agentleFS
NVIDIAKnown publisherNVIDIA/auto-ontology/skills/nvidia-ontology-management/SKILL.md

nvidia-ontology-management

Skill9.9k starsChanged 45 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

Model and publish semantic definitions in Auto Ontology. Use for terms, relationships, measures, imports, and governed results—not deployment or querying.

1 other project uses a version of this.

Trending

More talk lately.about the whole repository

Dec 2025: 0 mentionsJan 2026: 0 mentionsFeb 2026: 0 mentionsMar 2026: 0 mentionsApr 2026: 0 mentionsMay 2026: 0 mentionsJun 2026: 0 mentionsJul 2026: 0 mentionsAug 2026: 0 mentionsSep 2026: 0 mentionsOct 2026: 0 mentionsNov 2026: 64 mentions
Dec 2025Jun 2026Nov 2026
Mentions a month of the NVIDIA/auto-ontology repository that our weekly crawl found. There is no adoption data for this file yet.

Most recently taken up by

Who's talking about NVIDIA/auto-ontology

The biggest 5 of 64 mentions linking to the repository that our crawl found. Each line is their own headline.

See all 64

Talked about on GitHub, YouTube, Bluesky and Hacker News (64 times).

On GitHub · 27

22 more on GitHub

On YouTube · 24

19 more on YouTube

On Bluesky · 12

7 more on Bluesky

On Hacker News · 1

  • Other versions1 project uses a version of this.

    Word for word · 1

    1. NVIDIA/skills★ 3.9k100% same

    Edited · 0

    None found.

    Wrote their own version · 0

    None found.

    How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.

  • In this repository7 other files it gives its agents.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

4 rules. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈1

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 3

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Use a running, authenticated Auto Ontology deployment.

    line 50
  2. Distinctive:

    Resolve the semantic contract: when meaning changes. Record source binding, identity, population, relationship cardinality, measure …

    line 75
  3. Very specific:

    Validate SQL: before create/update: POST /api/sql-attributes/validate.

    line 81
  4. Very specific:

    Compilation is not a hidden side effect: Check GET /api/semantic-compilation/status.

    line 85

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md
<!-- SPDX-FileCopyrightText: Copyright (c) 2026, NVIDIA CORPORATION & AFFILIATES. All rights reserved. SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 -->

Auto Ontology management and modeling

Purpose

Inspect and change Auto Ontology's semantic layer without confusing a successful API call with correct business meaning or durable publication. The machine-readable inputs, outputs, statuses, gates, and handoffs are in runtime-contract.yaml.

Choose the focused workflow before acting:

  • routine inspection or metadata edits: continue below and use write-api.md;
  • concepts, relationships, measures, units, grain, or policies: use modeling.md;
  • model promotion or reusable analytical results: use publication.md.

MCP tools only read. Create, patch, import, and compile-reset go through the Next.js /api/... gateway. Governed result rows require an approved source writer; Auto Ontology has no generic result-row writeback endpoint. Request bodies and field types live in docs/openapi/auto-ontology-api.json; this skill names operations and permissions only.

Prerequisites

Use a running, authenticated Auto Ontology deployment. Use nvidia-ontology-setup when the deployment or semantic layer is not ready.

Limitations

MCP is read-only, Auto Ontology has no generic result-row writeback endpoint, and current model import and certification APIs do not prove atomic promotion. Follow the publication gates below and fail closed when exact readback is unavailable.

Auth

Scripts use an API token (x-api-key or Authorization: Bearer). Mint it in the UI (user menu → API Tokens). A token acts as its owner — a viewer's token cannot do admin things. Creating and revoking tokens requires a signed-in session; a token cannot mint another token.

Writes below need catalog:edit unless noted. 403 means the owner's role lacks that permission, not that the path is wrong.

Instructions

  1. Discover current meaning via MCP (search_terms, get_term, get_term_columns, get_term_sql_attributes, describe_table) or REST if MCP is absent (GET /api/terms, GET /api/terms/{term_id}, GET /api/exploration/tables/{table_id}/details).
  2. Resolve the semantic contract when meaning changes. Record source binding, identity, population, relationship cardinality, measure expression, unit, grain, denominator, time, validity, and counterexamples; see modeling.md.
  3. State the proposed change to the user (term rename, new SQL attribute, import, and so on). Do not silently rewrite the glossary.
  4. Validate SQL before create/update: POST /api/sql-attributes/validate. A parse failure is HTTP 422, not valid: false.
  5. Apply the smallest write that matches the request (see write-api.md).
  6. Compilation is not a hidden side effect. Check GET /api/semantic-compilation/status. Do not call POST /api/semantic-compilation/reset as cleanup — it is an asynchronous, destructive rebuild of every database's compiled layer, returns 202, and requires semanticCompilation:manage.
  7. Verify the persisted change, not merely request success. Model imports require a scoped backup and exact re-export comparison; see publication.md. Then use MCP check_answerable / ask_question (or REST POST /api/question-entity-coverage and POST /api/chat/completions) for positive and negative behavior checks.

Semantic relationships and "what does this dataset mean"

Stay on the semantic layer. Do not browse raw schemas to answer meaning.

  • Term → columns: MCP get_term_columns or GET /api/terms/{term_id}/column-attributes
  • Term → derived SQL: MCP get_term_sql_attributes
  • Table → terms and SQL attributes: MCP describe_table or GET /api/exploration/tables/{table_id}/details
  • Semantic hop chain between two terms: GET /api/exploration/terms/{term_id}/path/{other_term_id}
  • Semantic graphs: GET /api/exploration/graph, GET /api/exploration/semantic-graph

These are semantic relationship paths, not generation provenance, source revision, certification history, or version lineage.

Bulk import / export

  • POST /api/model/export — YAML of catalog + semantic layer. Permission modelInterchange:export. Body may set catalog database IDs in databases (empty = all) and format (auto_ontology or ossie).
  • POST /api/model/import — multipart YAML; native Auto Ontology (data_layer / semantic_layer) or Apache Ossie (version, name, datasets at the root). Query replace (default true) and embed (default true). Permission modelInterchange:import. Can replace existing data — confirm with the user before replace=true, apply first in isolation, and use the exact readback workflow in publication.md.

Examples

  • To define a run-grain measure, follow the evidence and counterexample workflow in modeling.md.
  • To revise and promote a model, back up the exact scope and follow the staged readback workflow in publication.md.

Troubleshooting

For write failures, verify the authenticated owner's permission, distinguish HTTP 422 parse failures from validation results, and inspect compilation status before changing the model or resetting compilation.

See also

  • write-api.md
  • modeling.md
  • publication.md
  • nvidia-ontology-query — how to call Auto Ontology and validate query results
  • nvidia-ontology-setup — deployment not ready
  • mcp/auto_ontology_mcp/tools.py — live read-tool allow-list

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.