better-fullstack
Skill815 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub
Scaffold, plan, or extend Better Fullstack projects with the generator, CLI, or MCP server. Use when a user asks to create, generate, or scaffold a fullstack starter; choose a Better Fullstack stack; add Better Fullstack capabilities; compare agent scaffolding paths; or avoid hand-authoring boilerplate project files.
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
13 rules. About 0 are common, 7 are distinctive, and 6 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈7
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
6
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 8
Use the Better Fullstack generator as the source of truth for starter generation.
- Distinctive: line 12
Use an already-available CLI by default.
- Distinctive: line 16
Use a trusted Better Fullstack interface in this order:
- Distinctive: line 23
If none is available, ask the user for the command, service, tool, or docs source they want used.
- Very specific: line 29
Run it with --dry-run.
- Very specific: line 30
If the dry run succeeds, run the same command without --dry-run.
- Distinctive: line 31
If the CLI rejects a combination, adjust to the closest valid Better Fullstack stack and report the adjustment.
- Distinctive: line 35
Create exactly the requested project directory, using a relative project name.
- Very specific: line 36
Prefer create <project-name> --part ...
- Very specific: line 40
Use none explicitly for categories the user wants disabled.
- Distinctive: line 41
Do not start a dev server.
- Very specific: line 58
Use graph parts as category:ecosystem:option.
- Very specific: line 112
After explicit approval, pass the same absolute project path and exact unchanged token to bfs_apply_project_update with …
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 308,232 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Better Fullstack
Use the Better Fullstack generator as the source of truth for starter generation. Do not hand-write a full starter when a trusted Better Fullstack interface can produce it.
Choose The Path
Use an already-available CLI by default. The benchmarked best framing is: map the stack, dry-run the CLI, then run the same non-interactive command for real.
Use MCP only when the user explicitly asks for MCP, when CLI access is unavailable, or when the request needs structured schema lookup beyond what a concise CLI command can safely express. If using MCP, start with bfs_get_guidance, then use schema, compatibility, plan, and create/add tools in that order.
Use a trusted Better Fullstack interface in this order:
- A local CLI path provided by the prompt or current repository.
- A preinstalled Better Fullstack command available on
PATH. - An attached Better Fullstack MCP server or tool.
- A command explicitly provided or approved by the user.
If none is available, ask the user for the command, service, tool, or docs source they want used. Do not invent a bootstrap command.
Default CLI Workflow
- Map the user's stack into Better Fullstack graph parts and flat flags.
- Build one non-interactive command.
- Run it with
--dry-run. - If the dry run succeeds, run the same command without
--dry-run. - If the CLI rejects a combination, adjust to the closest valid Better Fullstack stack and report the adjustment.
CLI Rules
- Create exactly the requested project directory, using a relative project name.
- Prefer
create <project-name> --part ...for explicit or multi-ecosystem stacks. - Pass
--no-install --no-gitfor agent-driven scaffolding unless the user explicitly asks for side effects. - Pass
--package-manager bunwhen the user or project expects Bun. - Pass
--ai-docs agents-mdfor reusable projects, or--ai-docs nonefor benchmarks and throwaway scaffolds. - Use
noneexplicitly for categories the user wants disabled. - Do not start a dev server.
Mapping Hints
- React + Vite:
frontend:typescript:react-vite - Hono:
backend:typescript:hono - Bun runtime:
backend.runtime:typescript:bun - SQLite:
database:universal:sqlite - Drizzle:
backend.orm:typescript:drizzle - tRPC:
backend.api:typescript:trpc - Tailwind:
frontend.css:typescript:tailwind - DaisyUI:
frontend.ui:typescript:daisyui - Pino:
backend.logging:typescript:pino - Biome:
codeQuality:universal:biome
Graph Part Examples
Use graph parts as category:ecosystem:option.
<better-fullstack-cli> create my-app \
--part frontend:typescript:react-vite \
--part backend:typescript:hono \
--part database:universal:sqlite \
--part backend.runtime:typescript:bun \
--part backend.api:typescript:trpc \
--part backend.orm:typescript:drizzle \
--part frontend.css:typescript:tailwind \
--part frontend.ui:typescript:daisyui \
--part backend.logging:typescript:pino \
--part codeQuality:universal:biome \
--forms none \
--validation none \
--ai-docs none \
--package-manager bun \
--no-install \
--no-git<better-fullstack-cli> create api-app \
--part backend:python:fastapi \
--part database:universal:postgres \
--part backend.orm:python:sqlmodel \
--part backend.validation:python:pydantic \
--part backend.auth:python:jwt \
--part codeQuality:python:ruff \
--ai-docs agents-md \
--no-install \
--no-gitExisting Projects
For a generated project with bts.jsonc, use the Better Fullstack add command or MCP add tools. Use canonical Stack Part specs so each capability keeps its category and owner, for example:
<better-fullstack-cli> add --project-dir ./my-app --part staticAnalysis:typescript:knip --part workspaceRunner:universal:turborepo --no-installFor MCP lifecycle work, use this sequence:
bfs_get_project_statusreads configuration and manifest prerequisites without running toolchains or writing files.bfs_check_projectruns every generated target check. It requires installed dependencies and required toolchains; missing prerequisites are failures. It does not rewrite Better Fullstack source/configuration directly, though build tools may fetch dependencies and write locks, caches, compiler output, or build artifacts.bfs_plan_project_updatereads current-template drift. It returns areviewTokenonly when a supported manifest-v1 baseline exists and all exact structured-merge content fits the 32 KiB per-file MCP review bound. Oversized content is withheld with size/SHA metadata and no token.- After explicit approval, pass the same absolute project path and exact unchanged token to
bfs_apply_project_updatewithacknowledgeUnprovenManifestV1: true. Missing, stale, cross-project, or bounded-review-ineligible tokens fail closed. Apply destructively overwrites currently actionable template files and advances the v1 manifest without installing dependencies.
Manifest v1 does not prove generator release/SHA provenance or cross-version eligibility, and the current apply path has no transactional backup or automated recovery. Do not promise those Wave 1 guarantees.
Final Response
Report the command or tool path used, any compatibility adjustments, the project directory, and the next install/test/run commands. Do not claim dependencies are installed when --no-install or MCP creation skipped them.
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 1
- JustineDevs/CRUX★ 1same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository5 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- llms.txtllms.txt
- frontend-designSkill
- web-design-guidelinesSkill
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

