deliberate
Skill4 starsChanged 49 days agoMITView on GitHub
Use for governed fixed-option decisions that require named seats, fixed quorum, hard attempt/deadline bounds, durable replay, or explicit human approval/cancel boundaries.
5 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- taipt1504/claudehuttheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- cekrauseee/harnesstheir own version, first seen Oct 20, 2026
- JosefGisis/skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 20, 2026
- warrenwhipple/decision-flowtheir own version, first seen Jul 17, 2026
- samuelfarkas/skillstheir own version, first seen Jul 13, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use review.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
SentrySkillreview
Fixture review skill.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions5 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 5
- samuelfarkas/skills★ 4same name
- taipt1504/claudehut★ 2same name
- JosefGisis/skills★ 1same name
- warrenwhipple/decision-flow★ 1same name
- cekrauseee/harness★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
3 rules. 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 3 edited versions we read keep these.
0
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
3
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 15
Use /deliberate when a decision has explicit options and named seats and must be bounded by quorum, physical attempts, an absolute …
- Very specific: line 17
Use /summon for ordinary dispatch, manifest/fan-out, and council work.
- Very specific: line 20
Before invoking it, obtain—not infer—the question, 2–10 seat IDs, at least two option IDs, quorum, rounds, maximum physical attempts, …
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 3 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Deliberate — governed decisions for Summon
/deliberate is the focused companion entry point for Summon's governed-decision
workflow. It owns no scheduler, scripts, schemas, or duplicate policy. Read the
canonical guide at ../summon/references/deliberation.md before constructing,
inspecting, recovering, or resuming a run.
Use /deliberate when a decision has explicit options and named seats and must be
bounded by quorum, physical attempts, an absolute deadline, and a durable journal.
Use /summon for ordinary dispatch, manifest/fan-out, and council work. Council
remains the right choice for cross-examination and a chairman's synthesis.
Before invoking it, obtain—not infer—the question, 2–10 seat IDs, at least two option IDs, quorum, rounds, maximum physical attempts, deadline, human-approval policy, private durable run directory, and each seat's authority/consent/worktree evidence. If any of those facts are missing, ask the user or choose another mode.
The CLI is the same dispatcher:
../summon/scripts/run_subagent.py deliberate --question "…" --seats A,B \
--options X,Y --quorum all --rounds 1 --max-attempts 2 --deadline 30m \
--run-dir <private-runs-root> --cwd <project>The fresh provider path is limited to an explicit quorum, one round, one physical
attempt per seat, and enforceable read-only subprocess seats with executable
evidence. Unsupported configurations refuse before provider contact; the lane
never silently retries, falls back, or changes mode. The example's two seats
therefore use --max-attempts 2. These are runtime admission constraints, not
proof of current provider availability or served-model identity.
deliberate resume and human approval remain integration_pending. status,
replay, recover, cancel, and open are provider-inert. An unmatched physical
start is uncertain_spend; --retry-indeterminate only acknowledges that
uncertainty and does not activate the gated resume path or grant launch permission.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

