fix-issues
Skill1 starsChanged 12 days agoMITView on GitHub
Fix all issues from a cross-validation review summary, a /review verdict, or a Greptile review. Use when the user says fix issues, fix these, fix the review findings, address the issues, or after /implement produces a cross-validation summary.
5 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- parf/ai-agent-bustheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- NemesLaszlo/Agent-Collectionword for word, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- FerroxLabs/waylandtheir own version, first seen Jun 7, 2026
- AI-Answer/Agent-Clubtheir own version, first seen Mar 29, 2026
- CES-Ltd/TitanXtheir own version, first seen Mar 29, 2026
Other versions5 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 1
- NemesLaszlo/Agent-Collection★ 1100% same
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 4
- FerroxLabs/wayland★ 606same name
- CES-Ltd/TitanX★ 47same name
- AI-Answer/Agent-Club★ 9same name
- parf/ai-agent-bus★ 1same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository16 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- before-and-afterSkill
- code-structureSkill
- cross-reviewSkill
- evidence-driven-testingSkill
- exploreSkill
- greploopSkill
- implementSkill
- investigateSkill
- new-featureSkill
- plan-featureSkill
- reviewSkill
- security-scanSkill
- shipSkill
- unslopSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
11 rules. 0 are common, 9 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 3 edited versions we read keep these.
9
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 20
If no arguments provided, find the most recent cross-validation summary, /review output, or /security-scan result in this conversation and …
- Distinctive: line 38
Read the file and understand the surrounding code
- Distinctive: line 40
Verify the fix doesn't break adjacent code
- Distinctive: line 53
Keep changes minimal and focused on the reported issue
- Distinctive: line 54
Don't refactor surrounding code unless it's part of the fix
- Distinctive: line 55
Follow existing patterns in the file
- Distinctive: line 56
If a fix requires changes in multiple files, make all related changes together
- Very specific: line 57
If a fix extracts logic shared by two or more callers, follow /code-structure: one extraction, one caller replaced, verified, then the rest
- Distinctive: line 61
After all fixes are applied:
- Distinctive: line 62
Run tests if they exist
- Distinctive: line 63
Do a quick scan of all modified files to ensure no regressions
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 3 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Context
- Current branch: !
git branch --show-current || true - Modified files: !
git status --short || true - Staged changes: !
git diff --cached --stat || true
Your Task
Fix all issues identified in the most recent cross-validation summary or code review.
Specific issues to fix: $ARGUMENTS
If no arguments provided, find the most recent cross-validation summary, /review output, or /security-scan result in this conversation and address all Must Fix and Should Fix items.
Fix Process
Step 1: Parse the issues
Extract all issues from the review summary. Categorize by file and type:
- Security issues (fix first)
- Bug/correctness issues
- Error handling gaps
- Code quality issues
- Performance issues
Step 2: Fix in order
For each issue:
- Read the file and understand the surrounding code
- Apply the fix following existing codebase patterns
- Verify the fix doesn't break adjacent code
- Move to the next issue
Agent Assignment:
- Backend file issues → use Backend Architect agent
- Frontend file issues → use Frontend Developer agent
- Cross-cutting or refactoring → use Clean Code Architect agent
- Security-specific fixes → ask the Security Vulnerability Scanner agent for the fix (it cannot edit files), then hand that fix to the Backend Architect or Frontend Developer that owns the file
Launch each agent through the Agent tool with its subagent_type (backend-architect, frontend-developer, clean-code-architect; security-vulnerability-scanner for guidance only) and give it the issue list for its files. Group issues by file so one agent handles one file. Do not apply fixes from the main context.
Fix Rules:
- Fix the actual issue — don't just suppress warnings
- Keep changes minimal and focused on the reported issue
- Don't refactor surrounding code unless it's part of the fix
- Follow existing patterns in the file
- If a fix requires changes in multiple files, make all related changes together
- If a fix extracts logic shared by two or more callers, follow
/code-structure: one extraction, one caller replaced, verified, then the rest
Step 3: Verify
After all fixes are applied:
- Run tests if they exist
- Do a quick scan of all modified files to ensure no regressions
- Re-capture evidence for any behavior the fixes changed (
/evidence-driven-testing)
Step 4: Report
## Fix Summary
### Issues Fixed
- [X/Y] Must Fix items resolved
- [X/Y] Should Fix items resolved
- [X/Y] Consider items addressed (if any)
### Changes Made
- `file:line` — [what was fixed]
### Issues Not Fixed (if any)
- [Issue] — [reason: needs human decision / out of scope / blocked by X]
### Verification
- Tests: [passed/failed/no tests]
- Regression check: [clean/issues found]
- Evidence: [path under .artifacts/ or "unchanged"]
### Next Step
`/evidence-driven-testing` if behavior changed, then `/ship`.Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

