implement
Skill1 starsChanged 11 days agoMITView on GitHub
Implement a validated feature plan task-by-task using Backend Architect and Frontend Developer agents, with progress tracking and user confirmation between tasks. After all tasks complete, automatically runs cross-model review (fable + opus). Use when the user says implement, build this, implement the plan, start implementation, or after /plan-feature produces a validated plan.
192 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- revisit-studies/studytheir own version, first seen Nov 9, 2026
- dz114879/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Dimon94/dveritytheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Dimon94/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- The-Vibe-Company/quivrtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- miklschmidt/archboardtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use setup-ts-deep-modules, ask-matt and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
liufeng1976Skillsetup-ts-deep-modules
Wire dependency-cruiser into a TypeScript repo so each package is a deep module — implementation hidden in subfolders, reachable only through its entry-point files. User-invoked.
Also in 43 projects that use this
GoogleSkillask-matt
Ask which skill or flow fits your situation. A router over the skills in this repo.
Also in 91 projects that use this
RoentekSkillloop-me
Grill me about specs for the workflows I want to build, within this workspace.
Also in 50 projects that use this
AWSSkillto-questionnaire
Turn a decision you can't fully answer into a questionnaire for someone else to fill in.
Also in 88 projects that use this
ryotaroh180105Skillclaude-handoff
Hand the current conversation off to a fresh background agent that picks up the work immediately.
Also in 42 projects that use this
GoogleSkillto-spec
Turn the current conversation into a spec and publish it to the project issue tracker — no interview, just synthesis of what you've already discussed.
Also in 168 projects that use this
- +3 more from google
Other versions192 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 1
- NemesLaszlo/claude-code-harness★ 1100% same
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 191
- mattpocock/skills★ 309ksame name
- QuivrHQ/quivr★ 40ksame name
- The-Vibe-Company/quivr★ 40ksame name
- foambubble/foam★ 17ksame name
- formbricks/formbricks★ 13ksame name
- ArcReel/ArcReel★ 6.3ksame name
- vinvcn/mattpocock-skills-zh-CN★ 5.5ksame name
- fallow-rs/fallow★ 5.3ksame name
- withcoral/coral★ 4.9ksame name
- bestofjs/bestofjs★ 3.1ksame name
181 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository16 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- before-and-afterSkill
- code-structureSkill
- cross-reviewSkill
- evidence-driven-testingSkill
- exploreSkill
- fix-issuesSkill
- greploopSkill
- investigateSkill
- new-featureSkill
- plan-featureSkill
- reviewSkill
- security-scanSkill
- shipSkill
- unslopSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
10 rules. 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 5 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 171 edited versions we read keep these.
5
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
5
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 21
If no arguments provided, look for the most recent validated feature plan in this conversation.
- Very specific: line 27
If the current branch is main or the repo's default branch, stop and tell the user to run /new-feature (or start the session with claude -w …
- Distinctive: line 52
Ask the user to confirm the plan before proceeding.
- Very specific: line 61
Capture the before state: when the task fixes a bug or changes visible behavior: reproduce it and save the capture under .artifacts/<task>/ …
- Distinctive: line 63
Use existing codebase patterns — read before writing
- Very specific: line 64
Keep domain rules in actions and reusable mechanics in the service layer (/code-structure)
- Distinctive: line 66
Run tests after each task if tests exist
- Very specific: line 95
After ALL implementation tasks are complete, automatically run /cross-review to perform the dual-model review (fable + opus in parallel).
- Distinctive: line 97
Before invoking, show the final implementation summary table:
- Very specific: line 111
Run /cross-review without asking.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 171 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Context
- Current branch: !
git branch --show-current || true - Recent changes: !
git log --oneline -5 || true - Modified files: !
git status --short || true
Your Task
You are implementing a validated feature plan task by task. Work through the phases in order.
Plan / Feature: $ARGUMENTS
If no arguments provided, look for the most recent validated feature plan in this conversation.
Phase 0: Isolation check
If the current branch is main or the repo's default branch, stop and tell the user to run /new-feature (or start the session with claude -w <task>) first. Never build on main.
Phase 1: Preparation
- Extract all tasks from the validated plan in implementation order
For each task, determine the assigned agent:
- Backend tasks (APIs, database, services, middleware, auth logic, data models, migrations) → Backend Architect agent
- Frontend tasks (components, UI, forms, routing, state management, styling) → Frontend Developer agent
- Infrastructure tasks (CI/CD, Docker, deployment) → DevOps Automator agent
- General code quality tasks (refactoring, shared utilities, cross-cutting concerns) → Clean Code Architect agent
Run each task in its agent: call the Agent tool with the matching
subagent_type(backend-architect,frontend-developer,devops-automator,clean-code-architect) and pass it the task, its files and the plan context. Do not do the task in the main context; the agent carries the model, tool limits and preloadedcode-structureskill.- Present the full task list as a table before starting:
## Implementation Plan
| # | Task | Agent | Status |
|---|------|-------|--------|
| 1 | [task description] | Backend Architect | Pending |
| 2 | [task description] | Frontend Developer | Pending |
| ... | ... | ... | ... |Ask the user to confirm the plan before proceeding.
Phase 2: Task-by-Task Implementation
For each task in order:
- Announce which task you're starting and which agent is handling it
- Capture the before state when the task fixes a bug or changes visible behavior: reproduce it and save the capture under
.artifacts/<task>/before touching code. It becomes the "before" half of the PR evidence. - Execute the task by launching the assigned agent through the Agent tool (see Phase 1), and in the delegation prompt tell it to:
- Use existing codebase patterns — read before writing
- Keep domain rules in actions and reusable mechanics in the service layer (
/code-structure) - Respect task dependencies — don't start a task until its dependencies are complete
- Run tests after each task if tests exist
- Summarize what was done by showing the updated progress table:
## Progress after Task #X: [task name]
### Changes Made
- `file/path.ext` — [what changed]
- `file/path.ext` — [what changed]
### Execution Summary
| # | Task | Agent | Status |
|---|------|-------|--------|
| 1 | [task description] | Backend Architect | Done |
| 2 | [task description] | Frontend Developer | Done |
| 3 | [task description] | Backend Architect | **Current** |
| 4 | [task description] | Frontend Developer | Pending |
| ... | ... | ... | ... |- Ask the user to confirm before proceeding to the next task: "Ready for Task #X+1?"
If blocked on a task: Report the blocker, skip to the next independent task, and note the skipped task.
Phase 3: Cross-model review (automatic)
After ALL implementation tasks are complete, automatically run /cross-review to perform the dual-model review (fable + opus in parallel).
Before invoking, show the final implementation summary table:
## Implementation Completed
| # | Task | Agent | Files Changed |
|---|------|-------|---------------|
| 1 | [task] | Backend Architect | `file1.ext`, `file2.ext` |
| 2 | [task] | Frontend Developer | `file3.ext` |
| ... | ... | ... | ... |Then run /cross-review which will produce the combined cross-validation summary.
Run /cross-review without asking. It is part of this skill, and skipping it leaves the change unreviewed.
Phase 4: Hand-off
Close with the next beats of the workflow:
/fix-issuesfor the must-fix and should-fix items/evidence-driven-testingto prove the change works (recording, scripted captures, or measured numbers)/shipto open the PR with the evidence, then/security-scanbefore deploying
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

