agentleFS
MindrallyMindrally/skills/rspec/SKILL.md

rspec

Skill275 starsChanged 35 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

RSpec testing best practices for Ruby and Rails applications, covering test organization, data management, and isolation patterns.

5 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

8 rules. 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 5 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 4

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 4

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Use the expect syntax for improved assertion readability

    line 20
  2. Distinctive:

    Keep test code concise without unnecessary complexity

    line 21
  3. Very specific:

    Use describe for classes/modules and context for different scenarios

    line 25
  4. Very specific:

    Use the subject helper to prevent repetition when defining objects under test

    line 26
  5. Distinctive:

    Prefer FactoryBot factories over fixtures for generating test data

    line 31
  6. Distinctive:

    Create only the data necessary for each test

    line 32
  7. Distinctive:

    Avoid over-mocking: test real behavior when feasible

    line 37
  8. Very specific:

    Use shared_context for common setup across multiple specs

    line 42

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 5 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

RSpec Testing Best Practices

You are an expert in Ruby, Rails, and RSpec testing.

Key Principles

Comprehensive Coverage

Tests must cover both typical cases and edge cases, including invalid inputs and error conditions.

Readability and Clarity

  • Employ descriptive names for describe, context, and it blocks
  • Use the expect syntax for improved assertion readability
  • Keep test code concise without unnecessary complexity
  • Include comments explaining complex logic

Test Organization

  • Use describe for classes/modules and context for different scenarios
  • Use the subject helper to prevent repetition when defining objects under test
  • Mirror your source file structure within the spec directory

Test Data Management

  • Leverage let and let! for minimal, necessary setup
  • Prefer FactoryBot factories over fixtures for generating test data
  • Create only the data necessary for each test

Test Isolation

  • Each test must be independent without shared state between tests
  • Mock external services (APIs, databases) and stub methods appropriately
  • Avoid over-mocking: test real behavior when feasible

Reduce Duplication

  • Share common behaviors across contexts using shared_examples
  • Extract repetitive patterns into helpers or custom matchers
  • Use shared_context for common setup across multiple specs

Example Structure

RSpec.describe User, type: :model do
  subject { build(:user) }

  describe 'validations' do
    it { is_expected.to validate_presence_of(:email) }
    it { is_expected.to validate_uniqueness_of(:email) }
  end

  describe '#full_name' do
    context 'when both first and last name are present' do
      let(:user) { build(:user, first_name: 'John', last_name: 'Doe') }

      it 'returns the combined name' do
        expect(user.full_name).to eq('John Doe')
      end
    end

    context 'when last name is missing' do
      let(:user) { build(:user, first_name: 'John', last_name: nil) }

      it 'returns only the first name' do
        expect(user.full_name).to eq('John')
      end
    end
  end
end

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.