board
Skill1 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub
Renders the whole ticket queue with derived statuses — the board view of docs/tickets/. Works from git alone, on any hosting or none.
22 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- denormans/claude-code-workflowtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- eggs-gd/career-spacetheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- menot-you/n-soultheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- jayden-dang/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- AlexCiortan/setlisttheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- shipshitdev/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use validate.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
Microsoft AzureSkillvalidate
Run the full CI validation workflow locally before submitting a PR. Use this as a final check to ensure all Azure DevOps CI pipeline steps will pass.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions22 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 22
- OpenCoven/coven★ 75same name
- shipshitdev/skills★ 39same name
- Hassaan146/claude-skills★ 18same name
- Jinchen-Yang/diansai-skill★ 9same name
- markusbegerow/board-of-directors★ 5same name
- eggs-gd/career-space★ 4same name
- keefar/ticket-flow★ 4same name
- AlexCiortan/setlist★ 2same name
- csiddhant796-blip/claude-skills-collection★ 2same name
- Hussain-Elfalah/Agentic-Skills★ 2same name
12 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository10 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- autopilotSkill
- execute-ticketSkill
- next-ticketSkill
- planSkill
- ponytailSkill
- retroSkill
- shipSkill
- specSkill
- unblockSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
3 rules. 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 17 edited versions we read keep these.
1
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 13
Read every docs/tickets/[0-9]*.md on the current main.
- Very specific: line 24
If gh is available and the repo has a GitHub remote, annotate in-review rows with their PR number and CI state (gh pr list --head <branch>).
- Distinctive: line 42
Read-only: this skill never edits a ticket, never creates a branch, never merges.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 17 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Filter: $ARGUMENTS
Render the queue in docs/tickets/. Statuses are derived, never trusted from memory
— compute each one exactly as docs/tickets/README.md defines:
- Read every
docs/tickets/[0-9]*.mdon the current main. Parse frontmatter:id,title,role,depends,status. - List ticket branches:
git branch -a --list '*claude/*'(local and remote). - For each ticket, derive:
done— status isdonein mainneeds attention— its branch exists and the file in that branch (git show <branch>:docs/tickets/<file>) saysneeds-attentionin review— branch exists, file in branch saysdone, main still saystodoin progress— branch exists, file in branch still saystodoblocked— no branch, and some id independsis notdonein mainready— no branch, todo, all depends done
- If
ghis available and the repo has a GitHub remote, annotate in-review rows with their PR number and CI state (gh pr list --head <branch>). Skip silently otherwise — the board must render identically on GitLab or with no remote at all.
Output
One table, ordered by id, grouped by status in pipeline order: ready → in progress → in review → needs attention → blocked → done.
READY 003 Hacker News collector role:dev deps:1✓
IN REVIEW 007 LLM providers role:dev PR #31 CI:green
BLOCKED 019 Wiring waits on: 10, 12, 15End with one summary line: N done · N in flight · N ready · N blocked — and, if
anything sits at needs-attention, name it explicitly: those never clear on their own.
Read-only: this skill never edits a ticket, never creates a branch, never merges.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

