agentleFS
NVIDIA-NeMoNVIDIA-NeMo/Megatron-Bridge/skills/nemo-mbridge-perf-moe-dispatcher-selection/SKILL.md

nemo-mbridge-perf-moe-dispatcher-selection

Skill976 starsChanged 22 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

Select and validate an MoE token dispatcher (`alltoall`, DeepEP, or HybridEP) for a fixed workload and runtime. Covers backend availability, topology, matched A/B evidence, routing semantics, and failure diagnosis. Use when choosing a dispatcher or tracing a regression or crash to the MoE dispatcher configuration.

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

5 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈3

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Do not interpret a dispatcher timing until the container has proven that the selected backend package is available.

    line 58
  2. Very specific:

    Both dispatchers need SM tuning: default moe_deepep_num_sms (20) and moe_hybridep_num_sms (16) are reasonable starting points but rarely …

    line 212
  3. Distinctive:

    Force-balance and dropless are not interchangeable baselines: keep the routing mode fixed when comparing dispatcher backends.

    line 215
  4. Very specific:

    Backend import failures are not performance data: if DeepEP or HybridEP is missing from the container, do not compare its failed job …

    line 222
  5. Distinctive:

    Forced routing is not training equivalence: use it only as a disclosed benchmark control, then validate natural routing separately.

    line 227

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 308,232 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

MoE Dispatcher Selection Guide

Stable docs: @docs/training/moe-optimization.md Card: @skills/nemo-mbridge-perf-moe-dispatcher-selection/card.yaml

Quick Decision

By hardware

HardwareBring-up pathTuned candidates
H100alltoallA/B DeepEP and HybridEP when installed; the current 16×H100 Qwen3 30B winner is HybridEP
B200alltoallA/B DeepEP and HybridEP when supported by the target runtime
GB200 / GB300 NVL72alltoallHybridEP is the strongest topology-informed candidate; compare DeepEP when available
UnknownalltoallAdd one flex backend only after the correctness baseline is stable

Hardware narrows the candidate set; it does not select the winner. Hold the model, routing, batch shape, parallelism, overlap, graph scope, container, and timing window fixed during the comparison.

By EP degree

EP sizeGuidance
Small EPDispatcher choice may be second-order; start with alltoall
Medium EPProfile first, then A/B the installed flex backends
Large EPPrioritize topology-aware candidates, but still require a matched A/B

On one NVL8 domain in BF16, treat alltoall and HybridEP as matched candidates: their throughput can be close once the full stack is held fixed. HybridEP is a high-priority tuning path, not a reason to skip the correctness baseline.

Model-Family Patterns

WorkloadCommon best pathNotes
DSV3 at large scaleMeasured snapshots use HybridEP on GB200/GB300 and DeepEP on H100Revalidate against the target container and topology
Qwen3 235BCurrent H100 recipe uses alltoall plus overlap; measured GB200 snapshots use HybridEPDo not replace the current recipe from a hardware rule alone
Qwen3 30BCurrent canonical 16×H100 recipe uses HybridEPDirect counterexample to H100 → DeepEP mapping
Qwen3-NextWorkload-dependentPrecision, memory, PP layout, and kernels can change the ordering
MoE VLMsStart simple, then test HybridEP on GB200-class systemsVision workloads are sensitive to both memory and host overhead

Rounded Evidence Summary

Backend availability gate

Do not interpret a dispatcher timing until the container has proven that the selected backend package is available. --moe_flex_dispatcher_backend None selects the standard alltoall dispatcher, while deepep and hybridep select moe_token_dispatcher_type="flex" and then require their corresponding runtime packages at model construction time. If DeepEP or HybridEP is missing, record the import failure as an environment limitation and treat alltoall as the only measured correctness fallback for that run.

Qwen3 30B A3B on H100

The current canonical 16×H100 BF16 performance recipe uses HybridEP, 32 HybridEP SMs, 64-token combine chunks, plain expert-parallel communication overlap, delayed weight-gradient compute disabled, and TE graphs over moe_router and moe_preprocess. Its verified 50-step run averaged 20.14729 s and 299.352 model TFLOPS/GPU over steps 41–50. This proves HybridEP can win on NVL8 H100; it does not prove HybridEP is universal.

An earlier matched overlap A/B on the same broad shape isolated a rise from 244.039 to 287.305 TFLOPS/GPU. Keep that causal result separate from the later multi-knob canonical winner.

A short 2026-05-17 H100 smoke run used Qwen3 30B A3B BF16, 16 GPUs, EP=16, the recipe's Transformer Engine CUDA graph scopes (moe_router, moe_preprocess), and model.moe_permute_fusion=false due to a Triton JIT compatibility issue in the run container. The alltoall fallback completed five steps with 45.65 s mean step time after warmup, 132.9 mean TFLOP/s/GPU after warmup, final loss 11.44050, and 61.351 GB peak max allocated memory. DeepEP and HybridEP selected the requested flex backend in the dumped configs but failed before the first iteration because the packages were not installed. This confirms the availability gate; it is not a throughput ranking for flex dispatchers on H100.

DSV3 on GB200 or GB300

The broad trend is more important than any single row in the tracker:

  • plain alltoall is usually the conservative baseline
  • DeepEP improves that baseline once EP communication becomes visible
  • HybridEP adds another step up on NVL72 systems, especially after CUDA graphs, routing improvements, and CPU-side cleanup are already in place

In practice, the stack often moves from roughly "low-teens MFU" territory with an untuned baseline into "high-teens to low-20s MFU" territory after the full dispatcher and kernel stack is tuned.

Qwen3 235B on GB200

For Qwen3 235B, the practical ordering is usually:

  1. alltoall for initial bring-up
  2. DeepEP if you want a familiar tuned path
  3. HybridEP for the strongest steady-state result on GB200

HybridEP is usually modestly faster than alltoall on this workload and often has noticeably better memory headroom.

Qwen3-Next on GB200

This family is a good reminder that dispatcher wins are workload-dependent:

  • in BF16, alltoall and HybridEP can be close
  • in FP8 or memory-constrained settings, HybridEP tends to look better
  • pipeline layout and grouped-GEMM changes can matter almost as much as the dispatcher itself

Tuning Parameters

DeepEP

DeepEP is selected by setting moe_token_dispatcher_type="flex" and moe_flex_dispatcher_backend="deepep".

--moe-deepep-num-sms 20

Tune the SM count allocated to DeepEP communication kernels (default 20). The optimal value depends on the workload and EP degree. First confirm the DeepEP package imports in the target container; a missing package fails during model construction, before any dispatcher timing is available.

HybridEP

HybridEP is selected by setting moe_token_dispatcher_type="flex" and moe_flex_dispatcher_backend="hybridep".

--moe-hybridep-num-sms 16

Tune the SM count allocated to HybridEP communication (default 16). The performance harness uses 32 for HybridEP workloads. Sweep between 16 and 32 for the target hardware. Set NUM_OF_HYBRID_EP_RANKS_PER_NVLINK_DOMAIN to match the NVLink domain size of the deployment. If it does not match the actual topology, performance and sometimes correctness will suffer. First confirm the HybridEP package imports in the target container; a missing package fails during model construction, before any dispatcher timing is available.

Routing mode

--moe-router-force-load-balancing

Forced load balancing is a benchmark-only control that can reduce routing variance across dispatcher backends. It changes routing semantics, so keep it fixed within the dispatcher A/B and do not use it to accept a training-equivalent or convergence-sensitive result. Validate the production winner again with natural routing.

Key Interactions

FeatureInteraction
CUDA graphsProfile-driven candidate; start narrow and re-test after dispatcher changes
EP overlapHelps when dispatcher time is still visible after backend tuning
FP8Often increases the relative importance of communication and host overhead
CPU affinityCan matter as much as dispatcher choice on GB200 or GB300
Pipeline layoutPoor PP or VPP layout can erase dispatcher gains

When To Use Each

alltoall

  • first correctness bring-up
  • small EP configurations
  • debugging communication regressions

DeepEP

  • any supported target runtime where DeepEP imports successfully
  • cross-node EP is clearly visible in profiles
  • a matched steady-state A/B beats the alternatives

HybridEP

  • NVL72 systems, where the topology makes it a high-priority candidate
  • NVL8 systems when the package supports the topology and a matched A/B wins
  • large EP degrees
  • memory headroom matters in addition to throughput
  • an NVL8 BF16 matched A/B beats or materially improves headroom over alltoall; a small or negative delta is a valid reason to keep alltoall

Pitfalls

  1. Do not compare dispatchers on different stacks: container, routing mode, PP layout, and CUDA-graph scope can move the result as much as the dispatcher.
  2. HybridEP is topology-sensitive: configure the actual NVLink domain and do not infer support or performance from the GPU SKU alone.
  3. Both dispatchers need SM tuning: default moe_deepep_num_sms (20) and moe_hybridep_num_sms (16) are reasonable starting points but rarely optimal.
  4. Force-balance and dropless are not interchangeable baselines: keep the routing mode fixed when comparing dispatcher backends.
  5. Memory and throughput can trade off differently by model: Qwen3-style runs may show a smaller speed delta than DSV3, but still justify HybridEP for memory headroom.
  6. Backend import failures are not performance data: if DeepEP or HybridEP is missing from the container, do not compare its failed job against a completed alltoall job. Fix the environment first, then rerun the same stack.
  7. Forced routing is not training equivalence: use it only as a disclosed benchmark control, then validate natural routing separately.
  8. Config selection is not backend proof: require runtime evidence that the requested flex backend initialized and completed steady iterations.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

Reviews can't be read right now.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.