knowledge-processor
Skill2 starsChanged 3 days agoMITView on GitHub
Reconcile useful new information with scoped knowledge and retrieve relevant context before dependent work. Shared continuity infrastructure for all work; no software workflow or user repository is required for project knowledge.
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. About 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 5 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈0
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
5
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 17
Read and follow framework/work-principle.md before taking up work.
- Very specific: line 40
When a user scope is configured or the project's rules require ongoing knowledge maintenance: read and follow …
- Very specific: line 48
Before an answer, update or dependent continuation that needs stored context: read and follow skills/knowledge_processor/retrieve.md …
- Very specific: line 54
Before admitting, writing, correcting, moving or removing a claim: read and follow skills/knowledge_processor/write.md (§2 admit, scope and …
- Very specific: line 60
When writing history or the handoff, importing sources, or restructuring (splitting, merging or renaming) owners: read and follow …
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 308,232 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Read and follow framework/work-principle.md before taking up work.
Resolve this reference against the framework root; retain the consumer CWD.
Knowledge Processor
Canonical semantic lifecycle for knowledge and continuity. Modes specialize this contract; boot, save and housekeeping invoke it. No database, hook, background worker, automatic import or development engine is implied.
Inputs and scope
Input: candidate information or retrieval need, active project, configured user
scope if any, and mode process, user-signal or wrap-up. Resolve location and
permissions through framework/user-scope.md. Project knowledge belongs to its
verified project/topic owner; private person facts only to the resolved
<user_repo>/context/user/. No user scope: project continuity still works; report
unroutable person facts, never create a profile or private fallback in the project.
A visiting agent retains its own user identity and follows the visited project's
entry and authorization rules without adopting another person's profile.
Continuous maintenance
When a user scope is configured or the project's rules require ongoing knowledge maintenance: read and follow
skills/knowledge_processor/continuous-maintenance.md at boot and after compaction (authority, same-cycle
reconciliation, checkpoint before a topic switch, update-not-append, the FACTS line, blocked writes).
Executable lifecycle
1. Retrieve and establish a coherent baseline
Before an answer, update or dependent continuation that needs stored context: read and follow
skills/knowledge_processor/retrieve.md (verified owner and baseline, bounded search and its stop, using what was
retrieved).
2.–5. Admit, place, validate and publish
Before admitting, writing, correcting, moving or removing a claim: read and follow
skills/knowledge_processor/write.md (§2 admit, scope and compare; §3 place and curate; §4 validity and provenance;
§5 bounded impact and protected publication).
6. History, imports and maintenance
When writing history or the handoff, importing sources, or restructuring (splitting, merging or renaming) owners:
read and follow skills/knowledge_processor/history-imports.md.
Modes and outcome
process:modes/process.md— project facts/impact; routes person facts separately.user-signal:modes/user-signal.md— personal placement under the shared lifecycle.wrap-up:modes/wrap-up.md— common continuity/history, selected domain contribution.
DONE: admitted deltas reconciled at authorized owners, routes/current views coherent, pending operation clear, and actual outcome verified. No-change PRESENT is success. FAIL: report unavailable scope, evidence, coherent snapshot or pending recovery; retain recoverable work in its scope, never claim completion on partial persistence. Close-phase retros supply their Patterns-Emerged as process input; do not re-extract raw sessions. Selected development closeout audit obligations remain domain-owned.
Incident handling: collect observations and locate/assess impact; defer transient current-state replacement until the incident's recovery/fix boundary. Preserve necessary incident checkpoints and approvals under local incident rules. Afterwards reconcile observed end state and relevant failed attempts. No live action is implicitly authorized by knowledge maintenance.
In this repository85 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- adversary-test-planSkill
- api-and-interface-designSkill
- architecture-coherence-reviewSkill
- bedrock-drillSkill
- cavemanSkill
- code-review-boardSkill
- consistency-checkSkill
- councilSkill
- cross-spec-consistency-checkSkill
- deprecation-and-migrationSkill
- documentation-and-adrsSkill
- frameSkill
- frontend-design-ttySkill
- frontend-ui-engineeringSkill
- get-api-docsSkill
- impl-plan-reviewSkill
- improve-codebase-architectureSkill
- knowledge-captureSkill
- knowledge-processorSkill
- pre-build-spec-auditSkill
- retroactive-spec-updateSkill
- root-cause-fixSkill
- scopingSkill
- sectional-deep-reviewSkill
- security-and-hardeningSkill
- session-diagnosisSkill
- shipping-and-launchSkill
- show-open-tasksSkill
- source-spec-reduceSkill
- spec-authoringSkill
- spec-boardSkill
- task-creationSkill
- task-status-updateSkill
- testingSkill
- transparency-headerSkill
- ux-authoringSkill
- workflow-routerSkill
- youtube-subtitlesSkill
- adversary-test-planSkill
- api-and-interface-designSkill
- architecture-coherence-reviewSkill
- bedrock-drillSkill
- cavemanSkill
- close-retroSkill
- code-review-boardSkill
- consistency-checkSkill
- convergence-loopSkill
- councilSkill
- cross-spec-consistency-checkSkill
- deprecation-and-migrationSkill
- documentation-and-adrsSkill
- frameSkill
- frontend-design-ttySkill
- frontend-ui-engineeringSkill
- get-api-docsSkill
- impl-plan-reviewSkill
- improve-codebase-architectureSkill
- knowledge-captureSkill
- The first 60 shown.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
Reviews can't be read right now.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

