profile-model
Skill290 starsChanged 45 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Measure one TensorRT-Model-Connect model through its public Task API or run a checked-in performance-matrix entry with comparable evidence.
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- modular/skillstheir own version, first seen Jul 30, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 1
- modular/skills★ 207same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository13 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- website/static/llms.txtllms.txt
- debug-trt-mismatchSkill
- doc-syncSkill
- fp16-trt-networkSkill
- optimize-model-precisionSkill
- pr-babysitterSkill
- review-trtmc-prSkill
- setup-trtmc-environmentSkill
- submit-github-bug-issueSkill
- submit-github-prSkill
- transform-modelSkill
- write-git-messagesSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
2 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈2
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 22
Run the owning family correctness testcase on the exact bundle.
- Distinctive: line 35
Use the same bundle kind, hardware, input, seed, warmups, iterations, and runtime policy for before/after comparisons.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Profile a Model
Choose the evidence level before running:
- For one model or testcase, use
trtmc-bench. - For a release comparison against the native model, use
trtmc-aiperf-qual(apps/aiperf_qual).
The public benchmark boundary is public_task_call_wall. It excludes bundle
building, process startup, warmup, report generation, and bundle loading.
Current public tooling does not provide layer attribution; do not infer a
kernel or layer bottleneck from Task API wall time alone.
Before timing
Run the owning family correctness testcase on the exact bundle. Record the repository and checkpoint revisions, GPU and driver, runtime root, family DSO, operation, input, seed, warmups, iterations, and synchronization boundary.
For a focused run:
trtmc-bench run --model <model> --case <case> \
--bundle <bundle> --no-build \
--warmup 3 --iterations 10 --runtime-root <runtime-root> \
--output <result-dir>Use the same bundle kind, hardware, input, seed, warmups, iterations, and runtime policy for before/after comparisons. If any differ, report the confounder instead of one causal speedup percentage.
For release evidence, run the exact profile with
trtmc-aiperf-qual run --profile <profile> --environment <environment> --out <result-dir>
(see apps/aiperf_qual/README.md).
Lead the report with correctness and evidence level. Include exact commands, p50 and other suite-owned statistics, measurement scope, limitations, and any target not run.
HTTP text load evidence
For text serving measurements, reuse the persistent trtmc-server through
python3 -m trtmc_aiperf_qual text-profile --environment <environment> --config
<text-config> --out <result-dir> with PYTHONPATH=apps/aiperf_qual. Consult
website/docs/user-guides/profile-text-with-aiperf.md and the checked-in
apps/aiperf_qual/config/text/ examples. Keep the owning family's exact-bundle
correctness checks before timing; HTTP success does not replace them.
Require incremental capability before interpreting TTFT or inter-token
latency. Nonstreaming native records use public_task_call_wall; streaming
records include relay/backpressure and have a different scope. Preserve warmup
and failures when joining AIPerf exports to server records with X-Request-ID.
Native prompt counts are unavailable; client tokenizer counts are estimates.
AIPerf request latency ends at the last content response. Inspect the client
request lifecycle and server handler timing as well: terminal delivery or
cleanup can delay the next request without appearing in content latency.
The optional sequential reference comparison requires matching payloads,
outputs, token counts, precision and Task boundaries. It does not change the
qualification criteria or establish speedup from HTTP latency alone.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

