agentleFS
Marwan-Ahmed-devMarwan-Ahmed-dev/vibecode-pro-max/.agents/skills/vc-debug/SKILL.md

vc:debug

Skill0 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub

Debug systematically with root-cause analysis before fixes. Use for bugs, test failures, unexpected behavior, performance issues, CI failures, or system investigation.

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

5 rules. About 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈5

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Code-level: Test failures, bugs, unexpected behavior, build failures, integration problems

    line 23
  2. Distinctive:

    Always: Before claiming work complete

    line 25
  3. Distinctive:

    Load when: After finding root cause, need comprehensive validation

    line 45
  4. Distinctive:

    Iron law: NO COMPLETION CLAIMS WITHOUT FRESH VERIFICATION EVIDENCE.

    line 49
  5. Distinctive:

    Stop and follow process if thinking:

    line 116

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 308,232 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Debugging & System Investigation

Comprehensive framework combining systematic debugging, root cause tracing, defense-in-depth validation, verification protocols, and system-level investigation (logs, CI/CD, databases, performance).

Core Principle

NO FIXES WITHOUT ROOT CAUSE INVESTIGATION FIRST

Random fixes waste time and create new bugs. Find root cause, fix at source, validate at every layer, verify before claiming success.

When to Use

Code-level: Test failures, bugs, unexpected behavior, build failures, integration problems System-level: Server errors, CI/CD pipeline failures, performance degradation, database issues, log analysis Always: Before claiming work complete

Techniques

1. Systematic Debugging (references/systematic-debugging.md)

Four-phase framework: Root Cause Investigation → Pattern Analysis → Hypothesis Testing → Implementation. Complete each phase before proceeding. No fixes without Phase 1.

Load when: Any bug/issue requiring investigation and fix

2. Root Cause Tracing (references/root-cause-tracing.md)

Trace bugs backward through call stack to find original trigger. Fix at source, not symptom. Includes scripts/find-polluter.sh for bisecting test pollution.

Load when: Error deep in call stack, unclear where invalid data originated

3. Defense-in-Depth (references/defense-in-depth.md)

Validate at every layer: Entry validation → Business logic → Environment guards → Debug instrumentation

Load when: After finding root cause, need comprehensive validation

4. Verification (references/verification.md)

Iron law: NO COMPLETION CLAIMS WITHOUT FRESH VERIFICATION EVIDENCE. Run command. Read output. Then claim result.

Load when: About to claim work complete, fixed, or passing

5. Investigation Methodology (references/investigation-methodology.md)

Five-step structured investigation for system-level issues: Initial Assessment → Data Collection → Analysis → Root Cause ID → Solution Development

Load when: Server incidents, system behavior analysis, multi-component failures

6. Log & CI/CD Analysis (references/log-and-ci-analysis.md)

Collect and analyze logs from servers, CI/CD pipelines (GitHub Actions), application layers. Tools: gh CLI, structured log queries, correlation across sources.

Load when: CI/CD pipeline failures, server errors, deployment issues

7. Performance Diagnostics (references/performance-diagnostics.md)

Identify bottlenecks, analyze query performance, develop optimization strategies. Covers database queries, API response times, resource utilization.

Load when: Performance degradation, slow queries, high latency, resource exhaustion

8. Reporting Standards (references/reporting-standards.md)

Structured diagnostic reports: Executive Summary → Technical Analysis → Recommendations → Evidence

Load when: Need to produce investigation report or diagnostic summary

9. Task Management (references/task-management-debugging.md)

Track investigation pipelines via Claude Native Tasks (TaskCreate, TaskUpdate, TaskList). Hydration pattern for multi-step investigations with dependency chains and parallel evidence collection. Fallback: Task tools are CLI-only — if unavailable (VSCode extension), use TodoWrite for tracking. Debug workflow remains fully functional.

Load when: Multi-component investigation (3+ steps), parallel log collection, coordinating debugger subagents

10. Frontend Verification (references/frontend-verification.md)

Visual verification of frontend implementations via Chrome MCP (Claude Chrome Extension) or vc:chrome-devtools skill fallback. Detect if frontend-related → check Chrome MCP availability → screenshot + console error check → report. Skip if not frontend.

Load when: Implementation touches frontend files (tsx/jsx/vue/svelte/html/css), UI bugs, visual regressions

Quick Reference

Code bug       → systematic-debugging.md (Phase 1-4)
  Deep in stack  → root-cause-tracing.md (trace backward)
  Found cause    → defense-in-depth.md (add layers)
  Claiming done  → verification.md (verify first)

System issue   → investigation-methodology.md (5 steps)
  CI/CD failure  → log-and-ci-analysis.md
  Slow system    → performance-diagnostics.md
  Need report    → reporting-standards.md

Frontend fix   → frontend-verification.md (Chrome/devtools)

Tools Integration

  • Database: sqlite3 CLI and drizzle-kit studio for SQLite/libSQL diagnostics
  • CI/CD: gh CLI for GitHub Actions logs and pipeline debugging
  • Codebase: vc:docs-seeker skill for package/plugin docs; vc:scout skill for codebase exploration
  • Scouting: /vc:scout or /vc:scout ext for finding relevant files
  • Frontend: Chrome browser or vc:chrome-devtools skill for visual verification (screenshots, console, network)
  • Skills: Activate vc:problem-solving skill when stuck on complex issues

Red Flags

Stop and follow process if thinking:

  • "Quick fix for now, investigate later"
  • "Just try changing X and see if it works"
  • "It's probably X, let me fix that"
  • "Should work now" / "Seems fixed"
  • "Tests pass, we're done"

All mean: Return to systematic process.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.