agentleFS
NikoxkxNikoxkx/Agent-Skills/skills/data-analytics/etl-workflow-designer/SKILL.md

etl-workflow-designer

Skill1 starsChanged 5 months agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

Designs a complete ETL workflow diagram and implementation plan for a given data movement scenario. Use when planning how to move and transform data between source and destination systems.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

2 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈2

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Update pattern (append-only, CDC, full refresh)?

    line 34
  2. Distinctive:

    Document each transform with input → output example.

    line 50

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Overview

Produces a complete, professional ETL/ELT workflow design document and implementation plan for a specific data movement scenario. Includes source profiling questions, connector selection guide, transformation catalog, scheduling strategy, error handling matrix, monitoring, and a design document template with Mermaid diagrams that can be turned into working code.

When to Use This Skill

  • Planning a new data integration or migration project.
  • The user describes "move data from A to B" or "build a pipeline that...".
  • You need to create a design document before coding (good for alignment with stakeholders).

Prerequisites

  • Clear source(s) and destination(s).
  • Rough understanding of data volume, freshness requirements, and SLAs.
  • Access to documentation or sample data from the source system.

Steps

  1. Source profiling (ask these questions and document answers):
    • What is the source system and access method (API, DB, files, stream)?
    • Volume (rows/day, GB)?
    • Update pattern (append-only, CDC, full refresh)?
    • Schema stability?
    • Authentication / rate limits?
  2. Destination profiling:
    • Warehouse, lake, app DB, search index, etc.
    • Required freshness (real-time, hourly, daily)?
    • Query patterns (what will consume the data)?
  3. Connector & tool selection:
    • Batch: Airflow + Python, dbt, Fivetran, Stitch, custom scripts.
    • Streaming: Kafka, Kinesis, Debezium CDC, Spark Structured Streaming.
    • File: AWS Glue, Azure Data Factory, custom.
  4. Transformation catalog:
    • Filter, map/rename, join/enrich, aggregate, type cast, deduplicate, validate, mask/PII.
    • Document each transform with input → output example.
  5. Error handling matrix:
    • Transient (retry with backoff).
    • Data quality (quarantine + alert).
    • Schema drift (alert + fallback).
    • Permanent failure (DLQ + manual review).
  6. Scheduling & orchestration:
    • Cron, event-driven, dependency-based (Airflow DAG).
    • Watermark / incremental logic.
    • Backfill strategy.
  7. Monitoring & SLAs:
    • Freshness, volume, latency, data quality score.
    • Alerting channels and escalation.
  8. Output:
    • Design document (Markdown) with:
      • Context & requirements
      • Architecture diagram (Mermaid)
      • Data flow
      • Transformation list
      • Error handling table
      • Implementation phases & timeline
      • Risks & open questions
    • High-level code skeleton or Airflow DAG outline.
    • Next-step recommendations (prototype the extract first).

Examples

A complete design document for "Ingest Shopify orders + customers into Snowflake daily, with incremental logic, PII masking, and quality checks" including Mermaid architecture diagram, transformation catalog, error matrix, and 4-week implementation plan is included.

Edge Cases & Error Handling

  • Source downtime: Backpressure, queueing, or graceful degradation.
  • Schema evolution: Versioned schemas or automated drift detection.
  • Compliance (GDPR, HIPAA): Document data lineage and masking strategy.

Verification

  1. The design document is reviewed and approved by stakeholders (data + engineering + business).
  2. A small prototype of the critical path (extract → minimal transform → load) succeeds.
  3. The Mermaid diagram renders and accurately reflects the planned flow.
  4. Error scenarios are covered in the matrix with clear ownership.
  5. Success: The team has a clear, shared plan that can be implemented with minimal rework.

References

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.