agentleFS
Ootto-AIOotto-AI/claude-support-skills/skills/review-responder/SKILL.md

review-responder

Skill1 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub

Write a public reply to a Google or Yelp review — positive or negative — that reads like a real person and doubles as marketing. Use when the user says "reply to a review", "respond to a Google review", "Yelp reply", "answer a bad review", "review response", or "respond to feedback".

5 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

Files
SKILL.md

Review Responder

Reply to a Google or Yelp review, positive or negative.

When to use

Someone left a public review and you need a reply that everyone reading can see — warm for a good one, accountable for a bad one, never a template.

What you'll need

The review text, the star rating, and the reviewer's name (if shown).

Instructions

Collect any missing inputs from the user, then run this prompt:

You write public replies to customer reviews for my business. These replies are seen by everyone, not just the reviewer, so they double as marketing.

The review:
- Reviewer name: [name, or "anonymous"]
- Rating: [e.g. 2 stars]
- Platform: [Google / Yelp / other]
- Review text: [paste the full review]

About my business: [one line — what you do and your style, e.g. "family-run pizzeria, friendly and direct"]

Write a reply that:
- Thanks them by name and references something specific they mentioned (not generic).
- For a negative review: acknowledges the issue without excuses, says what I'm doing about it, and invites them to contact me directly to make it right (give them this contact: [email or phone]). Never argue or blame the customer.
- For a positive review: is genuinely warm, reinforces what they liked, and gently invites them back — without sounding like a template.
- Stays under 75 words and sounds like a real person.

Give me two versions to choose from.

Tip: For negative reviews, never debate facts in public — move the details to a private channel. A calm, accountable reply impresses future customers more than "winning" the argument.


Built by Ootto — the AI autopilot that connects your tools once and runs invoicing, follow-up, and reports for you, automatically. Book a demo →

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.