rspec
Skill275 starsChanged 35 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
RSpec testing best practices for Ruby and Rails applications, covering test organization, data management, and isolation patterns.
5 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- mukco/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 15, 2026
- G1Joshi/Agent-Skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- instructure/canvas-lmstheir own version, first seen Oct 8, 2026
- tuannv14/claude-team-toolkittheir own version, first seen May 5, 2026
- martinstreicher/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Feb 14, 2026
Other versions5 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 5
- instructure/canvas-lms★ 6.9ksame name
- G1Joshi/Agent-Skills★ 15same name
- tuannv14/claude-team-toolkit★ 1same name
- martinstreicher/claude-skills★ 0same name
- mukco/claude-skills★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository264 other files it gives its agents.
- accessibility-a11ySkill
- alpine-jsSkill
- analytics-data-analysisSkill
- android-developmentSkill
- angular-developmentSkill
- angularSkill
- anime-jsSkill
- anthropic-claude-developmentSkill
- api-developmentSkill
- apollo-graphqlSkill
- aspnet-coreSkill
- astroSkill
- auth0-authenticationSkill
- autogen-developmentSkill
- automl-hyperparameter-optimizationSkill
- aws-developmentSkill
- azureSkill
- backend-developmentSkill
- bash-scriptingSkill
- beautifulsoup-parsingSkill
- bitbucket-workflowSkill
- blazorSkill
- blender-python-addonSkill
- blockchainSkill
- bootstrapSkill
- business-central-developmentSkill
- cheerio-parsingSkill
- chrome-extension-developmentSkill
- ci-cd-best-practicesSkill
- clean-architectureSkill
- clean-codeSkill
- clerk-authenticationSkill
- cloudflare-developmentSkill
- computer-vision-opencvSkill
- convexSkill
- cppSkill
- c-sharpSkill
- cssSkill
- cypressSkill
- data-analysis-jupyterSkill
- data-analystSkill
- data-jupyter-pythonSkill
- deep-learning-pythonSkill
- deep-learning-pytorchSkill
- deep-learningSkill
- deno-typescriptSkill
- design-systemsSkill
- devopsSkill
- django-pythonSkill
- django-rest-api-developmentSkill
- dockerSkill
- dotnetSkill
- drizzle-ormSkill
- drupal-developmentSkill
- elasticsearch-best-practicesSkill
- electron-developmentSkill
- elixirSkill
- embedded-stm32Skill
- esbuild-bundlerSkill
- ethereumSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
8 rules. 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 5 edited versions we read keep these.
4
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
4
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 20
Use the expect syntax for improved assertion readability
- Distinctive: line 21
Keep test code concise without unnecessary complexity
- Very specific: line 25
Use describe for classes/modules and context for different scenarios
- Very specific: line 26
Use the subject helper to prevent repetition when defining objects under test
- Distinctive: line 31
Prefer FactoryBot factories over fixtures for generating test data
- Distinctive: line 32
Create only the data necessary for each test
- Distinctive: line 37
Avoid over-mocking: test real behavior when feasible
- Very specific: line 42
Use shared_context for common setup across multiple specs
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 5 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
RSpec Testing Best Practices
You are an expert in Ruby, Rails, and RSpec testing.
Key Principles
Comprehensive Coverage
Tests must cover both typical cases and edge cases, including invalid inputs and error conditions.
Readability and Clarity
- Employ descriptive names for
describe,context, anditblocks - Use the
expectsyntax for improved assertion readability - Keep test code concise without unnecessary complexity
- Include comments explaining complex logic
Test Organization
- Use
describefor classes/modules andcontextfor different scenarios - Use the
subjecthelper to prevent repetition when defining objects under test - Mirror your source file structure within the spec directory
Test Data Management
- Leverage
letandlet!for minimal, necessary setup - Prefer FactoryBot factories over fixtures for generating test data
- Create only the data necessary for each test
Test Isolation
- Each test must be independent without shared state between tests
- Mock external services (APIs, databases) and stub methods appropriately
- Avoid over-mocking: test real behavior when feasible
Reduce Duplication
- Share common behaviors across contexts using
shared_examples - Extract repetitive patterns into helpers or custom matchers
- Use
shared_contextfor common setup across multiple specs
Example Structure
RSpec.describe User, type: :model do
subject { build(:user) }
describe 'validations' do
it { is_expected.to validate_presence_of(:email) }
it { is_expected.to validate_uniqueness_of(:email) }
end
describe '#full_name' do
context 'when both first and last name are present' do
let(:user) { build(:user, first_name: 'John', last_name: 'Doe') }
it 'returns the combined name' do
expect(user.full_name).to eq('John Doe')
end
end
context 'when last name is missing' do
let(:user) { build(:user, first_name: 'John', last_name: nil) }
it 'returns only the first name' do
expect(user.full_name).to eq('John')
end
end
end
endDoes it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

