agentleFS
MetaMindTeamMetaMindTeam/ssot-kit/.claude/skills/new-feature/SKILL.md

new-feature

Skill1 starsChanged 4 months agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

Scaffold a new feature spec from the example, so implementation can start from an approved spec. Use when beginning any new feature. Takes a slug.

41 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use evidence-driven-testing, greploop-apps and 9 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • jaydubya818Skill

    evidence-driven-testing

    Capture observable runtime proof with video, screenshots, or measured output. Use when a change needs evidence beyond test reports.

    Also in 6 projects that use this

  • jaydubya818Skill

    greploop-apps

    Run greploop through @greptile-apps when the normal trigger rejects a large PR. Use only with the companion greploop skill.

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • VercelSkill

    before-and-after

    Add existing screenshots or screen recordings to a GitHub pull request as a before/after or preview block. Use when a PR needs visual media attached to its description. Browser navigation and capture belong to agent-browser.

    Also in 6 projects that use this

  • BboyfaroukSkill

    greploop

    Iteratively improves a PR until Greptile gives it a 5/5 confidence score with zero unresolved comments. Triggers Greptile review, fixes all actionable comments, pushes, re-triggers review, and repeats. Use when the user wants to fully optimize a PR against Greptile's code review standards.

    Also in 6 projects that use this

  • u9401066Skill

    bug-fix

    Structured bug fixing workflow with root cause analysis and regression prevention. Triggers: BF, 修 bug, fix bug, debug, 除錯, 錯誤, error, 問題, issue, 修復, fix, 故障, fault, 異常, exception, 失敗, failure, 不能用, broken, 壞掉.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • corygabrielsenSkill

    spike

    Implement N approaches as separate branches, then compare side-by-side. Removes "implementation effort" as a variable from the decision.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • +1 more from jaydubya818

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

3 rules. 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 39 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 1

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Follow the canon (spec/standards/spec_driven_standard.md, feature section).

    line 10
  2. Very specific:

    Fill it in: Write intent, requirements, definition_of_done, non_goals.

    line 14
  3. Distinctive:

    Then, and only then, implement: Test-first, to the Definition of Done.

    line 17

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 39 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

new-feature

Follow the canon (spec/standards/spec_driven_standard.md, feature section).

  1. Create the spec folder. Copy spec/features/_example/ to spec/features/<slug>/.
  2. Fill it in. Write intent, requirements, definition_of_done, non_goals. Link any invariants from spec/domain/invariants.yaml.
  3. Get it approved. Set status: approved only after review.
  4. Then, and only then, implement. Test-first, to the Definition of Done.

Invariant: no code without an approved spec.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.