agentleFS
Mathews-TomMathews-Tom/armory/skills/paper-to-skill/SKILL.md

paper-to-skill

Skill340 starsChanged 7 months agoMITView on GitHub

Converts research papers into executable skill packages via document conversion, critical analysis, and co-evolutionary refinement. Triggers on: "convert this paper to a skill", "paper-to-skill", "extract methodology from paper", "make a skill from this paper". NOT for literature review, use research-critique.

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

6 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈3

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 3

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Prefer the paper's own algorithm pseudocode over prose descriptions

    line 106
  2. Distinctive:

    If the paper describes multiple variants, extract the best-performing one

    line 109
  3. Distinctive:

    Ensure the generated skill properly attributes the source paper:

    line 133
  4. Very specific:

    Frontmatter: Add source: <paper_url> to the metadata

    line 135
  5. Very specific:

    References: If the paper has supplementary materials (code, datasets), create a source materials reference file in the generated skill's …

    line 146
  6. Very specific:

    Verify the skill name does not conflict with existing packages in manifest.yaml

    line 148

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 308,232 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Paper-to-Skill Pipeline

Transform research papers into production-grade skill packages. The pipeline extracts the actionable methodology from a paper, structures it as a skill specification, and feeds it through co-evolutionary refinement to produce a validated package.

This closes the loop between research and practice: a paper published today can become an executable skill tomorrow, without manual authoring.

Reference Files

FileContentsLoad When
references/extraction-patterns.mdPatterns for extracting methodology from papersAlways

Prerequisites

  • The to-markdown skill (for PDF/document conversion)
  • The research-critique skill (for paper analysis)
  • The test-engineer agent (for co-evolutionary skill generation)

Workflow

Phase 1: Paper Intake

Accept the paper in any supported format:

Input FormatAction
arXiv ID (e.g., 2604.01687)Fetch via https://arxiv.org/abs/<id>, convert PDF
arXiv URLExtract ID, fetch and convert
PDF file pathConvert using to-markdown skill
URL to paperFetch via WebFetch, convert if PDF
Pasted textUse directly

For PDF conversion, invoke the to-markdown skill:

Convert this PDF to clean markdown, preserving section structure, tables, equations, and algorithm pseudocode. Drop references section but keep inline citations.

Phase 2: Critical Analysis

Invoke the research-critique skill on the converted paper:

Analyze this paper focusing on:

  1. Core contribution: what is the novel methodology?
  2. Algorithm description: extract the step-by-step procedure
  3. Input/output specification: what goes in, what comes out?
  4. Key parameters and their valid ranges
  5. Claimed results and the evidence supporting them
  6. Failure modes and limitations acknowledged by the authors
  7. Prerequisites and dependencies (tools, data, compute)

The critique output becomes the foundation for the skill specification.

Phase 3: Skill Specification Extraction

From the critique output, build a structured skill specification:

specification:
  name: <kebab-case derived from paper's methodology name>
  domain: <paper's application domain>
  source_paper:
    title: <paper title>
    arxiv_id: <if available>
    url: <paper URL>
    authors: <first author et al.>
    date: <publication date>
  
  capabilities:
    - <capability 1 derived from the methodology>
    - <capability 2>
    - <capability 3>
  
  input_format: <what the skill accepts>
  output_format: <what the skill produces>
  
  algorithm_steps:
    - step: 1
      description: <from paper's algorithm>
      parameters: [<key params with ranges>]
    - step: 2
      description: <next step>
  
  failure_modes:
    - <from paper's limitations section>
  
  example_tasks:
    - <task 1 the methodology would solve>
    - <task 2>
    - <task 3>

Extraction rules:

  • Prefer the paper's own algorithm pseudocode over prose descriptions
  • Include parameter ranges from the paper's experiments (e.g., "learning rate: 0.001-0.01")
  • Map the paper's terminology to armory conventions (e.g., "module" → "skill", "pipeline" → "workflow")
  • If the paper describes multiple variants, extract the best-performing one

See references/extraction-patterns.md for patterns specific to common paper types.

Phase 4: Skill Generation

Hand off the specification to the test-engineer agent for co-evolutionary generation:

Evolve a skill for: [specification.domain]

Capabilities: [specification.capabilities] Algorithm: [specification.algorithm_steps] Input: [specification.input_format] Output: [specification.output_format] Failure modes: [specification.failure_modes] Example tasks: [specification.example_tasks]

Source: [specification.source_paper.title] ([specification.source_paper.url])

The test-engineer runs its full co-evolutionary loop (generate → verify → oracle → refine) using the specification as the task description.

Phase 5: Attribution and Finalization

Ensure the generated skill properly attributes the source paper:

  1. Frontmatter: Add source: <paper_url> to the metadata
  2. Body: Include an attribution section at the end of SKILL.md:
    ## Attribution
    
    This skill implements the methodology from:
    > <paper title>
    > <authors>
    > <venue/arxiv, date>
    > <URL>
  3. References: If the paper has supplementary materials (code, datasets), create a source materials reference file in the generated skill's references/ directory linking to them
  4. Verify the skill name does not conflict with existing packages in manifest.yaml

Output

The complete skill package at skills/<name>/:

  • SKILL.md with attribution and paper-derived workflow
  • evals/cases.yaml with assertions generated by the co-evolutionary loop
  • references/ with extraction patterns and source materials
  • evals/evolution-log.yaml from the test-engineer's refinement process

Error Handling

ErrorResolution
Paper has no clear algorithmExtract the methodology from the experiments section
Paper is purely theoreticalReport: no actionable methodology; suggest literature-review instead
PDF conversion failsTry alternative: fetch HTML version or request user paste text
Paper methodology requires data/computeNote in skill's prerequisites; skill may be a workflow template only
test-engineer budget exhaustedReturn best-scoring iteration with manual review warning

Limitations

  • Cannot extract visual methodologies (circuit diagrams, neural architecture figures) — works on textual algorithm descriptions only
  • Papers with multiple interdependent contributions may produce overly complex skills — consider splitting into multiple skills
  • Non-English papers require translation before processing
  • The generated skill's quality depends on the paper's clarity of methodology description

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.