agentleFS
NagacashNagacash/nagacodex-factory-skill/evidence-driven-testing/SKILL.md

evidence-driven-testing

Skill1 starsChanged 58 days agoMITView on GitHub

Records visual proof while testing UI behavior — the agent tests the app hands-on via computer use while a screen recording with structured test/assertion annotations captures the session — then posts the video and a results summary to the PR and tracker issue. Use whenever a change needs verifiable evidence that it works, instead of prose claims — including headless environments (scripted screenshots and probes) and non-UI changes (measured numbers, output pairs).

9 other projects use a version of this, 7 of them edited; 2 new projects in the last 4 weeks, against 1 the 4 before.

Adopted by

Rising: 2 new projects took it in the last 4 weeks, 2× the 4 weeks before.thin data

Week of Sep 13: 1 new projectWeek of Sep 20: 0 new projectsWeek of Sep 27: 0 new projectsWeek of Oct 4: 0 new projectsWeek of Oct 11: 2 new projectsWeek of Oct 18: 0 new projectsWeek of Oct 25: 0 new projectsWeek of Nov 1: 0 new projects
Sep 2026Oct 2026Nov 2026
New projects taking a version of this file each week, over the 8 weeks our latest run read: only 3 in all, so this is a hint, not a trend.

Most recently taken up by

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

16 rules. 4 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 9 are very specific to this project.

  • 4

    Common

    Most of the 7 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 3

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 9

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    If the harness has no computer-use tools but a GUI exists, drive the app with cua-driver instead (see below) — it is still your live …

    line 24
  2. Very specific:

    Fallback recorders: when doctor reports no capture source (for example Wayland without wf-recorder): cua-driver recording start <dir> / …

    line 75
  3. Very specific:

    Add a setup annotation describing the starting context:

    line 113
  4. Very specific:

    After each check, add an assertion annotation with --result passed, failed, or untested:

    line 133
  5. Common:

    Use "Precondition: ..." assertions to establish starting state.

    line 143
  6. Distinctive:

    Keep under 80 characters, high-signal (the recorder rejects longer messages).

    line 144
  7. Very specific:

    If a test cannot run (missing prerequisite, expired auth window), mark it untested with the reason — never skip silently.

    line 145
  8. Common:

    Stop recording after the final assertion:

    line 151
  9. Common:

    Never record a half-covered or tiled window — maximize first.

    line 192
  10. Very specific:

    Never record a screen showing secrets, tokens, customer data, or payment details.

    line 193
  11. Common:

    When verifying a fix, show or reference the old failure alongside the new success.

    line 195
  12. Very specific:

    Always state the exact commit/branch/deployment tested against.

    line 196
  13. Distinctive:

    When a display exists but the agent has no built-in computer-use capability, use cua-driver (macOS / Windows / Linux) as the actuator.

    line 200
  14. Very specific:

    Verify the setup with cua-driver doctor before recording.

    line 205
  15. Very specific:

    If no annotation overlay is available on this path, keep the protocol as files: an assertions.md listing each test_start / assertion with …

    line 225
  16. Distinctive:

    When the agent has no desktop to record, keep the same assertion discipline.

    line 231

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 7 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Evidence-Driven Testing

Record annotated proof of behavior, then attach it to the PR and tracker issue.

The recording is the capture of you testing the app via computer use: start the recorder, then drive the app yourself — click, type, navigate — through each test target. Every action in the video is the test being performed live; the recording has no value as evidence unless it shows that interactive session. If the harness has no computer-use tools but a GUI exists, drive the app with cua-driver instead (see below) — it is still your live session.

The bundled recorder, scripts/evidence.py, captures the display with FFmpeg on Linux, macOS, and Windows, timestamps each annotation you add while testing, burns them into the video on stop, and verifies the result with ffprobe. It writes evidence.mp4, report.md, and manifest.json into the session folder.

Inputs

  • Test targets (required): The behaviors/flows to verify, phrased as testable statements.
  • PR / issue (optional): Where to post the evidence. If omitted, deliver to the requester only.

The recorder

EVIDENCE below means the path to scripts/evidence.py inside this skill's folder (wherever the skill is installed, e.g. ~/.claude/skills/evidence-driven-testing/scripts/evidence.py). It needs only Python 3 and FFmpeg.

  • Check first: python3 $EVIDENCE doctor — verifies ffmpeg, ffprobe, libx264, and the ass filter (ready), then which screen-capture source works on this machine (capture_ready and the source auto will pick). Exits non-zero only when the toolchain is missing; read capture_ready before recording.
  • Platforms (--source auto picks the first available):

    OSSourceNeeds
    Linux X11 / XWaylandx11 (x11grab)DISPLAY set
    Linux Waylandwayland (wf-recorder)WAYLAND_DISPLAY set, wf-recorder on PATH, and a compositor confirmed to support wlr-screencopy — either a known wlroots one (Sway, Hyprland, river, Wayfire, labwc, dwl, niri) or verified via wayland-info. GNOME and KDE Wayland are not capturable this way; doctor says so. Use x11 through XWayland for X11 apps, or a fallback recorder. --source wayland still forces it
    macOSavfoundationScreen Recording permission granted to the terminal / agent host app; doctor lists screen indexes for --screen-index
    Windowsgdigrabany standard ffmpeg build; powershell for process checks

    Capture is the full screen by default; --geometry WxH and --offset X,Y crop a region on x11, wayland, and gdigrab. XWayland only sees X11 windows, so prefer the wayland source when the app under test is Wayland-native.

  • Crash-safe raw capture: the raw recording is MPEG-TS (raw.ts), so if the recorder is killed hard or crashes, what was captured still probes and renders. stop remuxes or re-encodes it into a standard evidence.mp4.
  • How stopping works: on Linux the recorder is signalled through a pidfd. On macOS and Windows start launches a small supervisor process that owns the ffmpeg child, and stop asks it (via stop.request in the session folder) to interrupt, then terminate, then kill; it writes recorder-exit.json when done. Nothing ever signals a bare PID, so a recycled PID can't be hit. If the supervisor dies while the recorder is still running, stop refuses and tells you which PID to stop by hand. If it died before it could even record which process it started, stop stays blocked until you have checked for a stray recorder yourself and rerun it with --accept-untracked-recorder; the report then carries that caveat.
  • Fallback recorders when doctor reports no capture source (for example Wayland without wf-recorder): cua-driver recording start <dir> / stop (see the cua-driver section), or the OS recorder (macOS: screencapture -v out.mov). On these paths there is no annotation overlay, so keep the annotation protocol as files — an assertions.md listing each setup / test_start / assertion with its result and the approximate video timestamp, exactly as in the headless path.
  • Never present --source test (the synthetic pattern generator) as UI evidence. It exists to smoke-test the toolchain; the repo's tests/test_evidence.py exercises it.

Instructions

1. Prepare the screen

  • Maximize the browser/app window; close popups, notifications, and extra panels.
  • Navigate to the starting state (logged in, correct page) BEFORE recording, unless setup itself is under test.
  • Note the exact revision under test: git rev-parse HEAD and git branch --show-current (or the deployment URL) — the recorder stamps them into the report.

2. Start recording

  • Begin the screen recording before the first meaningful action:

    python3 $EVIDENCE start \
      --output .artifacts/<task-name> \
      --title "<what is being verified>" \
      --commit "$(git rev-parse HEAD)" --branch "$(git branch --show-current)" \
      --environment "<OS / browser / display / deployment>"

    It prints JSON with a session path and the chosen source; keep the path (SESSION=...) for every later command. The source is auto-detected and the whole screen is captured; pass --source, --geometry, --offset, --display/--xauthority (X11), --screen-index (macOS), or --output-name (Wayland) only when doctor or the situation calls for it.

  • Add a setup annotation describing the starting context:

    python3 $EVIDENCE annotate "$SESSION" --type setup \
      --message "Logged in, navigating to connectors page"

3. Test via computer use, annotating as you go

  • Perform every interaction through computer use on the live app — the recording captures your session, so the testing and the evidence are the same act. Work at a watchable pace: let the UI settle after each action so state changes are visible on video.
  • At each named test's start, add a test_start annotation in Jest style:

    python3 $EVIDENCE annotate "$SESSION" --type test_start \
      --message "It should execute the tool directly when permission is 'always'"
  • After each check, add an assertion annotation with --result passed, failed, or untested:

    python3 $EVIDENCE annotate "$SESSION" --type assertion --result passed \
      --message "Tool ran without a permission prompt"
  • Rules for assertions:
    • One assertion per meaningful state change — consolidate, don't annotate per UI label.
    • Use "Precondition: ..." assertions to establish starting state.
    • Keep under 80 characters, high-signal (the recorder rejects longer messages).
    • If a test cannot run (missing prerequisite, expired auth window), mark it untested with the reason — never skip silently.
    • The timestamp records when you asserted, not whether it was true — look at the screen before choosing passed.

4. Stop and review

  • Stop recording after the final assertion:

    python3 $EVIDENCE stop "$SESSION"

    This stops the capture (gracefully, so the recorder flushes; escalating only if it ignores the request), burns the annotations into evidence.mp4, probes the result, and writes report.md and manifest.json next to it. It prints "verified": true on success; if rendering fails the session is marked finalization_failed — fix the reported cause and run stop again (a retry does not signal the recorder twice). If the recorder process can no longer be signalled safely (it died, or its PID now belongs to another process), the session is marked recorder_lost. Running stop again finalizes whatever video was captured, but only once that recorder process is confirmed gone — if it is still alive, stop it first, or the video would be rendered while still being written.

  • Confirm the recording captured the key moments before sharing: extract a frame at each assertion timestamp (ffmpeg -ss <t> -i evidence.mp4 -frames:v 1 frame.png) and check the state and the label are visible.
  • Fill in the Caveats section of report.md; never leave the placeholder.

5. Post the evidence

  • report.md is the report: what was tested, environment + exact commit, pass/fail per test, caveats. Extend it rather than rewriting from scratch.
  • Post the video + summary as a PR comment (embed in the PR description if it's your PR). gh pr comment cannot attach a local video — upload evidence.mp4 through the PR's comment box in an authenticated browser, or upload it to a host and link it (for example the before-and-after upload adapters). Reopen the comment and confirm the video plays before claiming it is posted.
  • Attach the same video to the tracker issue (Linear/Jira) with a one-line result.
  • Send the report + recording to the requester.

Guardrails

  • The video must show the actual test session being driven live. Never present scripted playback, stitched clips, or synthetic footage as a recording; if the harness lacks computer-use tools but a GUI exists, drive via cua-driver; with no GUI at all, use the headless path instead.
  • Never record a half-covered or tiled window — maximize first.
  • Never record a screen showing secrets, tokens, customer data, or payment details; if a flow requires them, mark it untested and say why.
  • When verifying a fix, show or reference the old failure alongside the new success.
  • Always state the exact commit/branch/deployment tested against.

No computer-use tools? Drive with cua-driver (GUI available)

When a display exists but the agent has no built-in computer-use capability, use cua-driver (macOS / Windows / Linux) as the actuator. It is still you testing the app live — the recording rule holds unchanged; only the input mechanism differs.

  • Verify the setup with cua-driver doctor before recording. If a cua-driver skill is installed, read it and follow its protocol — the snapshot-before-action invariant is mandatory.
  • Loop per interaction: launch_app → get_window_state (accessibility tree
    • screenshot) → act via element_token (click, type_text, press_key) → verify_state for the expected postcondition. Each verify_state check maps 1:1 onto an assertion annotation.
  • Wherever doctor reports capture_ready: yes, keep using the bundled recorder above for the video and the annotations; cua-driver only supplies the input.
  • Otherwise, cua-driver recording start <output-dir> / cua-driver recording stop is the recorder (the output directory is required, and the daemon must be running: cua-driver serve). Video capture is on by default and is finalized to <output-dir>/recording.mp4 on stop — but on Windows/Linux it shells out to ffmpeg, so a missing ffmpeg or display yields only the per-turn trajectory folders (before/after screenshots, action.json, click.png), no video. After stopping, verify recording.mp4 exists before citing it; if it is absent, fix the recorder or present the per-turn before/after screenshots as numbered captures per the headless protocol.
  • If no annotation overlay is available on this path, keep the protocol as files: an assertions.md listing each test_start / assertion with its result, exactly as in the headless path.

Headless path (no GUI available)

When the agent has no desktop to record, keep the same assertion discipline; swap the recorder for scripted capture:

  • Save everything to .artifacts/<task-name>/ (gitignore it — evidence gets uploaded, never committed). Keep the capture script beside the captures so the run is repeatable.
  • Screenshots: the before-and-after CLI (@vercel/before-and-after) captures URLs or elements and its pairs feed PR embeds directly. In containers/VMs where Chrome fails with "No usable sandbox", set AGENT_BROWSER_ARGS="--no-sandbox".
  • Video / multi-step flows: a one-off Playwright script, run without adding playwright to the project's dependencies:

    npx --yes --package=playwright node record.mjs

    (Plain npx playwright node record.mjs fails — node is not a Playwright CLI command; --package=playwright is what puts the module on the path.) Minimal record.mjs:

    import { chromium } from "playwright";
    const browser = await chromium.launch();
    const context = await browser.newContext({
      recordVideo: { dir: ".artifacts/<task-name>/" },
    });
    const page = await context.newPage();
    await page.goto("http://localhost:3000/path-under-test");
    // ...drive the flow, one meaningful state change per step...
    await context.close(); // finalizes the .webm
    await browser.close();

    Trim or compress with ffmpeg if the file is large.

  • The annotation protocol becomes files: number captures in test order with the assertion in the name — 01-precondition-signed-in.png, 02-it-saves-on-blur-passed.png — and keep an assertions.md in the artifacts folder listing each test_start / assertion with its result (passed / failed / untested + reason).

Non-UI changes still need evidence

  • API / performance: a scripted probe with measured numbers — request counts per phase, latency before/after — captured to probe-output.txt.
  • Rendering / canvas / shader: rendered frames plus pixel assertions (diff values), reviewed by eye and saved as PNGs.
  • Agent behavior: the relevant transcript excerpt showing the tool call and response.
  • Bug fixes: reproduce and capture the failure before writing the fix — that capture is the "before" half of a before/after pair.

Capture hygiene

  • Confirm the server you're probing is running your code (right port, right process), especially when multiple agents share a machine: lsof -i :<port> — or where lsof isn't installed, ss -ltnp "sport = :<port>" to find the listener's PID, then ps -p <pid> -o args= to confirm it's yours.
  • Evidence complements the repo's checks (typecheck/build/tests); it never replaces them.
  • Hand before/after media pairs to a before/after tool for the PR embed (e.g. before-and-after before.png after.png --markdown).

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.