qa-run-triage
Skill0 starsChanged 18 days agoMITView on GitHub
Run Playwright tests at the narrowest useful scope when the user asks, record results into qa-kit history, and triage failures into app bug, test bug, environment/permission problem, or flaky test - with evidence, catalog updates, and bug reports grouped per feature. Use for "run the tests for X", "why did this fail", "is this flaky", or after any Playwright run.
In this repository5 other files it gives its agents.
- qa-automationSkill
- qa-explore-appSkill
- qa-memorySkill
- qa-playwright-authorSkill
- qa-test-casesSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
6 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈2
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
4
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 10
Do not start E2E runs on your own.
- Very specific: line 13
Prefer running through qa-kit: it picks the package script or Playwright project from the configured scopes (qa-kit config get e2e.scopes), …
- Very specific: line 26
Never set the env vars listed in e2e.protectedEnv (data-mutation or production switches), never change the target environment, never print …
- Distinctive: line 57
Never "fix" an app bug by weakening an assertion, adding skip/fixme, or copying the current wrong behaviour into the expectation.
- Very specific: line 65
Update the page catalog: Automation column (e.g.
- Very specific: line 77
If an earlier memory entry was wrong (e.g.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Run and triage
Running (only on request)
Do not start E2E runs on your own. When the user asks:
- Pick the narrowest scope: one page folder, or one case with
-g "<ID>". - Prefer running through qa-kit: it picks the package script or Playwright project from
the configured scopes (
qa-kit config get e2e.scopes), captures a JSON report, and updates history:
qa-kit run --dry-run -- e2e/billing/invoices # show the resolved command first
qa-kit run -- e2e/billing/invoices -g "INV-04" # script/project chosen from scopes
qa-kit run --script test:e2e:admin -- users # or name the package script
qa-kit run -- --project=chromium tests/checkout # or pass Playwright flags directlyAny other Playwright command also works; then record results with qa-kit ingest (the
Claude Code plugin does this automatically after the command).
3. Never set the env vars listed in e2e.protectedEnv (data-mutation or production
switches), never change the target environment, never print or copy credentials or
session files. If a test needs a switch the user has not set, report that it was
skipped and why.
4. A new or changed spec runs twice; both results must match.
Read what happened
qa-kit history --filter failing # current failures with last error
qa-kit history --filter flaky # status flips over the last runs (p F ~ s)
qa-kit memory search "<test ID or page>" --kind bug
qa-kit cases --id <ID> # expectation, known issue, catalog findingFor each failure open the error and the screenshot/trace in the project's output dir
(qa-kit config get e2e.outputDir; error-context.md holds the error and an accessibility
snapshot).
Classify (decide before changing anything)
| Evidence | Class | Action |
| Backend rejected the UI's request (4xx with validation errors) and the payload differs from the API contract | App bug | Keep test failing, annotate, add finding, report |
| UI differs from the requirement (missing control, wrong text, wrong rule) | App bug | Same as above |
| Locator not found after an intended UI change; test assumed wrong data | Test bug | Fix the test; save a selector/gotcha lesson |
| Redirect / access denied / missing menu for the test account | Permission / environment | Not an app bug; note role + environment in memory (data or gotcha) |
| Timeouts on first test, server not ready, login/session conflicts | Environment | Re-run once; save a gotcha if it repeats |
| Passes on re-run without changes; history shows flips | Flaky | Find the timing/data dependency and fix it; record a flaky lesson with the cause |
| Already listed as a known issue in the catalog / memory | Known bug | Do not re-report; confirm it still fails |
Never "fix" an app bug by weakening an assertion, adding skip/fixme, or copying the current wrong behaviour into the expectation.
Report
- Group confirmed app bugs per feature, not per test: test IDs, run command, environment and role (no passwords), expected vs actual, evidence path. Use a tracker MCP if the user wants it filed, otherwise give a ready-to-paste report.
- Update the page catalog: Automation column (e.g.
failing: bug, in the catalog's language) and Findings with run date and environment.
Learn (mandatory)
qa-kit memory add --kind bug --scope <page dir> "<IDs>: <bug>, confirmed <date> on <env>, issue <ID>"
qa-kit memory add --kind flaky --scope <page dir> "<ID> flips because <cause>; fixed by <change>"
qa-kit memory add --kind gotcha "<environment lesson for this app>"
qa-kit memory add --global --kind gotcha "<lesson true for every app, e.g. a Playwright behaviour>"If an earlier memory entry was wrong (e.g. a "bug" that was a permission problem), retire it:
qa-kit memory forget <ID> --reason "<why>" or add the corrected entry with
--supersedes <ID>.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

