document-review
Skill33 starsChanged 6 months agoMITView on GitHub
Audits brand/ files for completeness, consistency, and freshness. Use when the agent or user wants to review brand files, audit marketing docs, check brand consistency, verify brand health, or assess what's missing from brand memory. Produces a structured audit report with per-file scores, cross-file contradiction detection, staleness flags, and recommended next skills to run. This is the quality gate for the brand memory system. Also use when someone says 'check my brand', 'brand audit', 'what's missing', 'is my brand ready', 'brand health', 'review my marketing docs', or before running any campaign to verify brand foundations are solid.
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
9 rules. 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 6 edited versions we read keep these.
5
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
4
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 16
Verify brand/ directory exists.
- Very specific: line 17
Read all 9 brand/ files (or confirm which are missing).
- Distinctive: line 19
Run all four phases sequentially.
- Very specific: line 61
Look for lines like - Tone: with no value after the colon
- Distinctive: line 62
Look for empty table rows
- Very specific: line 63
Look for <!-- Generated by mktg init.
- Distinctive: line 114
Profile files: Check file modification date.
- Distinctive: line 115
Append-only files: Always considered current if they exist (they accumulate, not expire).
- Distinctive: line 202
Always map recommendations to specific skills:
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 6 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
/document-review — Brand Document Audit
You audit the brand/ directory for quality: completeness, consistency, and freshness. You report problems — you never fix them. Fixes belong to domain skills (e.g., /audience-research fixes audience.md).
For brand memory protocol, see /cmo rules/brand-memory.md.
On Activation
- Verify
brand/directory exists. If it does not exist, report Overall Health as Not Started and recommendmktg init. Skip all phases. - Read all 9
brand/files (or confirm which are missing). - Determine audit scope based on user request.
- Run all four phases sequentially.
Phase 0: Assess Scope
| Request | Scope |
| "review brand files" | Full brand/ audit (default) |
| "check audience.md" | Single-file deep review |
| "is my brand consistent?" | Consistency-only (Phase 2) |
| "what's stale?" | Freshness-only (Phase 3) |
| No specific request | Full brand/ audit |
For single-file reviews, still cross-reference against other brand files for consistency.
Phase 1: Completeness Check
For each of the 10 brand files, assess status:
Profile Files (7)
These should contain substantive content beyond the template scaffold.
| File | Key Sections | Owner Skill |
voice-profile.md | Voice DNA (tone, personality, vocabulary), do/don't examples | /brand-voice |
positioning.md | Core positioning (category, for, unlike, we), angles | /positioning-angles |
audience.md | Primary audience (who, pain points, watering holes), personas | /audience-research |
competitors.md | Named competitors with positioning, strengths, weaknesses | /competitive-intel |
keyword-plan.md | Priority keywords table (keyword, intent, difficulty, priority) | /keyword-research |
creative-kit.md | Brand colors, typography, visual style | /creative |
stack.md | Available tools (email, social, video, search, media) | mktg init |
Scoring:
| Score | Meaning | Criteria |
| complete | Ready for use | File exists, has substantive content beyond template, key sections populated |
| partial | Needs work | File exists but some key sections are empty or still contain template placeholders (<!-- Generated by mktg init --> without real content below) |
| empty | Template only | File exists but matches the mktg init template exactly (no customization) |
| missing | Not created | File does not exist |
How to detect template-only content:
- Look for lines like
- **Tone:**with no value after the colon - Look for empty table rows
- Look for
<!-- Generated by mktg init. Fill in or let /cmo build this. -->as the only substantive comment - Profile files with fewer than 5 lines of real content (excluding headers and comments) are likely empty
Append-Only Files (2)
| File | Purpose | Owner |
assets.md | Log of created assets | All skills (append) |
learnings.md | What worked, what didn't, audience insights | All skills (append) |
Scoring:
| Score | Meaning | Criteria |
| complete | Has entries | File exists with dated entries |
| empty | No entries | File exists but contains only the header/comment |
| missing | Not created | File does not exist |
Append-only files are never "partial" — they either have entries or they don't.
Phase 2: Consistency Check
Cross-reference files for contradictions. Only check files that are complete or partial (skip empty and missing).
Cross-References to Check
| Check | Files Involved | What to Look For |
| Audience alignment | positioning.md ↔ audience.md | Does positioning's "For:" match audience's primary persona? |
| Voice-brand fit | voice-profile.md ↔ positioning.md | Does the tone match the brand positioning? (e.g., playful voice + enterprise positioning = mismatch) |
| Keyword-positioning alignment | keyword-plan.md ↔ positioning.md | Do target keywords reflect the positioning angles? |
| Competitor consistency | competitors.md ↔ positioning.md | Are competitor names consistent across both files? |
| Audience-keyword fit | audience.md ↔ keyword-plan.md | Do keywords match the language/pain points of the target audience? |
| Stack-skill alignment | stack.md ↔ all profile files | Do other files reference tools or channels not listed in stack.md? |
| Creative-voice alignment | creative-kit.md ↔ voice-profile.md | Does visual style complement the voice? (e.g., minimalist design + maximalist voice = tension) |
| Learnings integration | learnings.md ↔ all profile files | Are learnings reflected in strategy? (e.g., learning says "short subject lines work" but voice profile favors long-form) |
Contradiction Severity
| Severity | Meaning | Example |
| high | Files directly contradict | Positioning targets "enterprise CTOs" but audience.md says "indie developers" |
| medium | Files are misaligned but not contradictory | Voice is "casual and fun" but positioning is "premium and exclusive" |
| low | Minor inconsistency | Different competitor names used (abbreviation vs full name) |
Phase 3: Freshness Check
Flag files that may be outdated.
Freshness Rules
- Profile files: Check file modification date. Flag as stale if older than 30 days.
- Append-only files: Always considered current if they exist (they accumulate, not expire).
- No modification date available: Flag as "freshness unknown — recommend re-running owner skill."
Staleness Signals (Beyond Date)
- File references a competitor that no longer exists or has rebranded
- Positioning mentions a feature the product no longer has
- Keywords target trends that have passed
- Audience describes a persona the product has pivoted away from
Note these as "content staleness" separately from "date staleness."
Phase 4: Audit Report
Output a structured audit report. This is the primary deliverable.
Report Format
# Brand Audit Report
**Date:** YYYY-MM-DD
**Scope:** [Full audit | Single file | Consistency only | Freshness only]
**Overall Health:** [Healthy | Needs Attention | Incomplete | Not Started]
## Summary
- **Files:** X/9 complete, Y partial, Z empty, W missing
- **Contradictions:** X found (H high, M medium, L low)
- **Stale files:** X flagged
## Completeness
| File | Score | Notes |
|------|-------|-------|
| voice-profile.md | complete | All sections populated |
| positioning.md | partial | Missing "Unlike" differentiator |
| audience.md | missing | — |
| competitors.md | empty | Template only |
| keyword-plan.md | complete | 12 keywords mapped |
| creative-kit.md | partial | Colors defined, typography missing |
| stack.md | complete | 5 tools configured |
| assets.md | complete | 8 entries |
| learnings.md | empty | No entries yet |
## Contradictions
### [Severity]: [Short description]
- **Files:** file-a.md ↔ file-b.md
- **Detail:** [What contradicts what]
- **Recommendation:** [Which file to update and how]
## Freshness
| File | Last Modified | Status | Action |
|------|--------------|--------|--------|
| voice-profile.md | 15 days ago | current | — |
| positioning.md | 45 days ago | stale | Re-run /positioning-angles |
## Recommended Next Steps
Priority-ordered list of skills to run:
1. **Run `/audience-research`** — audience.md is missing. This blocks positioning and copy quality.
2. **Run `/positioning-angles`** — positioning.md is stale (45 days) and missing differentiator.
3. **Run `/competitive-intel`** — competitors.md is still template-only.Overall Health Scoring
| Health | Criteria |
| Healthy | 7+ files complete, 0 high contradictions, 0 stale files |
| Needs Attention | 5-6 files complete, or 1+ high contradictions, or 2+ stale files |
| Incomplete | 2-4 files complete, foundation gaps |
| Not Started | 0-1 files complete, brand/ mostly empty or missing |
Recommended Next Steps Logic
Priority order for recommendations:
- Missing foundation files (audience, positioning, voice-profile) — these unlock everything else
- High-severity contradictions — these corrupt downstream output
- Stale foundation files — outdated context is worse than no context
- Missing strategy files (keywords, competitors) — these improve targeting
- Empty append-only files — nice to have, build over time
- Missing creative files — needed for visual output skills
Always map recommendations to specific skills:
| Gap | Skill to Run |
| voice-profile.md missing/empty/stale | /brand-voice |
| positioning.md missing/empty/stale | /positioning-angles |
| audience.md missing/empty/stale | /audience-research |
| competitors.md missing/empty/stale | /competitive-intel |
| keyword-plan.md missing/empty/stale | /keyword-research |
| creative-kit.md missing/empty/stale | /creative |
| stack.md missing/empty | mktg init (re-run) |
| Contradictions between files | Skill that owns the less-accurate file |
| learnings.md empty | No action — accumulates naturally |
| assets.md empty | No action — accumulates naturally |
Anti-Patterns
| Anti-Pattern | Instead |
| Fixing files directly | Report the issue, recommend the owner skill |
| Overwriting brand files | Read-only audit. Never write to brand/ |
| Skipping files because they're empty | Score them as empty, recommend the fix |
| Reporting everything as high severity | Reserve "high" for direct contradictions |
| Generic recommendations ("improve your brand") | Specific: "Run /audience-research to fill audience.md" |
| Auditing non-brand files | Scope to brand/ directory only (extend later) |
Related Skills
- /cmo — Orchestrates skills including document-review for health checks
- /brand-voice — Fixes voice-profile.md issues
- /positioning-angles — Fixes positioning.md issues
- /audience-research — Fixes audience.md issues
- /competitive-intel — Fixes competitors.md issues
- /keyword-research — Fixes keyword-plan.md issues
- /creative — Fixes creative-kit.md issues
Other versions10 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 10
- iliaal/ai-skills★ 45same name
- oswarld/notion-skills★ 11same name
- shyamsridhar123/kevin-copilot★ 7same name
- xiejianjun000/FlowWiki★ 4same name
- CodeWithBehnam/cc-docs★ 2same name
- originalrashmi/rc-engine-product-framework★ 1same name
- 15yotsuka/claude-skills★ 0same name
- dss-time/repo-doctor-skills★ 0same name
- Kyungjong-kim/claude-code-harness★ 0same name
- thedigitalorganizer/soloship★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository79 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- studio/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- studio/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- agent-email-inboxSkill
- ai-seoSkill
- app-store-screenshotsSkill
- audience-researchSkill
- axiSkill
- brainstormSkill
- brand-kit-playgroundSkill
- brand-voiceSkill
- build-with-exaSkill
- churn-preventionSkill
- cmo-remotionSkill
- cmoSkill
- company-researchSkill
- competitive-intelSkill
- competitor-alternativesSkill
- content-atomizerSkill
- conversion-flow-croSkill
- create-skillSkill
- creativeSkill
- deepen-planSkill
- direct-response-copySkill
- email-sequencesSkill
- exa-contentsSkill
- exa-searchSkill
- firecrawlSkill
- free-tool-strategySkill
- frontend-slidesSkill
- higgsfield-generateSkill
- higgsfield-product-photoshootSkill
- higgsfield-soul-idSkill
- image-genSkill
- keyword-researchSkill
- landscape-scanSkill
- launch-strategySkill
- lead-generationSkill
- lead-magnetSkill
- manimce-best-practicesSkill
- manim-composerSkill
- manimgl-best-practicesSkill
- marketing-demoSkill
- marketing-psychologySkill
- mktg-setupSkill
- mktg-xSkill
- newsletterSkill
- off-page-seoSkill
- openseo-coachSkill
- openseo-competitive-landscapeSkill
- openseo-competitor-analysisSkill
- openseo-keyword-clusteringSkill
- openseo-keyword-researchSkill
- openseo-link-prospectingSkill
- openseo-project-setupSkill
- openseoSkill
- page-croSkill
- paper-marketingSkill
- positioning-anglesSkill
- The first 60 shown.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
Reviews can't be read right now.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

