making-a-pr
Skill49 starsChanged 21 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Use when creating or updating a sphinx-llm pull request.
In this repository2 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- resolve-issueSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈3
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 21
After the PR exists, infer its Read the Docs preview links from the PR number, the project's preview URL pattern, and the changed …
- Distinctive: line 32
Create the PR with the available evidence, then add the inferred preview links once its number is known.
- Very specific: line 40
Use the template below. Start the body with a short, plain-language description of what changed and why it adds value to sphinx-llm, …
- Distinctive: line 48
After creating or updating the PR, inspect the published body and check that links and images work.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Making a PR
Prepare the evidence
- Inspect the full diff against the PR's base branch. Identify the change's value to the project, the detailed changes, and whether extension behavior or rendered appearance changes. Done when: the summary and change list account for the full PR scope.
- For changes to extension functionality, add or update an example in the
main documentation under
docs/source/that actually uses the affected functionality. Configuration or API reference text alone is insufficient; reviewers should be able to see the behavior demonstrated in the docs. Build the documentation to check the example. Done when: the documentation demonstrates the changed behavior and the build succeeds, or a build blocker is explicitly recorded. - After the PR exists, infer its Read the Docs preview links from the PR number, the project's preview URL pattern, and the changed documentation paths. Add these links in a follow-up edit to the PR body, pointing directly to relevant example pages or sections, including generated artifacts when those are what changed. Once the preview is built, verify the links and that the content matches the current changes. For visual changes, capture screenshots of the affected preview pages and embed them in the PR with descriptive captions. Include before-and-after views when useful. Done when: the contributor has added and verified the live example links and, for visual changes, embedded screenshots from the preview build.
Create the PR with the available evidence, then add the inferred preview links once its number is known. Mark the links as awaiting verification while the build is pending. If the preview fails or is unavailable, state the blocker and what remains to verify; keep those items outstanding. Use screenshots from the preview build and distinguish inferred links from verified ones.
Write and verify the PR
Use the template below. Start the body with a short, plain-language description of what changed and why it adds value to sphinx-llm, followed by a detailed bullet list of changes. Replace all placeholders and omit inapplicable sections. Retain documentation examples for functionality changes and screenshots for visual changes, or explicitly explain the outstanding blocker.
Record checks actually run and their results. If using gh, write the body to
a temporary file and pass it with --body-file to preserve Markdown formatting.
After creating or updating the PR, inspect the published body and check that
links and images work. Update preview evidence after further changes when it
no longer represents the PR.
Done when: the published PR follows the requested format, its evidence matches the current changes, and any unavailable evidence is clearly marked.
PR body template
<Describe the change in a few sentences and explain its value to the project.>
## Changes
- <Describe a specific change and its effect.>
- <Describe another change, including relevant documentation or tests.>
## Documentation examples
- [<Live functionality example>](<verified RTD preview URL and anchor>)
— <What reviewers can try or inspect here.>
## Screenshots
<Describe the visual change shown in this preview-build screenshot.>

## Validation
- `<command or check>` — <result>
- Read the Docs preview — <build result and what was verified>Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

