model-workflows
Skill1.5k starsChanged 10 days agoBSD-3-ClauseView on GitHub
Use when choosing a DeepOps model workflow, combining shared model caching with single-node serving, or determining whether a fine-tuning or multi-node request has a supported procedure.
Trending
Quiet since June.about the whole repository
Who's talking about NVIDIA/deepops
- kubeflow/kubeflow“Add support to display different GPU types, specifically NVIDIA Multi-Instance GPUs”GitHub · Oct 8, 2020 · 6 reactions
- kubeflow/website“Really need a Kubeflow Ecosystem Section to the Website, (Note list is attached I found who are in the …”GitHub · Jun 28, 2020 · 4 reactions
- PyTorchKR/landscape“[Add] NVIDIA DeepOps (NVIDIA/deepops)”GitHub · Jun 6, 2026
- glotzerlab/hoomd-blue“Allow dynamic loading of slurm_conf on Anvil.”GitHub · Jul 19, 2024
- hashicorp/vagrant“Error with provider libvirt”GitHub · Mar 24, 2024
The biggest 5 of 24 mentions linking to the repository that our crawl found. Each line is their own headline.
See all 24
Talked about on GitHub (24 times).
On GitHub · 24
- Oct 8, 2020Add support to display different GPU types, specifically NVIDIA Multi-Instance GPUs — kubeflow/kubeflow6 reactions · 13 comments
- Jun 28, 2020Really need a Kubeflow Ecosystem Section to the Website, (Note list is attached I found who are in the Ecosystem) — kubeflow/website4 reactions · 11 comments
- Jun 6, 2026[Add] NVIDIA DeepOps (NVIDIA/deepops) — PyTorchKR/landscape0 reactions
- Jul 19, 2024Allow dynamic loading of slurm_conf on Anvil. — glotzerlab/hoomd-blue0 reactions
- Mar 24, 2024Error with provider libvirt — hashicorp/vagrant0 reactions · 1 comment
19 more on GitHub
- Aug 13, 2023Set HPA(Horizontal Pod Autoscaler) of Triton Inference Server with Prometheus metric — MrSyee/SAM-remove-background0 reactions
- Apr 4, 2023Configuration issues with containerd failing Kubespray install with "unknown service runtime.v1alpha2.ImageService" error — kubernetes-sigs/kubespray0 reactions · 6 comments
- Nov 10, 2022Prometheus metric gpu_capacity is not found. — NTHU-LSALAB/KubeShare0 reactions · 4 comments
- Feb 26, 2022SLURM gpus-per-task issue — NVIDIA/pyxis0 reactions · 5 comments
- Sep 5, 2021feature(GPU): kubespray install NVIDIA GPU — k8sli/kubeplay0 reactions · 1 comment
- Aug 12, 2021Ensure systemd unit reloaded when restarting — NVIDIA/ansible-role-nvidia-docker0 reactions
- May 18, 2021Super huge log messages from journald - misconfigured filter_concat? — kokuwaio/helm-charts0 reactions · 2 comments
- Mar 22, 2021Add var to allow skipping reload of Docker daemon — NVIDIA/ansible-role-nvidia-docker0 reactions
- Dec 18, 2020Multiple Pods stucks in CrashLoopBackOff — kubeflow/kubeflow0 reactions · 9 comments
- Oct 19, 2020Update PPA URL — DeepOps/ansible-maas0 reactions
- Oct 7, 2020enroot-nsenter: failed to create user namespace: Invalid argument — NVIDIA/enroot0 reactions · 2 comments
- Aug 20, 2020Istio Dex Manifest v1.0.2 is "Unable to fetch Nodes", centraldashboard throwing 504 — kubeflow/community-distribution0 reactions · 2 comments
- Jul 16, 2020Multi-GPU workloads hang in Jupyter Notebooks launched through Kubeflow — kubeflow/kubeflow0 reactions · 3 comments
- Jun 16, 2020update_ood_portal may not work on Ubuntu — OSC/ood-ansible0 reactions · 1 comment
- May 18, 2020details = "failed to connect to all addresses" in "helm" module — ansible/ansible0 reactions · 8 comments
- Jan 22, 2020Failed to fetch https://s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/coreos-charts/stable/index.yaml : 403 Forbidden — prometheus-operator/kube-prometheus0 reactions · 4 comments
- Sep 14, 2019ambassador always CrashLoopBackOff — kubeflow/kubeflow0 reactions · 8 comments
- Aug 9, 2019"Copy kubectl binary to ansible host" sometimes fails with memory error due to known issue with 'fetch' module. — kubernetes-sigs/kubespray0 reactions · 8 comments
- Nov 13, 2018Tiller init command failing on primary master — kubernetes-sigs/kubespray0 reactions
In this repository11 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- deploy-airgappedSkill
- deploy-k8s-gpu-clusterSkill
- deploy-runai-kaiSkill
- deploy-slurm-clusterSkill
- diagnose-driver-installSkill
- finetune-modelSkill
- manage-model-cacheSkill
- provision-with-maasSkill
- serve-modelSkill
- validate-gpu-clusterSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
3 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈2
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 26
Do not accept a directory or config.json alone as complete model coverage.
- Distinctive: line 34
Follow the selected skill's failure branches.
- Distinctive: line 52
No multi-node hooks or implicit fallback to a different workflow are provided.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Choose a model workflow
This is the umbrella entry point, not a launcher. Start from the repository root. Identify the requested outcome before running anything: cached inputs, working inference, or training are different outcomes with different evidence.
Select the supported path
| Requested outcome | Procedure | Evidence |
| Prepare or repair shared model inputs | Manage model cache | Cache validator exit 0 and ok: true, as the real consumer. Only named-file readability is proven. |
| Serve a pinned snapshot on one GPU | Serve model | Cache gate first, then serving validator exit 0 and ok: true. One bounded completion, not training or performance validation. |
| Check fine-tuning prerequisites | Fine-tuning readiness | Readiness validator exit 0, status: ready, training_validated: false. Optional one-GPU container probe is off by default. |
| Actually fine-tune a model | Stop: no supported training recipe or training-result validator is provided here yet. | Readiness is not training success. Obtain a reviewed recipe and explicit success criteria before proceeding. |
| Multi-node serving or training | Stop: unsupported by these skills. | Do not infer distributed support from a successful single-node check. |
Common preflight
- Confirm the operator's goal, model license, repository ID, immutable full
revision, complete required-file list, cache path and real reader UID/group.
Do not accept a directory or
config.jsonalone as complete model coverage. - Confirm the target and authorization for each action. Cache preparation, downloads, package installation, GPU allocation, service startup and inference requests are separate actions. A skill or validator grants none of them.
- Reuse the existing cache interface: share only
HF_HUB_CACHE, use a designated writer and pass the local snapshot path to consumers. Mount the whole cache read-only; keep authentication and framework caches private. Never put training outputs or checkpoints in the shared input cache. - Follow the selected skill's failure branches. Stop on absent authorization, incomplete files, space pressure, unknown endpoint ownership or required site authentication. Never remove controls, change infrastructure or delete other users' files to turn a failure into a pass.
Report only the evidence obtained
Record which validator ran, its exit code, schema version, explicit inputs and checks. The cache guide and serving guide define their JSON contracts; the fine-tuning readiness guide separates preparation from training. This umbrella does not invent a combined success field.
A readable cache is preparation only. A completion is inference only. Neither proves that a particular revision was loaded, a GPU was used, or training succeeded. A checkpoint filename by itself is not training validation. Keep startup logs private; do not include credentials or sensitive prompts in reports. No multi-node hooks or implicit fallback to a different workflow are provided.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

