agentleFS
NVIDIA-DOCANVIDIA-DOCA/doca-skills/skills/libs/doca-rmax/SKILL.md

doca-rmax

Skill8 starsChanged 16 days agoLicence not identifiedView on GitHub

DOCA Rivermax (doca_rmax) receive streams for timing-precise media over IP (SMPTE ST 2110 video / audio, market data, scientific feeds) on a target BlueField DPU (DOCA Rivermax apps run only there), once the Rivermax libraries and license are installed; getting them is doca-setup / doca-public-knowledge-map territory. Trigger on "ST 2110 receive isn't getting frames", "sub-microsecond jitter on my media receiver", "NOT_SUPPORTED from doca_rmax_init", "no recv events after stream start", or "license check failing on a media receiver", even without naming Rivermax. Covers doca_rmax_in_stream sessions, the SDK + license precondition check, doca_rmax_get_*_supported capability queries, pairing with doca-eth queues and doca-flow steering, and DOCA_ERROR_* from Rivermax calls. Refuse and route elsewhere for programming the underlying queue (doca-eth), steering rules (doca-flow), PTP / clock sync (doca-firefly), or best-effort packet I/O.

1 other project uses a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

4 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈2

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

The licence could not be identified — read it at the source. We count its rules but don't quote them. Read them on GitHub.

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.