agentleFS
NemesLaszloNemesLaszlo/Agent-Collection/.claude/skills/implement/SKILL.md

implement

Skill1 starsChanged 11 days agoMITView on GitHub

Implement a validated feature plan task-by-task using Backend Architect and Frontend Developer agents, with progress tracking and user confirmation between tasks. After all tasks complete, automatically runs cross-model review (fable + opus). Use when the user says implement, build this, implement the plan, start implementation, or after /plan-feature produces a validated plan.

192 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use setup-ts-deep-modules, ask-matt and 10 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • liufeng1976Skill

    setup-ts-deep-modules

    Wire dependency-cruiser into a TypeScript repo so each package is a deep module — implementation hidden in subfolders, reachable only through its entry-point files. User-invoked.

    Also in 43 projects that use this

  • GoogleSkill

    ask-matt

    Ask which skill or flow fits your situation. A router over the skills in this repo.

    Also in 91 projects that use this

  • RoentekSkill

    loop-me

    Grill me about specs for the workflows I want to build, within this workspace.

    Also in 50 projects that use this

  • AWSSkill

    to-questionnaire

    Turn a decision you can't fully answer into a questionnaire for someone else to fill in.

    Also in 88 projects that use this

  • ryotaroh180105Skill

    claude-handoff

    Hand the current conversation off to a fresh background agent that picks up the work immediately.

    Also in 42 projects that use this

  • GoogleSkill

    to-spec

    Turn the current conversation into a spec and publish it to the project issue tracker — no interview, just synthesis of what you've already discussed.

    Also in 168 projects that use this

  • +3 more from google

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

10 rules. 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 5 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 171 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 5

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 5

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    If no arguments provided, look for the most recent validated feature plan in this conversation.

    line 21
  2. Very specific:

    If the current branch is main or the repo's default branch, stop and tell the user to run /new-feature (or start the session with claude -w …

    line 27
  3. Distinctive:

    Ask the user to confirm the plan before proceeding.

    line 52
  4. Very specific:

    Capture the before state: when the task fixes a bug or changes visible behavior: reproduce it and save the capture under .artifacts/<task>/ …

    line 61
  5. Distinctive:

    Use existing codebase patterns — read before writing

    line 63
  6. Very specific:

    Keep domain rules in actions and reusable mechanics in the service layer (/code-structure)

    line 64
  7. Distinctive:

    Run tests after each task if tests exist

    line 66
  8. Very specific:

    After ALL implementation tasks are complete, automatically run /cross-review to perform the dual-model review (fable + opus in parallel).

    line 95
  9. Distinctive:

    Before invoking, show the final implementation summary table:

    line 97
  10. Very specific:

    Run /cross-review without asking.

    line 111

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 171 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Context

  • Current branch: !git branch --show-current || true
  • Recent changes: !git log --oneline -5 || true
  • Modified files: !git status --short || true

Your Task

You are implementing a validated feature plan task by task. Work through the phases in order.

Plan / Feature: $ARGUMENTS

If no arguments provided, look for the most recent validated feature plan in this conversation.


Phase 0: Isolation check

If the current branch is main or the repo's default branch, stop and tell the user to run /new-feature (or start the session with claude -w <task>) first. Never build on main.

Phase 1: Preparation

  1. Extract all tasks from the validated plan in implementation order
  2. For each task, determine the assigned agent:

    • Backend tasks (APIs, database, services, middleware, auth logic, data models, migrations) → Backend Architect agent
    • Frontend tasks (components, UI, forms, routing, state management, styling) → Frontend Developer agent
    • Infrastructure tasks (CI/CD, Docker, deployment) → DevOps Automator agent
    • General code quality tasks (refactoring, shared utilities, cross-cutting concerns) → Clean Code Architect agent

    Run each task in its agent: call the Agent tool with the matching subagent_type (backend-architect, frontend-developer, devops-automator, clean-code-architect) and pass it the task, its files and the plan context. Do not do the task in the main context; the agent carries the model, tool limits and preloaded code-structure skill.

  3. Present the full task list as a table before starting:
## Implementation Plan

| # | Task | Agent | Status |
|---|------|-------|--------|
| 1 | [task description] | Backend Architect | Pending |
| 2 | [task description] | Frontend Developer | Pending |
| ... | ... | ... | ... |

Ask the user to confirm the plan before proceeding.


Phase 2: Task-by-Task Implementation

For each task in order:

  1. Announce which task you're starting and which agent is handling it
  2. Capture the before state when the task fixes a bug or changes visible behavior: reproduce it and save the capture under .artifacts/<task>/ before touching code. It becomes the "before" half of the PR evidence.
  3. Execute the task by launching the assigned agent through the Agent tool (see Phase 1), and in the delegation prompt tell it to:
    • Use existing codebase patterns — read before writing
    • Keep domain rules in actions and reusable mechanics in the service layer (/code-structure)
    • Respect task dependencies — don't start a task until its dependencies are complete
    • Run tests after each task if tests exist
  4. Summarize what was done by showing the updated progress table:
## Progress after Task #X: [task name]

### Changes Made
- `file/path.ext` — [what changed]
- `file/path.ext` — [what changed]

### Execution Summary

| # | Task | Agent | Status |
|---|------|-------|--------|
| 1 | [task description] | Backend Architect | Done |
| 2 | [task description] | Frontend Developer | Done |
| 3 | [task description] | Backend Architect | **Current** |
| 4 | [task description] | Frontend Developer | Pending |
| ... | ... | ... | ... |
  1. Ask the user to confirm before proceeding to the next task: "Ready for Task #X+1?"

If blocked on a task: Report the blocker, skip to the next independent task, and note the skipped task.


Phase 3: Cross-model review (automatic)

After ALL implementation tasks are complete, automatically run /cross-review to perform the dual-model review (fable + opus in parallel).

Before invoking, show the final implementation summary table:

## Implementation Completed

| # | Task | Agent | Files Changed |
|---|------|-------|---------------|
| 1 | [task] | Backend Architect | `file1.ext`, `file2.ext` |
| 2 | [task] | Frontend Developer | `file3.ext` |
| ... | ... | ... | ... |

Then run /cross-review which will produce the combined cross-validation summary.

Run /cross-review without asking. It is part of this skill, and skipping it leaves the change unreviewed.

Phase 4: Hand-off

Close with the next beats of the workflow:

  1. /fix-issues for the must-fix and should-fix items
  2. /evidence-driven-testing to prove the change works (recording, scripted captures, or measured numbers)
  3. /ship to open the PR with the evidence, then /security-scan before deploying

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.