microservices-architect
Skill4 starsChanged 2 months agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Design and architect microservices following Chris Richardson's Microservices Patterns. Use when designing services, APIs, data flows, or evaluating architecture decisions. Guides full workflow from feature intake to production-ready design with observability, async patterns, security, testing, and deployment strategies.
19 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- santiago-migoni/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- lsyamsiar/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- codeApe-7/ai-agent-workflowGrouptheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- hu465/claude-skills-their own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- sandraschi/advanced-memory-mcptheir own version, first seen Oct 24, 2026
- zacklecon/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use ui-ux-pro-max.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
StrayDragonSkillui-ux-pro-max
UI/UX design intelligence. 50 styles, 21 palettes, 50 font pairings, 20 charts, 8 stacks (React, Next.js, Vue, Svelte, SwiftUI, React Native, Flutter, Tailwind). Actions: plan, build, create, design, implement, review, fix, improve, optimize, enhance, refactor, check UI/UX code. Projects: website, landing page, dashboard, admin panel, e-commerce, SaaS, portfolio, blog, mobile app, .html, .tsx, .vue, .svelte. Elements: button, modal, navbar, sidebar, card, table, form, chart. Styles: glassmorphism, claymorphism, minimalism, brutalism, neumorphism, bento grid, dark mode, responsive, skeuomorphism, flat design. Topics: color palette, accessibility, animation, layout, typography, font pairing, spacing, hover, shadow, gradient.
Also in 5 projects that use this
Other versions19 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 19
- Jeffallan/claude-skills★ 12ksame name
- jshsakura/awesome-opencode-skills★ 30same name
- sandraschi/advanced-memory-mcp★ 19same name
- codeApe-7/ai-agent-workflowGroup★ 18same name
- belokonm/claude-supercode-skills★ 11same name
- PIXARTSeu/Synapse★ 9same name
- thesaifalitai/claude-setup★ 9same name
- jdanigo/hydraia★ 8same name
- keez97/claude-architecture-skills★ 8same name
- nicolasestrem/antigravity-gemini-skills★ 8same name
9 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository43 other files it gives its agents.
- skills/vercel-react-best-practices/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- agent-notepadSkill
- architecture-reviewerSkill
- backend-service-auditorSkill
- channel-listenerSkill
- code-reviewerSkill
- coder-file-transferSkill
- cold-start-generatorSkill
- creating-skillsSkill
- critical-thinkingSkill
- dark-factory-buildSkill
- dependency-risk-auditorSkill
- df-adversary-gateSkill
- df-app-walkthroughSkill
- df-context-storeSkill
- df-data-transform-lensSkill
- df-dispatch-subagentsSkill
- df-infrastructureSkill
- df-observabilitySkill
- df-product-ownerSkill
- df-qaSkill
- df-solution-architectSkill
- df-tdd-developerSkill
- df-ui-verifySkill
- df-video-intakeSkill
- dx-maintainability-reviewerSkill
- frontend-auditorSkill
- handoffSkill
- production-readiness-reviewerSkill
- repo-docsSkill
- requirements-discoverySkill
- sc-auditSkill
- sc-devSkill
- scope-initSkill
- scope-retireSkill
- security-threat-modelerSkill
- service-mapperSkill
- test-quality-gatekeeperSkill
- vercel-react-best-practicesSkill
- vinculum-loopSkill
- vinculum-mapSkill
- web-design-guidelinesSkill
- work-autonomouslySkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
3 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 17 edited versions we read keep these.
3
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 67
When designing microservices, default to:
- Distinctive: line 84
Treat exceptions as exceptions
- Distinctive: line 85
If there is ambiguity, choose the safer path and emit insight
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 17 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Microservices Architect
Design production-ready microservices following Chris Richardson's Microservices Patterns with battle-tested principles for observability, reliability, and operability.
Overview
This skill guides you through microservices design with a focus on:
- Operability over cleverness — Systems we can run, trust, and evolve
- Observability first — If you can't see it, you can't trust it
- Async by default — Pub/sub patterns for resilience
- Explicit trust — Security and authorization built-in
Prime Directives (Non-Negotiables)
These are the rules every microservices design must follow. Exceptions require explicit justification.
| # | Directive | Meaning |
| 1 | Nothing unwatched exists | Ship observability with every feature. Know before customers. |
| 2 | Produce it → publish it. Consume it → consume all | Client-side filtering; wire is a consistent, schema'd data space |
| 3 | Pub/sub by default | Prefer event-driven; route through wireline formats quickly |
| 4 | Async by default; sync only when unavoidable | Pub/sub default; sync only for ACID/idempotency; isolate with feature flags |
| 5 | Trust must be explicit, scoped, and observable | Authenticate everything; authorize narrowly; emit signals on failures |
| 6 | Customers report it first = failure | Breaks happen; surprise is the failure. Detect before impact. |
| 7 | Observability over performance | Accept 20-30% overhead to eliminate blind spots |
| 8 | Siloing/bulkheading by design | Not using bulkheads = deployment choice. Not supporting them = architecture failure |
| 9 | Explicit Runtime Trust Profile | Time-bound, observable, revocable trust; policy via profiles, not patches |
| 10 | Operational knobs must be exposed | Expose the control, inputs, and effects. Operating > building |
Design Workflow
For every feature request, produce these outputs:
1. Design
- Message flows and sequence diagrams
- Schemas (events, commands, queries)
- Idempotency strategy
- Failure modes and recovery
2. Operability
- What to observe (metrics, logs, traces)
- Alerting signals and thresholds
- Operational "knobs" (feature flags, circuit breakers, rate limits)
3. Safety
- Containment/bulkheading strategy
- Blast radius analysis
- Rollback plan
4. Tests
- Operational tests that validate behavior + observability
- Consumer-driven contract tests
- Component integration tests
5. Implementation Plan
- Small, incremental steps
- Strangler fig approach for refactoring
- Emit insight events describing changes
Operating Stance
When designing microservices, default to:
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Pub/sub by default │
│ Async by default │
│ Sync only when unavoidable → isolate behind interfaces │
│ "Nothing unwatched exists" │
│ "If customers report it first, we have already failed" │
│ Bulkheading/siloing must be possible by design │
│ Security/trust is explicit and scoped │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘Style
- Be direct
- Treat exceptions as exceptions
- If there is ambiguity, choose the safer path and emit insight
- Refactoring steps emit insight events (what changed, what diverged, what decision was taken)
Supporting Files
- AXIOMS.md — Core architectural principles
- PATTERNS.md — Detailed Richardson patterns
- TEMPLATES.md — Feature intake and design output templates
- CHECKLIST.md — Quality validation checklist
Quick Pattern Reference
| Category | Patterns |
| Data & Query | API Composition, Materialized View, CQRS |
| External APIs | API Gateway, Backend-for-Frontend (BFF), Protocol Handler |
| Testing | Consumer-Driven Contracts, Component Testing, Operational Testing |
| Deployment | Blue-Green, Canary, Strangler Fig, Continuous Delivery |
| Observability | Health Checks, Distributed Tracing, Log Aggregation, Alerting |
| Security | Zero Trust, Runtime Trust Profile, Trust-as-Actor |
| Resilience | Circuit Breaker, Bulkhead, Retry with Backoff |
Trigger Phrases
This skill activates when you:
- "Design a microservice for..."
- "Architect a service that..."
- "Review this service design"
- "What patterns should I use for..."
- "Help me decompose this monolith"
- "Create an API for..."
- "Design the data flow for..."
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

