agentleFS
MsNanMsNan/bishe-doc-skills/skills/thesis-proposal/SKILL.md

thesis-proposal

Skill0 starsChanged 21 days agoMITView on GitHub

计算机类毕业设计开题报告 / 任务书写作(选题意义、国内外现状、研究内容、技术路线、进度安排)。写开题报告、任务书、选题申请时使用。

1 other project uses a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

  • Other versions1 project uses a version of this.

    Word for word · 0

    None found.

    Edited · 0

    None found.

    Wrote their own version · 1

    1. KhaledSaeed18/dotclaude★ 5same name

    How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.

  • In this repository6 other files it gives its agents.

The file

Files
SKILL.md

开题报告 / 任务书

先问清楚再写

动笔前向用户确认(缺什么问什么,不要自己编):

  1. 题目、专业、学校对开题报告的模板或字数要求(常见 3000–5000 字)
  2. 系统类型(Web 管理系统 / 小程序 / App / 算法类)和技术栈
  3. 已有的参考文献(没有就只给检索建议,不要编造文献)
  4. 学校规定的进度节点(开题、中期、查重、答辩日期)

标准结构

  1. 选题背景与意义:现实问题 → 现有做法的不足 → 本系统解决什么;理论意义、实际意义各 1 段,不写空话。
  2. 国内外研究现状:按「方向/代表性系统或方法/不足」组织,每条观点对应一篇真实文献 [n];最后一段总结现有不足,自然引出本课题。
  3. 研究内容:列 4–6 个功能模块 + 关键技术点(如权限控制、数据统计、推荐算法),说明每个模块要做到什么程度。
  4. 技术路线 / 研究方法:技术选型理由(为什么 Vue3 而不是 jQuery、为什么 MySQL)、系统架构一句话、开发方法(原型法/迭代)、测试方法。建议配一张技术路线图(用 mermaid 草稿,用户再画正式图)。
  5. 预期成果与创新点:创新点要具体、可验证,1–3 条即可,不要夸大成「国内首创」。
  6. 进度安排:表格,按周或按月,和学校节点对齐,留出查重和修改时间。
  7. 参考文献:按 GB/T 7714-2015(见 thesis-writing 技能)。

任务书

任务书比开题报告短,通常包括:设计内容与要求、主要技术指标(如「支持 3 种角色」「列表页支持分页查询」)、进度、参考资料。技术指标写可量化、可验收的。

红线

  • 不编造文献、数据、调查结果;用户没给的文献只能写「建议检索:知网关键词 xxx」。
  • 不承诺论文能过查重;引用要标注。
  • 遵守学校关于使用 AI 辅助写作的规定,提醒用户自己核对和改写。

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.