release-archivist
Skill875 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub
Close out a spec-superflow change with verification, summary, and archive readiness. Invoke when implementation is complete, verification is underway, or the user asks for a final wrap-up.
In this repository11 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- .github/copilot-instructions.mdCopilot instructions
- llms.txtllms.txt
- bug-investigatorSkill
- build-executorSkill
- code-reviewerSkill
- contract-builderSkill
- need-explorerSkill
- spec-mergerSkill
- spec-writerSkill
- workflow-startSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
2 rules. About 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈0
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 10
Before executing a CLI line below, replace its leading SSF with node "<plugin-root>/scripts/spec-superflow.mjs".
- Very specific: line 16
Read SSF resume <change-dir> --json.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Release Archivist
Bundled runtime
Before executing a CLI line below, replace its leading SSF with node "<plugin-root>/scripts/spec-superflow.mjs"; <plugin-root> is the absolute directory two levels above this file. Never run SSF literally or call an ssf from PATH.
Workflow routing
A new request follows this file without loading legacy instructions. For an existing change, inspect the recorded state and receipt/plan (available through SSF workflow show <change-dir> --json and SSF execution show <dir> --json when needed). Current paths are workflow_variant: direct with a valid workflow-selection receipt schema_version: 3, or workflow_variant: planned with an execution plan schema_version: 2. Older receipts (schema 1/2), legacy plans and other recorded variants use the matching section of SSF runtime asset read docs/legacy-workflow.md; follow that section for this change. A direct variant alone is insufficient: legacy Quick/Hotfix/Lightweight can also record it. The internal workflow: full value alone is not a legacy signal. Missing or corrupt state, receipt or a required plan is a recovery problem; preserve evidence rather than reinitialize or downgrade the change.
Read SSF resume <change-dir> --json. In executing, complete verification and logical closure. In closing, perform only recorded pending physical finish, if merging is authorized. abandoned or a completed finish requires no work. Other states route through workflow-start.
New direct/planned changes
Use SSF workflow complete <dir> --verification-command "<required check command>". It runs final verification once; do not run the identical full suite immediately before invoking it. Planned execution additionally checks completed tasks, current full-range/wave review and any delta-spec publication. Direct execution needs no plan or review receipt. Ordinary failures stay in executing for focused repair. Reuse authorization already covering code delivery.
If the user explicitly accepts unfinished work or failed verification, use SSF workflow complete <dir> --accept-risk --confirm --reason "<decision and remaining issues>". Preserve every failure and report accepted-risk, not verified success. This ends code delivery without merging or deleting the branch. A plain closing transition cannot bypass failed checks. For verified work, physical integration remains a separate authorized operation.
Physical finish and delivery
Logical closure does not claim merge or cleanup succeeded. For verified changes with recorded isolation and authorized integration, use SSF finish <dir> [--test-cmd <command>]. It verifies the recorded target and preserves isolation on failure. Cleanup failure remains cleanup-pending. Resume only the recorded pending operation; do not guess the target or reopen completed work.
For branch delivery, leave the branch/worktree intact. Report outcome, key verification, unresolved risks and integration status. Logical closure does not authorize merge, push or release; accepted-risk delivery is not eligible for physical integration.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

