agentleFS
NatchpaiNatchpai/Hardware-Copilot/.claude/skills/part-spec-table/SKILL.md

part-spec-table

Skill0 starsChanged 17 days agoMITView on GitHub

Builds or updates a Markdown table that compares the specs of candidate parts, one column per part number. Use when the user asks for a spec comparison table, or wants to add a part number to an existing one. Not for choosing the part or price and stock.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

12 rules. About 0 are common, 8 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈8

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 4

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Never invent a value. Never open or read a PDF.

    line 17
  2. Distinctive:

    Put the source in the cell or in a short source list under the table (manufacturer page, datasheet section, user message).

    line 23
  3. Distinctive:

    Do not mix recommended operating values with absolute maximum values.

    line 25
  4. Very specific:

    Write the file only when the user asks.

    line 28
  5. Very specific:

    Never shorten the spec table to "key rows" unless the user asks.

    line 31
  6. Distinctive:

    Keep one record per topic.

    line 33
  7. Very specific:

    Add rows from the project spec (SEN-*, PWR-*, ...) when they apply.

    line 45
  8. Distinctive:

    If the user adds a part, add a column and fill its cells.

    line 48
  9. Distinctive:

    Write simple, direct English, like one engineer talking to another.

    line 65
  10. Distinctive:

    Avoid fancy words, marketing phrases and AI-style filler.

    line 66
  11. Very specific:

    Do not use the em dash (—).

    line 67
  12. Distinctive:

    Do not reword existing text that is already clear and correct.

    line 68

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Part Spec Table

Make one table. One column per part, one row per spec. Keep it simple.

Rules

  • Never invent a value. Never open or read a PDF. Datasheet values come from the user, official manufacturer web pages, or NotebookLM answers with cited text, used only after the user approves uploading the file. If the project has .claude/rules/engineering.md, follow its "Datasheet evidence" section.
  • Mark every cell with an evidence label: VERIFIED, ASSUMED, ESTIMATED, NOT_VERIFIED. If no source is known, write NOT_VERIFIED. Leave no blank.
  • Put the source in the cell or in a short source list under the table (manufacturer page, datasheet section, user message).
  • Do not mix recommended operating values with absolute maximum values. Name which one a row holds.
  • Say which row decides the choice. Do not pick a winner unless asked.
  • Write the file only when the user asks. Save it in the KiCad project's existing documents folder (near the .kicad_pro). If there is none, or more than one, ask once. Do not edit KiCad files.
  • Never shorten the spec table to "key rows" unless the user asks. Keep every row and every NOT_VERIFIED cell. A summary may add to the table, not replace it.
  • Keep one record per topic. If a file for the topic exists, update it. Do not split into extra files or delete files unless the user asks.
  • Table format: pad the first column of every table to the width of its longest cell (header included), so the source lines up. Match the dashes in the separator row to that width. Leave the other columns unpadded.

Steps

  1. Get the part numbers (exact orderable MPN) and the use case. Ask only if missing.
  2. Pick the rows that matter for the use case (usually 15 to 25). Always include: status, interface, supply range (VDD and I/O), package and size, footprint match to the main candidate, operating temperature, the key performance numbers, and a driver or software support row when it applies. Add rows from the project spec (SEN-*, PWR-*, ...) when they apply. Reuse the rows of an existing table so columns stay comparable.
  3. Fill each cell from a source. Keep units. Use the same unit in a row.
  4. If the user adds a part, add a column and fill its cells. Keep the other columns unchanged.
  5. List what is still NOT_VERIFIED below the table and how to close it.

Table shape

| Parameter      | <MPN 1> | <MPN 2> | (new P/N) |
| -------------- | --- | --- | --- |
| Manufacturer   | name | name | |
| Product status | Production `VERIFIED` | `NOT_VERIFIED` | |
| Supply range   | 1.71 to 3.6 V `VERIFIED` | `NOT_VERIFIED` | |
| Package        | LGA-14 2.5x3 mm `VERIFIED` | ... | |

Writing style

  • Write simple, direct English, like one engineer talking to another. Use everyday words, short sentences and active voice.
  • Avoid fancy words, marketing phrases and AI-style filler. Keep standard engineering terms and exact identifiers.
  • Do not use the em dash (—). Use a period, comma, colon or parentheses.
  • Do not reword existing text that is already clear and correct.
  • Priority: technical accuracy, then clarity, then brevity, then style.

Output

The table, the source list, and a short list of NOT_VERIFIED cells. No long text.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.