session-cost
Skill0 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub
Measure the token cost of one Claude Code session — main thread plus every sub-agent it dispatched. Slices a single session BY WHO-SPENT-IT; companion to `/mikko-skill-usage`, which slices the whole portfolio BY SKILL. Use for "what did this conversation cost so far?", "how much did that feature take?", or "which sub-agent was most expensive?". Reads the local `~/.claude/projects/<dir>/<session>.jsonl` transcripts and their `subagents/agent-*.jsonl` sidechains.
4 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- PeteChu/skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 11, 2026
- dewil/ai-toolkittheir own version, first seen Aug 25, 2026
- dewil/claude-toolkittheir own version, first seen Aug 25, 2026
- eldenjh/claude-usage-hudtheir own version, first seen Aug 11, 2026
Other versions4 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 4
- dewil/ai-toolkit★ 9same name
- dewil/claude-toolkit★ 9same name
- PeteChu/skills★ 1same name
- eldenjh/claude-usage-hud★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository15 other files it gives its agents.
- ai-codegen-smell-auditSkill
- auditSkill
- dotnet-auditSkill
- llm-injection-auditSkill
- mikko-audit-suiteSkill
- mikko-helpSkill
- mikko-installSkill
- mikko-skillsSkill
- react-anti-patterns-auditSkill
- readme-drift-syncSkill
- security-auditSkill
- skill-calibrationSkill
- skills-freshnessSkill
- skills-qualitySkill
- skill-usageSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
2 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈2
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 18
Use this when you want to retro a PR or a complex feature: "I spent this morning on the X task — what did it cost?
- Distinctive: line 140
Session still being written: Run after the next message lands or after a pause.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Session cost
Token-accounting for one Claude Code session. Walks the session's main JSONL plus every sub-agent JSONL the harness dropped under <session>/subagents/, sums the per-message usage numbers with the same convention mikko-skill-usage uses (input + output + cache-creation; cache-read excluded), dedupes by requestId, and prints either a JSON report or a human summary.
The slice is different from mikko-skill-usage:
| Skill | Slices by | Window | Output |
mikko-skill-usage | Skill name (one row per skill) | Last N days across the whole portfolio | Aggregate per-skill cost / cadence |
session-cost | Who spent it (main thread + per sub-agent) | One single session | What that one session cost end-to-end |
Use this when you want to retro a PR or a complex feature: "I spent this morning on the X task — what did it cost? Which sub-agent dispatch ate the most?"
When to use
- "What did this conversation cost so far?"
- "How much did running that complex feature take?"
- "Which of my parallel sub-agents was the most expensive?"
- "Compare the cost of two PRs I just shipped"
- Cost retro on a multi-hour pairing session
NOT for:
- Real-time monitoring. The JSONL is flushed at message end, sometimes later. Run the skill after a noticeable pause for accurate-feeling numbers.
- Cross-session aggregates. That's
mikko-skill-usage. - Pricing dollars. This counts tokens. Multiply by the model's per-token rate yourself if you want a dollar figure.
Procedure
1. Run the scanner
From inside any repo that has a Claude Code session history. The installer prefixes the skill name with mikko-, so the slash command is /mikko-session-cost and the installed scanner path is ~/.claude/skills/mikko-session-cost/scan.mjs. To call it directly from the library checkout instead, use the library-relative path:
node skills/session-cost/scan.mjsArgs:
--session <id>— explicit session ID (UUID-shaped, the bit before.jsonlin the transcript filename). Default: most-recently-modified session in the cwd-mapped project directory.--project-dir <path>— override the auto-resolved~/.claude/projects/<cwd-encoded>/path. Useful when you're measuring a session from a different repo than the one your cwd is in.--projects-dir <path>— override the default~/.claude/projects/root (useful for testing against a captured sample).--format json— emit the full structured report instead of the human summary. Pipe intojqfor further slicing.
The default project-dir resolution maps the current cwd to its harness-encoded directory under ~/.claude/projects/. If the auto-resolve misses (it's lenient but not perfect on Windows path edge cases), pass --project-dir explicitly.
2. Read the summary
The human summary has three sections:
=== Session 47fcb7d8… ===
Project: C:/Users/.../d--koodaamista-mikkonumminen-dev
Main thread: 830,258 tokens (157 assistant messages; 25,636,161 served from cache)
input: 331
output: 142,769
cache create: 687,158
Sub-agents: 352,937 tokens (13 agents, 56 assistant messages; 888,273 served from cache)
input: 82
output: 23,367
cache create: 329,488
TOTAL counted: 1,183,195 tokens
=== Per sub-agent (sorted by cost) ===
ae0ad8e7dd4e total= 41,897 msgs= 2 — Layout / arm's-length test
a20c28dc91d7 total= 38,620 msgs= 7 — Skill registry: AudiobookMaker
... etcThe "served from cache" number is informational — it's not counted, but a huge gap between "cache create" and "served from cache" tells you the session leaned heavily on prompt caching (good) vs paid for every prompt fresh (bad).
Per-sub-agent rows pick up the description from each agent's .meta.json sidecar, so you can tell which dispatch was which without having to remember agent IDs.
3. Done
Report the total + the most expensive sub-agent if any. No file is written by default; if you want to keep a snapshot, redirect --format json output to a file yourself.
Output schema (--format json)
{
session: string, // session UUID
project_dir: string, // resolved project directory
generated_at: string, // ISO 8601 UTC
main: { // main thread totals
in: number,
out: number,
cacheCreate: number,
cacheRead: number, // informational, NOT counted
msgs: number,
total: number, // = in + out + cacheCreate
skipped: number // malformed JSONL lines
},
sub_agents: [{
agentId: string,
description: string|null, // from agent-<id>.meta.json when present
in, out, cacheCreate, cacheRead, msgs, total, skipped
}],
sub_agent_totals: { same shape as main, no skipped },
total_counted: number // = main.total + sub_agent_totals.total
}Token accounting convention
Per-invocation tokens sum these usage fields across all assistant messages:
input_tokens— fresh input to the APIoutput_tokens— model outputcache_creation_input_tokens— input that becomes cache (paid once when written)
NOT summed:
cache_read_input_tokens— input served from cache (already paid for upstream; ~10× cheaper per token but not free; counting it would double-bill multi-turn runs)
Matches mikko-skill-usage's convention exactly. If a portfolio total from mikko-skill-usage and a sum of session-cost numbers ever disagree by more than rounding, one of them has a bug.
Sub-agent accounting
Sub-agent JSONL files live under <session-id>/subagents/agent-<id>.jsonl (with a sibling .meta.json carrying the description). The scanner walks them after the main JSONL and dedupes by requestId; if the harness ever logged a parent-thread assistant message and a sub-agent's first message with the same requestId, only one would count. Empirically the IDs don't collide, but the dedupe is defensive.
Token expectations
This is a pure JSONL parser. No model calls. No network. Cost: zero model tokens. Wall-clock: under a second for sessions under ~5MB of transcript.
Failure modes
~/.claude/projects/<cwd-encoded>/not found. The cwd → directory resolution missed. Pass--project-direxplicitly.- No
.jsonlfiles in the project dir. Either Claude Code has never run on this repo, or you're looking at the wrong project dir. - Malformed JSONL line. The scanner skips it, counts the skip, and continues. The summary doesn't surface the skip count today; pass
--format jsonand readmain.skippedif you want to know. - Session still being written. Run after the next message lands or after a pause; the last line of a being-written JSONL may be partial.
- Sub-agent
.meta.jsonmissing. The agent description shows as null. Doesn't affect token counts.
Limitations
- No outcome quality. Same caveat as
mikko-skill-usage: this counts tokens, not value. A 200K-token sub-agent that produced exactly the right answer is the same number as a 200K-token sub-agent that produced garbage. - No counterfactual. The "what would this have cost without parallel sub-agents?" question is unknowable — the scanner only sees what happened.
- No dollar figure. Counted tokens × per-token rate (model-dependent) is left to the reader. Different sub-agents may use different models (Sonnet vs Opus); the
.meta.jsonsidecar records this if you want to break out cost by model in a future revision.
Freshness check
Staleness checks run by /mikko-skills-freshness on any change to this skill — they assert the skill's load-bearing pieces still ship / stay documented. See that skill for the check vocabulary.
[[check]]
kind = "path_exists"
path = "scan.mjs"
[[check]]
kind = "command_exists"
command = "node"Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

