nemo-automodel-model-onboarding
Skill1k starsChanged 20 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Guide for onboarding new model architectures into NeMo AutoModel, including architecture discovery, implementation patterns, registration, and validation. Use when adding or modifying model architecture support in NeMo AutoModel, such as LLM/VLM/MoE model files, custom layers, state-dict adapters, registry entries, Hugging Face config mapping, or capability flags.
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
36 rules. About 0 are common, 25 are distinctive, and 11 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈25
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
11
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 21
When answering an onboarding question, keep the response in this order:
- Distinctive: line 32
Use direct action verbs: classify the model, name the files, map the weights, register the class, and add tests.
- Distinctive: line 39
Use these compact answer patterns for common questions:
- Distinctive: line 59
Do not treat VLM onboarding as a pure causal-LM path or skip processor/image tests.
- Distinctive: line 66
Use this skill only when the user is adding or modifying model architecture support: model files, custom layers, state-dict adapters, …
- Distinctive: line 68
Do not use this skill for standalone training recipe YAML questions about optimizers, datasets, schedulers, validation datasets, or trainer …
- Distinctive: line 84
Before writing code, gather information about the target model.
- Very specific: line 107
Look in components/models/ for architectures with similar attention or MLP patterns:
- Distinctive: line 124
Check whether the model needs:
- Very specific: line 192
Every registered model class with a causal lm_head must:
- Very specific: line 196
Call reject_unsupported_tie_word_embeddings(type(self), config) at the top of __init__, using the original config before unwrapping …
- Distinctive: line 200
Only classes with no causal LM head may be explicitly exempted from the registry test.
- Distinctive: line 225
Do not tie architectures with intentionally separate heads, asymmetric vocab sizes, or stages that do not own both tensors.
- Distinctive: line 244
Add tests that assert expected key mappings and run numerical equivalence with tiny configs before trying full checkpoints.
- Distinctive: line 249
Do not use these shortcuts:
- Very specific: line 251
Do not validate the adapter only by calling from_pretrained().
- Distinctive: line 252
Do not accept missing or extra expert keys without an explicit mapping reason.
- Distinctive: line 253
Do not change dtype, transpose dimensions, or reshape tensors unless the HF and NeMo layouts require it and a test proves the conversion is …
- Distinctive: line 255
Do not skip router or shared-expert tests because dense-layer tests pass.
- Distinctive: line 274
Treat checkpoint performance as an implementation requirement, not a later optimization.
- Distinctive: line 279
Avoid full-checkpoint or model-sized temporary copies when tensors can load directly into final model storage or be transformed in bounded …
- Distinctive: line 281
Keep distributed reads and conversions rank-local when a rank needs only its shard.
- Distinctive: line 283
Avoid repeated tensor merges, copies, full-heap garbage collections, shard scans, or file opens inside model-sized loops.
- Very specific: line 288
Every adapter must evaluate supports_low_memory_dcp_load.
- Very specific: line 305
Add the model to MODEL_ARCH_MAPPING in _transformers/registry.py:
- Very specific: line 318
If the model has a custom config class with auto_map in its config.json, also register in _CUSTOM_CONFIG_REGISTRATIONS:
- Very specific: line 329
Every class registered in MODEL_ARCH_MAPPING must declare parallelism capabilities, either with a static nested ModelCapabilities dataclass …
- Very specific: line 334
If the model has precision-sensitive parameters such as Mamba A_log / dt_bias, MoE sigmoid gate bias, attention-sink bias, or per-head …
- Very specific: line 350
Create an example config under examples/llm_finetune/<name>/ (or examples/vlm_finetune/<name>/):
- Distinctive: line 372
Test that the model loads from a HuggingFace checkpoint:
- Distinctive: line 382
Before using full-size models, verify with a tiny config (1-2 layers, small hidden dim) to catch shape mismatches early.
- Very specific: line 386
Create tests/unit_tests/models/<name>/ and cover the checks below before loading full checkpoints:
- Distinctive: line 409
Add a row with the model name, supported features (TP, PP, FSDP, LoRA, QLoRA), and any limitations.
- Distinctive: line 415
After implementation and unit tests are complete, run the full parity-testing workflow to verify that the new model produces numerically …
- Distinctive: line 419
Run three levels of comparison:
- Distinctive: line 431
Do not skip this phase. A model that passes unit tests can still diverge from HF due to subtle weight-conversion bugs, backend differences, …
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 308,232 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Adding Model Support to NeMo AutoModel
Purpose
This skill guides implementation of new model architectures in NeMo AutoModel. Follow the five phases in order.
<!-- NVSkills signature refresh requested after PR #2998 (2026-07-31). -->Instructions
When answering an onboarding question, keep the response in this order:
- Classify the architecture from
config.json. - Name the exact implementation files under
components/models/<name>/. - Identify registry and optional custom-config updates.
- State the validation tests that must be added before full checkpoint use.
For conceptual onboarding questions, answer from this skill without opening the pattern files unless the user asks you to edit code. Mention pattern filenames as references, then give the direct checklist.
Use direct action verbs: classify the model, name the files, map the weights, register the class, and add tests. Do not discuss distributed strategy, launcher configuration, or general recipe authoring unless the user explicitly connects it to onboarding a new architecture.
Examples
Use these compact answer patterns for common questions:
- Dense causal LM: classify as dense only when
architecturescontains aForCausalLMclass and expert fields such asnum_local_experts,n_routed_experts, ornum_experts_per_tokare absent. Createcomponents/models/<name>/model.pyand__init__.py; addstate_dict_adapter.pyonly for checkpoint weight conversion andconfig.pyonly if needed. RegisterMODEL_ARCH_MAPPINGin_transformers/registry.py, add example YAML, and add tiny-config unit tests plus layer-equivalence tests for rewritten layers. - MoE state dict: identify expert fields in
config.json, referencemoe-patterns.md, map router tensors separately, preserve routed-expert index order, map routed experts, shared experts, and gate/up/down projections, add adapter key-map tests and tiny-config numerical equivalence tests, and do not rely only onfrom_pretrained()or silent tensor reshapes. - VLM onboarding: classify as VLM only when
vision_config,text_config, and aForConditionalGenerationarchitecture are present. Referencevlm-patterns.mdand existing VLM implementations such asmistral4,kimivl, orkimi_k25_vl; check text backbone, vision tower, projector, processor assumptions, text and vision checkpoint compatibility (adapter mappings when needed), registry registration, and tiny image-text tests before full checkpoints. Do not treat VLM onboarding as a pure causal-LM path or skip processor/image tests.
For MoE state-dict and VLM questions, apply the checklists in Sections 2.4 and 2.5.
Routing Boundary
Use this skill only when the user is adding or modifying model architecture support: model files, custom layers, state-dict adapters, Hugging Face config mapping, registry entries, or model capability flags.
Do not use this skill for standalone training recipe YAML questions about optimizers, datasets, schedulers, validation datasets, or trainer wiring unless they are explicitly part of onboarding a new model architecture. Those recipe questions belong to the nemo-automodel-recipe-development skill.
In-scope examples:
- "Add support for a new Hugging Face causal LM architecture."
- "Map MoE router and expert weights from a Hugging Face checkpoint."
- "Register a new model class in NeMo AutoModel."
Out-of-scope examples:
- "Write a finetuning recipe YAML with optimizer and dataset sections."
- "Choose FSDP2, DDP, tensor parallel, or context parallel settings."
- "Configure Slurm, SkyPilot, containers, mounts, or launch dispatch."
Phase 1: Discovery
Before writing code, gather information about the target model.
1.1 Fetch HuggingFace config.json
Download the model's config.json from the HuggingFace Hub (or use AutoConfig.from_pretrained). Key fields to extract:
architectures-- determines the class name and registration key (e.g.,"LlamaForCausalLM","Qwen3MoeForCausalLM","Mistral3ForConditionalGeneration")model_type-- used for custom config registration in_CUSTOM_CONFIG_REGISTRATIONSif HF does not have a built-in config classhidden_size,intermediate_size,num_hidden_layers,num_attention_heads,num_key_value_heads-- sizingvocab_size-- needed for tiny test configstie_word_embeddings-- the saved setting in each supported checkpoint; do not infer it from a bare config constructorhidden_act-- activation function (e.g.,"silu"for SwiGLU)
1.2 Determine model type
| Type | Indicators | Pattern file |
| Dense LLM | ForCausalLM in architectures, no expert fields | llm-patterns.md |
| MoE LLM | n_routed_experts, num_local_experts, num_experts_per_tok in config | moe-patterns.md |
| VLM | ForConditionalGeneration in architectures, has vision_config + text_config | vlm-patterns.md |
1.3 Check for existing similar architectures
Look in components/models/ for architectures with similar attention or MLP patterns:
components/models/
llama/ # Standard GQA + SwiGLU with separate HF-compatible projections
qwen2/ # Same as Llama but with attention bias + QKV bias
baichuan/ # ALiBi attention variant
deepseek_v3/ # MLA attention + MoE (DeepSeek-style grouped experts)
mistral4/ # MLA + MoE + VLM (Pixtral vision)
kimivl/ # DeepSeek-V3 backbone + MoonVit vision
kimi_k25_vl/ # Updated KimiVL with different projector
qwen3_moe/ # Qwen3 with MoE layers
nemotron_v3/ # Hybrid mamba-attention1.4 Identify custom components
Check whether the model needs:
- Custom attention: GQA (standard), MLA (DeepSeek/Mistral4), sliding window, bidirectional
- Custom RoPE: Standard (Llama), YaRN scaling, NTK-aware, complex-number (DeepSeek)
- Custom normalization: RMSNorm (standard), LayerNorm, different eps values
- Custom MLP: SwiGLU (standard), GeGLU, ReLU-squared, MoE routing
- Custom config class: Needed only if HF
AutoConfigcannot parse the model'sconfig.json(checkauto_mapfield)
1.5 Note dimensions for test config
For unit tests, create a tiny config. Target: ~1M parameters or less.
# Example tiny config for a Llama-like model:
tiny_config = LlamaConfig(
hidden_size=64,
intermediate_size=128,
num_hidden_layers=2,
num_attention_heads=4,
num_key_value_heads=2,
vocab_size=256,
max_position_embeddings=128,
)Phase 2: Implementation
2.1 Create directory structure
components/models/<name>/
__init__.py
model.py
state_dict_adapter.py # Only if HF weight names or tensor layouts need conversion
config.py # Only if HF config is insufficient
layers.py # Only for MoE / MLA / other non-standard layers
rope_utils.py # Only for custom RoPE2.2 Implementation order
Implement files in dependency order:
- config.py (if needed) -- Custom
PretrainedConfigsubclass - rope_utils.py (if needed) -- RoPE implementation
- layers.py (if needed) -- Attention, MLP, decoder block classes
- model.py -- The main
ForCausalLM(orForConditionalGeneration) class - state_dict_adapter.py (if needed) -- HF weight conversion. Treat checkpoint I/O performance as part of the implementation, and evaluate the low-memory DCP capability as described in Section 2.6.
- init.py -- Re-export the main model class
See the pattern files for detailed implementation guidance:
- Dense LLM: llm-patterns.md
- MoE: moe-patterns.md
- VLM: vlm-patterns.md
- Capabilities and fp32 precision: capabilities-and-precision.md
Most custom models need state_dict_adapter.py for HF weight conversion.
Omit the file and attribute only when HF names and tensor layouts already match
across supported backend/config variants, as in Llama, Qwen2, and Qwen3.
Weight tying remains the model's responsibility (Section 2.3).
2.3 Causal LM weight tying
Every registered model class with a causal lm_head must:
- Declare
tie_word_embeddings_support: TieSupportasBOTH,TIED_ONLY, orUNTIED_ONLY. - Call
reject_unsupported_tie_word_embeddings(type(self), config)at the top of__init__, using the original config before unwrappingtext_configorthinker_config.
Only classes with no causal LM head may be explicitly exempted from the registry test.
Choose the policy from the implementation and the actual supported checkpoint configs, not from a bare config constructor:
BOTH: tied and untied configurations are both supported.TIED_ONLY: only a tied configuration is supported.UNTIED_ONLY: only an untied configuration is supported.
Runtime helpers must treat TIED_ONLY and UNTIED_ONLY as authoritative and
only resolve a per-checkpoint config flag for BOTH. All current BOTH VLMs
honor the outer tie_word_embeddings flag, so do not add a model-specific
resolver until a supported BOTH model actually requires another config path.
For BOTH and TIED_ONLY, always declare _tied_weights_keys and implement
tie_weights() with the actual lm_head and input-embedding FQNs. Do not rely
on inherited Hugging Face tying, and re-tie after any language-model swap.
Add policy-specific tests:
BOTH: tied aliases; untied does not alias.TIED_ONLY: tied aliases; untied is rejected.UNTIED_ONLY: weights stay separate; tied is rejected.
Do not tie architectures with intentionally separate heads, asymmetric vocab sizes, or stages that do not own both tensors.
For from_pretrained, the checkpoint's saved tie_word_embeddings value is
authoritative, even for BOTH. The NeMoAuto* bridge rejects flips in either
direction. A model-owned from_pretrained that bypasses that bridge must call
reject_tie_word_embeddings_flip(checkpoint_config, requested_config,
model_class_name).
2.4 MoE state-dict adapter checklist
For MoE models, verify all weights below. When their HF and native layouts differ, the adapter must explicitly map:
- Router weights, including gate bias or correction-bias tensors when the Hugging Face model has them.
- Expert weights, preserving expert index order across local and routed experts.
- Gate/up/down projections, including combined or split projection layouts.
- Shared experts separately from routed experts when the architecture has both.
Add tests that assert expected key mappings and run numerical equivalence with tiny configs before trying full checkpoints.
For MoE PEFT, preserve pretrained router correction biases and verify adapter save/reload/resume using the router-bias checks.
Do not use these shortcuts:
- Do not validate the adapter only by calling
from_pretrained(). - Do not accept missing or extra expert keys without an explicit mapping reason.
- Do not change dtype, transpose dimensions, or reshape tensors unless the HF and NeMo layouts require it and a test proves the conversion is reversible.
- Do not skip router or shared-expert tests because dense-layer tests pass.
2.5 VLM onboarding checklist
For VLMs, confirm the Hugging Face config has vision_config and text_config
and that architectures points to a conditional-generation class. Start from
the closest VLM pattern file, usually vlm-patterns.md, and
compare existing implementations such as mistral4, kimivl, or
kimi_k25_vl.
The implementation should explicitly cover:
- Text backbone, vision tower, projector, and processor or image preprocessing assumptions.
- Checkpoint compatibility for both text and vision modules, with adapter mappings where needed.
- Registration of the
ForConditionalGenerationclass in_transformers/registry.py. - Tiny tests that exercise image-text inputs and verify checkpoint load/export, plus adapter round-trip when present.
2.6 Checkpoint I/O performance
Treat checkpoint performance as an implementation requirement, not a later optimization. For every new or materially changed state-dict adapter, evaluate both latency and peak host/device memory for loading and for any save or export path the change affects. In particular:
- Avoid full-checkpoint or model-sized temporary copies when tensors can load directly into final model storage or be transformed in bounded parts.
- Keep distributed reads and conversions rank-local when a rank needs only its shard; do not materialize a global tensor on every rank unnecessarily.
- Avoid repeated tensor merges, copies, full-heap garbage collections, shard scans, or file opens inside model-sized loops.
- Record representative before/after latency and peak-memory evidence for an optimized path, including the model, dtype, backend, and topology.
Every adapter must evaluate supports_low_memory_dcp_load. Set
_supports_low_memory_dcp_load = True only when most checkpoint tensors write
directly into final model storage and every remaining allocating conversion has
a small, bounded temporary footprint for every runtime variant that reports
support. Keep it false when a backend, topology, dtype, quantization mode, or
model option requires model-sized rebuilding. A false value selects the safe
fallback; it does not mean checkpoint loading is unsupported.
An opt-in needs focused tests that write sentinel values through direct destinations and prove the final model storage changes, bound any allocating conversions, and verify unsafe runtime variants report the capability as false. This storage test is also a correctness requirement: a false positive can cause the adapter to treat a temporary tensor as loaded in place and skip rebuilding the real parameter.
2.7 Register in registry
Add the model to MODEL_ARCH_MAPPING in _transformers/registry.py:
# In _transformers/registry.py
MODEL_ARCH_MAPPING = OrderedDict([
# ... existing entries ...
(
"NewModelForCausalLM",
("nemo_automodel.components.models.new_model.model", "NewModelForCausalLM"),
),
])If the model has a custom config class with auto_map in its config.json, also register in _CUSTOM_CONFIG_REGISTRATIONS:
_CUSTOM_CONFIG_REGISTRATIONS: Dict[str, Tuple[str, str]] = {
# ... existing entries ...
"new_model": ("nemo_automodel.components.models.new_model.configuration", "NewModelConfig"),
}2.8 Declare capabilities and precision-sensitive params
Every class registered in MODEL_ARCH_MAPPING must declare parallelism
capabilities, either with a static nested ModelCapabilities dataclass or a
variant-aware get_capabilities(cls, config) method. Pick exactly one pattern.
Capabilities should reflect recipe YAMLs that have been validated end to end.
If the model has precision-sensitive parameters such as Mamba A_log /
dt_bias, MoE sigmoid gate bias, attention-sink bias, or per-head scale,
declare _keep_in_fp32_modules_strict so sharding keeps those params in fp32
compute. See capabilities-and-precision.md
for examples, variant dispatch rules, and frozen-submodule dtype guidance.
Phase 3: Onboarding Example Config
This phase is only for adding a minimal example config that proves the newly onboarded architecture can load and run. Use nemo-automodel-recipe-development for general recipe authoring or existing recipe modifications.
3.1 Create example YAML config
Create an example config under examples/llm_finetune/<name>/ (or examples/vlm_finetune/<name>/):
For new full-parameter Adam/AdamW examples, set model.dtype: float32.
See training precision
for compute precision and other training modes.
model:
_target_: nemo_automodel.NeMoAutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained
pretrained_model_name_or_path: <org>/<model-name>
dtype: float32
trainer:
max_steps: 100
gradient_clip_val: 1.0
accumulate_grad_batches: 1
# ... data, optimizer config ...3.2 Verify model loads
Test that the model loads from a HuggingFace checkpoint:
from nemo_automodel import NeMoAutoModelForCausalLM
model = NeMoAutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained("<org>/<model-name>")3.3 Test with tiny config first
Before using full-size models, verify with a tiny config (1-2 layers, small hidden dim) to catch shape mismatches early.
Phase 4: Tests
Create tests/unit_tests/models/<name>/ and cover the checks below before
loading full checkpoints:
- Forward-shape smoke test with a tiny config.
- State-dict adapter round-trip, when present:
from_hf -> to_hfpreserves mapped names, shapes, dtypes, and values. - HF load/export and native save/reload preserve weights and ties, with or
without an adapter; see
tests/unit_tests/checkpoint/test_native_hf_state_dict.py. - Layer equivalence tests for every rewritten attention, MLP, normalization,
RoPE, or MoE layer. Use the model dtype from config, identical seeded weights,
identical inputs, and dtype-appropriate
torch.allclosetolerances. - Short functional test that verifies loss decreases over a few training steps.
Phase 5: Documentation
5.1 Update model coverage page
Edit the appropriate file in docs/model-coverage/:
- LLM/MoE:
docs/model-coverage/llm/index.md - VLM:
docs/model-coverage/vlm/index.md
Add a row with the model name, supported features (TP, PP, FSDP, LoRA, QLoRA), and any limitations.
Phase 6: Parity Testing
After implementation and unit tests are complete, run the full parity-testing workflow to verify that the new model produces numerically equivalent results to the reference HuggingFace implementation.
Run three levels of comparison:
- State-dict round-trip: load a reference HuggingFace checkpoint, convert it into the NeMo AutoModel layout, export it back, and verify that all mapped tensors match the reference names, shapes, dtypes, and values within the expected tolerance.
- Component-level parity: compare rewritten attention, MLP, normalization, RoPE, and MoE components against the HuggingFace implementation with fixed seeds and identical dtype.
- End-to-end forward pass: run the full NeMo AutoModel and HuggingFace model on the same tokenized input and compare logits, hidden states, and loss.
Do not skip this phase. A model that passes unit tests can still diverge from HF due to subtle weight-conversion bugs, backend differences, or RoPE mismatches that only surface in a full parity comparison.
Key Files Reference
| File | Purpose |
_transformers/registry.py | MODEL_ARCH_MAPPING and _CUSTOM_CONFIG_REGISTRATIONS |
components/models/common/__init__.py | Exports BackendConfig, HFCheckpointingMixin, and backend construction utilities |
components/models/llama/model.py | Separate attention and MLP projections with HF-compatible weights |
components/checkpoint/state_dict_adapter.py | Optional StateDictAdapter conversion contract |
components/models/common/hf_checkpointing_mixin.py | HFCheckpointingMixin for save/load |
components/models/common/utils.py | BackendConfig, initialize_rms_norm_module, initialize_linear_module, get_rope_config |
components/moe/config.py | MoEConfig dataclass |
components/moe/fsdp_mixin.py | MoEFSDPSyncMixin for distributed expert handling |
components/moe/layers.py | MoE layer, MLP (dense) for MoE blocks |
components/moe/experts.py | GroupedExperts, GroupedExpertsDeepEP, GroupedExpertsTE |
Checklist
- Fetched and analyzed
config.jsonfrom HuggingFace - Determined model type (dense LLM / MoE / VLM)
- Identified custom components (attention, RoPE, normalization, MLP)
- Created
components/models/<name>/directory - Implemented config.py (if custom config needed)
- Implemented layers.py (if custom layers needed)
- Implemented rope_utils.py (if custom RoPE needed)
- Implemented model.py with
HFCheckpointingMixin - Implemented state_dict_adapter.py if needed; evaluated checkpoint latency and peak memory per Section 2.6
- For adapters, evaluated
supports_low_memory_dcp_load; any opt-in proves direct destinations reach model storage, bounds allocating conversions, and reportsFalsefor unsafe variants - Implemented init.py with re-export
- Registered in
MODEL_ARCH_MAPPINGin_transformers/registry.py - Registered custom config in
_CUSTOM_CONFIG_REGISTRATIONS(if applicable) - Declared
ModelCapabilitiesnested dataclass (static) ORget_capabilities(cls, config)classmethod (variant dispatch, e.g. ERNIE-4.5 MoE vs dense) — never both, never neither - Declared
TieSupportand called the constructor guard for every class with a causallm_head(or added an explicit no-head exemption) -- see §2.3 - Added explicit
_tied_weights_keysandtie_weights()forBOTH/TIED_ONLY, plus policy-specific alias and rejection tests -- see §2.3 - Guarded any model-owned
from_pretrainedthat bypasses theNeMoAuto*bridge against checkpoint flips -- see §2.3 - Created example YAML config
- Verified model loads via
NeMoAutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained() - Created unit tests (forward shape, state_dict round-trip)
- Verified MoE PEFT router freezing and adapter save/reload/resume per LoRA for MoE
- Declared
_keep_in_fp32_modules_strictfor every intrinsically-fp32 param (SSMA_log/dt_bias, MambaDwhen reference-fp32, MoE gate bias, attention-sink bias,scale, …) — see §2.8 - Created layer equivalence tests for every rewritten layer (matching model dtype)
- Created functional tests (training loss decreases)
- Updated docs/model-coverage page
- Ran state-dict round-trip, component parity, and E2E forward-pass parity checks
- Set
ModelClass = <Name>ForCausalLMat module bottom
Trending
More talk lately.about the whole repository
Who's talking about NVIDIA-NeMo/Automodel
- NVIDIA/Megatron-LM“DeepSeek-V4 training support”GitHub · Apr 24, 2026 · 27 reactions
- THUDM/slime“[Roadmap][Megatron, VLM] Support VLM”GitHub · Dec 12, 2025 · 6 reactions
- NVIDIA-NeMo/RL“Automodel bump up + Refactor to use the generic CP interface to be provided by Automodel”GitHub · Jul 23, 2026 · 1 reactions
- NVIDIA-NeMo/Megatron-Bridge“[model] Add verified Nemotron 3 Nano 4B CPT support”GitHub · Jul 20, 2026 · 1 reactions
- NVIDIA-NeMo/RL“chore: major version bump (torch 2.8, vllm 0.11, ray 2.49) & SP fixes”GitHub · Oct 10, 2025 · 1 reactions
The biggest 5 of 43 mentions linking to the repository that our crawl found. Each line is their own headline.
See all 43
Talked about on GitHub (43 times).
On GitHub · 43
- Apr 24, 2026DeepSeek-V4 training support — NVIDIA/Megatron-LM27 reactions · 5 comments
- Dec 12, 2025[Roadmap][Megatron, VLM] Support VLM — THUDM/slime6 reactions · 2 comments
- Jul 23, 2026Automodel bump up + Refactor to use the generic CP interface to be provided by Automodel — NVIDIA-NeMo/RL1 reaction · 1 comment
- Jul 20, 2026[model] Add verified Nemotron 3 Nano 4B CPT support — NVIDIA-NeMo/Megatron-Bridge1 reaction · 1 comment
- Oct 10, 2025chore: major version bump (torch 2.8, vllm 0.11, ray 2.49) & SP fixes — NVIDIA-NeMo/RL1 reaction · 41 comments
38 more on GitHub
- Oct 16, 2026fix(automodel): release MoE dispatcher state before colocated offload — NVIDIA-NeMo/RL0 reactions · 4 comments
- Oct 15, 2026feat(speechlm): add native Automodel GSPO ASR recipe — NVIDIA-NeMo/RL0 reactions · 13 comments
- Oct 15, 2026feat(speechlm): support native RL checkpoints and frozen CTC export — NVIDIA-NeMo/Speech0 reactions · 20 comments
- Oct 15, 2026feat(audio): align ASR scoring and support explicit Ray launches — NVIDIA-NeMo/Skills0 reactions · 1 comment
- Oct 14, 2026fix(cutedsl): support CUTLASS DSL 4.4.2 and 4.6.2 — SandAI-org/MagiAttention0 reactions · 2 comments
- Oct 13, 2026An old, unused torchao install makes every LoRA/OFT injection fail with ImportError (e.g. on Colab and Kaggle) — huggingface/peft0 reactions · 6 comments
- Sep 28, 2026fix(build): use C++20 for PyTorch extensions — SandAI-org/MagiAttention0 reactions · 3 comments
- Sep 28, 2026Fix SpeechLM Automodel precision and vLLM audio handling — NVIDIA-NeMo/Speech0 reactions · 8 comments
- Sep 23, 2026chore(customizer): add magi_attention dependency in automodel — NVIDIA-NeMo/nemo-helix0 reactions · 2 comments
- Sep 16, 2026docs: reference NeMo AutoModel and bring the recipe notes up to date — mraad/feln-lora0 reactions · 5 comments
- Sep 16, 2026fix(customizer): install seed deps in grpo env + dtensor v2 ckpt crash — NVIDIA-NeMo/nemo-helix0 reactions · 2 comments
- Sep 16, 2026feat(speechlm2): add DFlash and DFlash2 training for SALM — NVIDIA-NeMo/Speech0 reactions · 9 comments
- Sep 9, 2026build(deps-dev): bump nvidia-modelopt from 0.44.0 to 0.46.0 — HuipengHuang/verl-baseline0 reactions
- Sep 1, 2026[Feature Request] Add text-only GRPO support for Qwen3.8-Flash-Next (qwen4_exp) — verl-project/verl0 reactions
- Aug 4, 2026Add training submodules for RunPod environment — witchking999/muramasaIII0 reactions
- Aug 1, 2026[feature] Support DSpark speculative decoding draft training — NVIDIA-NeMo/Megatron-Bridge0 reactions · 5 comments
- Jul 31, 2026[feature] DeepSeekV4 + FP8 RL — NVIDIA-NeMo/labs-molt0 reactions
- Jul 30, 2026Integrate NeMo Automodel Qwen3.5-35B-A3B recipe with MFSDP v2 — NVIDIA/Megatron-LM0 reactions
- Jul 17, 2026cuDNN fused-MHA SDPA backend intermittently fails with "mha_graph.execute(...).is_good() == false" during Qwen3-VL image+text inference on H200 / cuDNN 9.20 — pytorch/pytorch0 reactions · 5 comments
- Jul 16, 2026[DSpark] Add dspark dense draft model — sgl-project/sglang0 reactions · 2 comments
- Jun 11, 2026feat(speechlm2): add Multi-Token Prediction (MTP) training support to SALMAutomodel — NVIDIA-NeMo/Speech0 reactions · 2 comments
- May 14, 2026CUDA codegen LogFatals on `boolx8` from sparse-MLA bwd kernel on B300/sm_103 (TileLang 0.1.9) — tile-ai/tilelang0 reactions · 1 comment
- May 10, 2026fix(automodel): support combined projection tensor sync — NVIDIA-NeMo/RL0 reactions · 1 comment
- Apr 24, 2026Track DeepSeek V4 upstream dependency blockers — zpqiu/RL0 reactions · 3 comments
- Apr 24, 2026Support DSV4 Flash — NVIDIA-NeMo/RL0 reactions · 1 comment
- Apr 23, 2026Qwen3.5 Automodel path is slower than MCore because flash-linear-attention (FLA) is not installed by default — NVIDIA-NeMo/RL0 reactions · 5 comments
- Apr 23, 2026Qwen3.5 MoE Automodel path does not use FP32 master weights by default, causing slower convergence — NVIDIA-NeMo/RL0 reactions
- Apr 20, 2026fix(pre-commit): preserve matched filenames in `no-underscore-md` hook — NVIDIA-NeMo/FW-CI-templates0 reactions
- Apr 17, 2026Track Qwen3.5-related issues — NVIDIA-NeMo/RL0 reactions
- Feb 10, 2026Support transformers v5 — ByteDance-Seed/VeOmni0 reactions · 1 comment
- Jan 11, 2026feat: Add NVIDIA Embed Nemotron embedding model support — paiml/trueno-rag0 reactions · 1 comment
- Dec 25, 2025ImportError: cannot import name 'TransformersKwargs' from 'transformers.utils' — iqiancheng/llms-cookbook0 reactions · 1 comment
- Dec 25, 2025ImportError: /opt/hpcx/ucc/lib/libucc.so.1: undefined symbol: ucs_config_doc_nop — iqiancheng/llms-cookbook0 reactions · 1 comment
- Nov 12, 2025layer-by-layer comparison tool between policy/generation — NVIDIA-NeMo/RL0 reactions
- Sep 25, 2025Use scale and clip grads utilties from Automodel for DTensor v2 — NVIDIA-NeMo/RL0 reactions
- Sep 8, 2025gemma 27b slow on v2 — NVIDIA-NeMo/RL0 reactions · 1 comment
- Sep 5, 2025Gemma3 27B crashes on 8 nodes with Sequence Parallel — NVIDIA-NeMo/RL0 reactions
- Sep 5, 2025Gemma3 27B crashes on 16 nodes w/ FSDP — NVIDIA-NeMo/RL0 reactions · 1 comment
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 1
- NVIDIA/skills★ 3.8k100% same
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository12 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- build-and-dependencySkill
- cicdSkill
- fern-docsSkill
- linting-and-formattingSkill
- parity-testingSkill
- testingSkill
- nemo-automodel-distributed-trainingSkill
- nemo-automodel-launcher-configSkill
- nemo-automodel-recipe-developmentSkill
- pr-reviewSkill
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
Reviews can't be read right now.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

