agentleFS
Moussaoui-GhilesMoussaoui-Ghiles/claude-skills/skills/google-maps-owner-email-finder/SKILL.md

google-maps-owner-email-finder

Skill4 starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub

Research owner evidence and public website emails for a local-business CSV without paid APIs, then return a reviewable result that preserves unknowns.

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

16 rules. About 0 are common, 9 are distinctive, and 7 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈9

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 7

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Use a CSV with these headers:

    line 14
  2. Very specific:

    Use the google-maps-list-builder skill first when the Maps export still needs normalization, deduplication, or company-fit review.

    line 22
  3. Very specific:

    Read every JSON file under run/evidence/.

    line 56
  4. Distinctive:

    Use these owner states:

    line 58
  5. Very specific:

    Use explicit only for explicit owner or proprietor language.

    line 66
  6. Distinctive:

    Use pages on the supplied company website.

    line 67
  7. Very specific:

    If two pages conflict, use unknown and explain the conflict in notes.

    line 68
  8. Distinctive:

    Never infer a person from the company name.

    line 69
  9. Distinctive:

    Never generate an email from a name and domain pattern.

    line 70
  10. Distinctive:

    Use an email only when it appears on a cited public website page.

    line 74
  11. Very specific:

    Keep the exact page in email_source_url.

    line 82
  12. Distinctive:

    If the page publishes only a generic address, keep it.

    line 84
  13. Very specific:

    If no public email appears, leave public_email and email_source_url empty.

    line 86
  14. Distinctive:

    every input company has one output row.

    line 118
  15. Distinctive:

    every owner claim has a cited page and supporting text.

    line 119
  16. Very specific:

    every email is copied from a cited public page and marked published_unverified.

    line 121

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 308,232 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Google Maps Owner and Email Finder

Turn a local-business company file into cited owner findings and public website emails. The workflow runs locally without a paid API.

Expect unknown results. The workflow does not verify email deliverability or guess email patterns.

Required input

Use a CSV with these headers:

company_name,website

Optional columns such as place_id, address, phone, source_url, and observed_at may remain in the file. The collector reads only the company name and website.

Use the google-maps-list-builder skill first when the Maps export still needs normalization, deduplication, or company-fit review.

Step 1: Collect website evidence

From this skill folder, run:

node scripts/collect-website-evidence.mjs --input=path/to/companies.csv --output-dir=run

Optional limits:

node scripts/collect-website-evidence.mjs \
  --input=path/to/companies.csv \
  --output-dir=run \
  --max-pages=20 \
  --concurrency=3

The collector:

  • visits the company homepage;
  • follows direct About, Team, Story, Leadership and Contact links;
  • collects sentences that mention ownership or leadership roles;
  • collects email addresses published on the visited pages;
  • records the page URL for every result;
  • rejects local, private, non-HTTP and oversized targets;
  • saves one JSON evidence file per company plus evidence-index.csv.

It does not decide who the owner is.

Step 2: Review the evidence

Read every JSON file under run/evidence/. Create run/owners.csv using templates/owners-output.csv as the header contract.

Use these owner states:

  • explicit: a cited public page explicitly identifies the named person as the owner or proprietor of the same business.
  • unknown: the evidence does not support a defensible owner claim or sources conflict.

Rules:

  1. Preserve the role exactly as the page states it. Founder, president and CEO do not mean owner without explicit ownership wording.
  2. Use explicit only for explicit owner or proprietor language.
  3. Use pages on the supplied company website. Do not substitute LinkedIn profiles, directory listings or AI answers.
  4. If two pages conflict, use unknown and explain the conflict in notes.
  5. Never infer a person from the company name.
  6. Never generate an email from a name and domain pattern.

Step 3: Record public emails

Use an email only when it appears on a cited public website page.

Set:

email_status=published_unverified

Keep the exact page in email_source_url.

If the page publishes only a generic address, keep it. Do not relabel it as the owner's direct email.

If no public email appears, leave public_email and email_source_url empty.

Step 4: Audit the result

Run:

node scripts/audit-results.mjs --input=run/owners.csv

The audit rejects:

  • owner claims without evidence;
  • explicit claims without owner or proprietor language in the saved evidence text;
  • public emails without published_unverified;
  • emails without a source URL;
  • emails that do not appear in the saved evidence for the cited source page;
  • generated-looking or malformed email values;
  • unsupported status values.

The audit checks the file contract. A person must still review every claimed owner against the cited page before outreach.

Output contract

Return owners.csv with:

company_name,website,owner_name,owner_role,owner_status,evidence_url,evidence_text,public_email,email_status,email_source_url,notes

Complete when:

  • every input company has one output row;
  • every owner claim has a cited page and supporting text;
  • unsupported or conflicting owners remain unknown;
  • every email is copied from a cited public page and marked published_unverified;
  • the audit passes;
  • a person reviews the claimed-owner rows.

What this does not include

The package starts with a reviewed company CSV and stops at a reviewed owner-and-email CSV. It does not collect the Maps list, use LinkedIn, run paid enrichment, verify deliverability or send outreach.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.