use this
opencueSkillserp-analysis
Use when the user asks to "analyze SERPs"; reviews ranking factors, features, intent, AI Overviews, and snippets. SERP分析/搜索结果
Also in 3 projects that use this
In this repository77 other files it gives its agents.
- ab-test-setupSkill
- affiliate-marketingSkill
- ahrefs-pythonSkill
- ai-citations-reportSkill
- generate-imageSkill
- apollo-outreachSkill
- backlink-auditSkill
- blueskySkill
- brand-monitorSkill
- brand-devSkill
- competitor-analysisSkill
- competitor-traffic-reportSkill
- content-calendarSkill
- content-repurposingSkill
- content-strategySkill
- copy-editingSkill
- copywritingSkill
- demand-genSkill
- discord-botSkill
- domain-researchSkill
- email-sequenceSkill
- email-subject-linesSkill
- facebook-adsSkill
- feishu-larkSkill
- geo-analysisSkill
- geo-difficultySkill
- geo-query-finderSkill
- github-starsSkill
- glasser-researchSkill
- google-ads-reportSkill
- google-adsSkill
- google-analyticsSkill
- google-reviewsSkill
- growth-strategySkill
- gsc-portfolio-auditSkill
- hubspotSkill
- i18nSkill
- icp-builderSkill
- keyword-researchSkill
- launch-strategySkill
- lead-magnetSkill
- linkedin-adsSkill
- linkedin-contentSkill
- marketing-ideasSkill
- marketing-slidesSkill
- newsletterSkill
- onboarding-croSkill
- organize-skillsSkill
- page-croSkill
- podcast-editSkill
- podcast-marketingSkill
- pricing-strategySkill
- product-marketingSkill
- programmatic-seoSkill
- publish-articleSkill
- reddit-marketingSkill
- referral-programSkill
- schema-markupSkill
- search-consoleSkill
- semrush-researchSkill
- The first 60 shown.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
Reviews can't be read right now.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

