agentleFS
NembieNembie/claude-code-skills/skills/code-reviewer/SKILL.md

code-reviewer

Skill3 starsChanged 9 months agoMITView on GitHub

Automated code review for security, performance, and maintainability. Use when asked for code review, security audit, quality check, PR review, or to find issues in code.

  • Reads credentials

182 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use git-doc-updater, git-precommit and 10 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • u9401066Skill

    git-doc-updater

    Auto-check and update key documentation before Git commits to keep docs in sync with code. Triggers: docs, 文檔, 更新文檔, sync docs, release, 發布.

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • u9401066Skill

    git-precommit

    Orchestrate pre-commit workflow including Memory Bank sync, README/CHANGELOG/ROADMAP updates. Triggers: GIT, gc, push, commit, 提交, 準備 commit, 要提交了, git commit, pre-commit, 推送.

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • JeffallanSkill

    shopify-expert

    Builds and debugs Shopify themes (.liquid files, theme.json, sections), develops custom Shopify apps (shopify.app.toml, OAuth, webhooks), and implements Storefront API integrations for headless storefronts. Use when building or customizing Shopify themes, creating Hydrogen or custom React storefronts, developing Shopify apps, implementing checkout UI extensions or Shopify Functions, optimizing performance, or integrating third-party services. Invoke for Liquid templating, Storefront API, app development, checkout customization, Shopify Plus features, App Bridge, Polaris, or Shopify CLI workflows.

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • JeffallanSkill

    spec-miner

    Reverse-engineering specialist that extracts specifications from existing codebases. Use when working with legacy or undocumented systems, inherited projects, or old codebases with no documentation. Invoke to map code dependencies, generate API documentation from source, identify undocumented business logic, figure out what code does, or create architecture documentation from implementation. Trigger phrases: reverse engineer, old codebase, no docs, no documentation, figure out how this works, inherited project, legacy analysis, code archaeology, undocumented features.

    Also in 6 projects that use this

  • +4 more from u9401066
  • +4 more from Jeffallan

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

2 rules. 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 155 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 1

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Before generating any output, read config/defaults.md and adapt all patterns, imports, and code examples to the user's configured stack.

    line 8
  2. Distinctive:

    Read all files in scope (specified files, PR diff, or project)

    line 12

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 155 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Code Reviewer

Before generating any output, read config/defaults.md and adapt all patterns, imports, and code examples to the user's configured stack.

Review Process

  1. Read all files in scope (specified files, PR diff, or project)
  2. Analyze each file against the review categories below
  3. Output structured findings with severity levels
  4. Provide actionable fix suggestions

Review Categories

Security

Injection Vulnerabilities

// BAD: SQL injection
const query = `SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = ${userId}`;

// GOOD: Parameterized query
const user = await prisma.user.findUnique({ where: { id: userId } });

XSS (Cross-Site Scripting)

// BAD: Rendering unsanitized HTML
<div dangerouslySetInnerHTML={{ __html: userContent }} />

// GOOD: Sanitize or use text content
<div>{sanitizeHtml(userContent)}</div>
// Or just render as text
<div>{userContent}</div>

Authentication Leaks

// BAD: Exposing sensitive data
return NextResponse.json({ user: { ...user, password: user.password } });

// GOOD: Exclude sensitive fields
const { password, ...safeUser } = user;
return NextResponse.json({ user: safeUser });

Hardcoded Secrets

// BAD
const API_KEY = 'sk-1234567890abcdef';

// GOOD
const API_KEY = process.env.API_KEY;

Path Traversal

// BAD: User-controlled file path
const filePath = `./uploads/${req.query.filename}`;

// GOOD: Validate and sanitize
const filename = path.basename(req.query.filename);
const filePath = path.join('./uploads', filename);

Performance

N+1 Queries

See prisma-query-optimizer skill for detection patterns.

Memory Leaks

// BAD: Event listener not cleaned up
useEffect(() => {
  window.addEventListener('resize', handleResize);
}, []);

// GOOD: Cleanup on unmount
useEffect(() => {
  window.addEventListener('resize', handleResize);
  return () => window.removeEventListener('resize', handleResize);
}, []);

Unbounded Operations

// BAD: Loading all records
const allUsers = await prisma.user.findMany();

// GOOD: Paginate
const users = await prisma.user.findMany({ take: 50, skip: offset });

Synchronous File I/O

// BAD: Blocks event loop
const data = fs.readFileSync('large-file.json');

// GOOD: Async I/O
const data = await fs.promises.readFile('large-file.json');

Maintainability

Magic Numbers

// BAD
if (status === 3) { ... }

// GOOD
const STATUS_COMPLETED = 3;
if (status === STATUS_COMPLETED) { ... }

// BETTER: Use enum or const object
const Status = { COMPLETED: 3 } as const;

Deep Nesting

// BAD: Arrow code
if (user) {
  if (user.isActive) {
    if (user.hasPermission('write')) {
      // ...
    }
  }
}

// GOOD: Early returns
if (!user) return;
if (!user.isActive) return;
if (!user.hasPermission('write')) return;
// ...

God Functions

Functions over 50 lines or with more than 5 parameters should be broken down.

Dead Code

Unused imports, unreachable code after return/throw, commented-out code blocks.

Naming Conventions

Inconsistent Naming

// BAD: Mixed styles
const user_name = '...';
const userEmail = '...';
const UserAge = 25;

// GOOD: Consistent camelCase for variables
const userName = '...';
const userEmail = '...';
const userAge = 25;

Unclear Names

// BAD
const d = new Date();
const arr = users.filter(u => u.a);

// GOOD
const createdAt = new Date();
const activeUsers = users.filter(user => user.isActive);

Error Handling

Swallowed Errors

// BAD: Silent failure
try {
  await saveData();
} catch (e) {
  // Nothing
}

// GOOD: Log or handle
try {
  await saveData();
} catch (error) {
  console.error('Failed to save:', error);
  throw error; // Or handle appropriately
}

Generic Catch

// BAD: Catches everything including programming errors
try {
  doSomething();
} catch (e) {
  return defaultValue;
}

// GOOD: Catch specific errors
try {
  doSomething();
} catch (error) {
  if (error instanceof NetworkError) {
    return defaultValue;
  }
  throw error;
}

Test Coverage Gaps

Untested Edge Cases

Flag functions that handle:

  • Null/undefined inputs without tests
  • Empty arrays/objects without tests
  • Error conditions without tests
  • Boundary values without tests

Missing Integration Tests

API routes and database operations should have integration tests.

Output Format

## Code Review Report

### Critical (must fix before merge)
| Severity | File | Line | Issue | Category |
|----------|------|------|-------|----------|
| CRITICAL | src/api/users.ts | 45 | SQL injection vulnerability | Security |

**Details:**
- Issue: User input directly interpolated into query string
- Fix: Use parameterized queries via Prisma
```typescript
// Before
const query = `SELECT * FROM users WHERE email = '${email}'`;

// After
const user = await prisma.user.findUnique({ where: { email } });

Warnings (should fix)

SeverityFileLineIssueCategory
WARNINGsrc/hooks/useData.ts23Missing cleanup in useEffectPerformance

Info (suggestions)

SeverityFileLineIssueCategory
INFOsrc/utils/format.ts12Magic number should be named constantMaintainability

Summary

  • Critical: X issues
  • Warnings: X issues
  • Info: X issues
  • Files reviewed: X

## Severity-Based Prioritization

After completing the review, sort all findings by severity. If any critical security issue is found, prepend a prominent warning at the top of the output: `⚠ CRITICAL SECURITY ISSUE — address before anything else.` Do not bury critical findings in a long list of minor style suggestions. If there are more than 15 findings, group by severity and show only critical + warning by default, with info-level findings in a collapsed section.

## Reference

See `references/review-checklist.md` for the complete review criteria organized by category.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.