agentleFS
NVIDIAKnown publisherNVIDIA/deepops/skills/model-workflows/SKILL.md

model-workflows

Skill1.5k starsChanged 10 days agoBSD-3-ClauseView on GitHub

Use when choosing a DeepOps model workflow, combining shared model caching with single-node serving, or determining whether a fine-tuning or multi-node request has a supported procedure.

Trending

Quiet since June.about the whole repository

Dec 2025: 0 mentionsJan 2026: 0 mentionsFeb 2026: 0 mentionsMar 2026: 0 mentionsApr 2026: 0 mentionsMay 2026: 0 mentionsJun 2026: 1 mentionJul 2026: 0 mentionsAug 2026: 0 mentionsSep 2026: 0 mentionsOct 2026: 0 mentionsNov 2026: 0 mentions
Dec 2025Jun 2026Nov 2026
Mentions a month of the NVIDIA/deepops repository that our weekly crawl found. There is no adoption data for this file yet.

Who's talking about NVIDIA/deepops

The biggest 5 of 24 mentions linking to the repository that our crawl found. Each line is their own headline.

See all 24

Talked about on GitHub (24 times).

On GitHub · 24

19 more on GitHub

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

3 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈2

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Do not accept a directory or config.json alone as complete model coverage.

    line 26
  2. Distinctive:

    Follow the selected skill's failure branches.

    line 34
  3. Distinctive:

    No multi-node hooks or implicit fallback to a different workflow are provided.

    line 52

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Choose a model workflow

This is the umbrella entry point, not a launcher. Start from the repository root. Identify the requested outcome before running anything: cached inputs, working inference, or training are different outcomes with different evidence.

Select the supported path

Requested outcomeProcedureEvidence
Prepare or repair shared model inputsManage model cacheCache validator exit 0 and ok: true, as the real consumer. Only named-file readability is proven.
Serve a pinned snapshot on one GPUServe modelCache gate first, then serving validator exit 0 and ok: true. One bounded completion, not training or performance validation.
Check fine-tuning prerequisitesFine-tuning readinessReadiness validator exit 0, status: ready, training_validated: false. Optional one-GPU container probe is off by default.
Actually fine-tune a modelStop: no supported training recipe or training-result validator is provided here yet.Readiness is not training success. Obtain a reviewed recipe and explicit success criteria before proceeding.
Multi-node serving or trainingStop: unsupported by these skills.Do not infer distributed support from a successful single-node check.

Common preflight

  1. Confirm the operator's goal, model license, repository ID, immutable full revision, complete required-file list, cache path and real reader UID/group. Do not accept a directory or config.json alone as complete model coverage.
  2. Confirm the target and authorization for each action. Cache preparation, downloads, package installation, GPU allocation, service startup and inference requests are separate actions. A skill or validator grants none of them.
  3. Reuse the existing cache interface: share only HF_HUB_CACHE, use a designated writer and pass the local snapshot path to consumers. Mount the whole cache read-only; keep authentication and framework caches private. Never put training outputs or checkpoints in the shared input cache.
  4. Follow the selected skill's failure branches. Stop on absent authorization, incomplete files, space pressure, unknown endpoint ownership or required site authentication. Never remove controls, change infrastructure or delete other users' files to turn a failure into a pass.

Report only the evidence obtained

Record which validator ran, its exit code, schema version, explicit inputs and checks. The cache guide and serving guide define their JSON contracts; the fine-tuning readiness guide separates preparation from training. This umbrella does not invent a combined success field.

A readable cache is preparation only. A completion is inference only. Neither proves that a particular revision was loaded, a GPU was used, or training succeeded. A checkpoint filename by itself is not training validation. Keep startup logs private; do not include credentials or sensitive prompts in reports. No multi-node hooks or implicit fallback to a different workflow are provided.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.