agentleFS
MKAbuMattarMKAbuMattar/skills/qa/SKILL.md

qa

Skill1 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub

Run an interactive QA session — the user describes bugs and issues conversationally, you ask brief clarifying questions, explore the codebase for domain context, decide whether to file one issue or break it down, and create durable user-focused GitHub issues via `gh issue create` — without referencing internal file paths or line numbers. Use this skill whenever the user wants to do QA, report bugs, file issues, walk through a list of problems, or hits you with phrases like "let's do a QA session", "I found a bug", "this is broken", "file this as an issue", "I have a few things to report", or "let's go through these one by one". Also use when the user is reviewing a deployed feature and wants to track defects.

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

16 rules. About 0 are common, 12 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈12

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 4

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    If the description is already clear enough to file, move on without asking.

    line 53
  2. Distinctive:

    Keep as a single issue: when:

    line 73
  3. Distinctive:

    All the symptoms are caused by the same root behavior.

    line 76
  4. Very specific:

    When breaking down: prefer many thin issues over few thick ones, mark blocking relationships honestly, create issues in dependency order so …

    line 78
  5. Distinctive:

    Use the templates verbatim:

    line 82
  6. Distinctive:

    Do not: ask the user to review before filing.

    line 87
  7. Distinctive:

    After filing, print all issue URLs (with blocking relationships summarized) and ask: "Next issue, or are we done?" Loop until the user says …

    line 91
  8. Very specific:

    Use the project's domain language: Read UBIQUITOUS_LANGUAGE.md if present.

    line 101
  9. Distinctive:

    Reproduction steps are mandatory: If you can't derive them from the description, ask one targeted question.

    line 104
  10. Distinctive:

    Each issue is independent — file as you go: Don't batch them up at the end.

    line 105
  11. Very specific:

    Read UBIQUITOUS_LANGUAGE.md (if it exists) before writing the issue body.

    line 114
  12. Distinctive:

    Use the bundled templates verbatim — fill the placeholders with domain-language descriptions.

    line 116
  13. Very specific:

    Run gh issue create --title "..." --body-file <path> directly.

    line 118
  14. Distinctive:

    After each filing, print URLs + a one-line blocking summary, then ask "Next issue, or are we done?"

    line 119
  15. Distinctive:

    Ask the user to approve the issue body before filing.

    line 125
  16. Distinctive:

    Use module / internal naming when domain naming exists.

    line 128

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

QA

Interactive QA: capture bugs into durable, user-focused GitHub issues — fast, parallel-friendly, and free of internal file/line references.

When to use

  • The user wants to report bugs, do a QA pass, or walk through a list of defects.
  • The user opens with phrases like "let's do a QA session", "I found a bug", "this is broken", "file this", "a few things to report", or "let's go through these".
  • The user is reviewing a deployed feature and wants the issues tracked.

The session loop

For each issue the user raises, run these steps. Each issue is independent — don't batch.

1. Listen and lightly clarify

Let the user describe the problem in their own words. Ask at most 2–3 short clarifying questions, focused on:

  • Expected vs actual behavior
  • Steps to reproduce (if not obvious)
  • Consistent vs intermittent

If the description is already clear enough to file, move on without asking. Don't over-interview.

2. Explore the codebase in the background

While talking to the user, spawn a background Explore subagent (subagent_type=Explore) for the relevant area. The goal is context for the issue body, not a fix:

  • Learn the domain language used in that area. Read UBIQUITOUS_LANGUAGE.md if present.
  • Understand what the feature is supposed to do.
  • Identify the user-facing behavior boundary.

The issue itself must not reference specific files, line numbers, or internal implementation details — that exploration only sharpens your wording.

3. Decide: single issue or breakdown

Break down when:

  • The fix spans multiple independent areas (form validation is wrong AND success message is missing AND redirect is broken).
  • There are clearly separable concerns different people could work on in parallel.
  • The user describes multiple distinct failure modes or symptoms.

Keep as a single issue when:

  • It's one behavior that's wrong in one place.
  • All the symptoms are caused by the same root behavior.

When breaking down: prefer many thin issues over few thick ones, mark blocking relationships honestly, create issues in dependency order so Blocked by #N can use real numbers, and maximize parallelism.

4. File the issue(s) with gh issue create

Use the templates verbatim:

  • Single issue → fill in assets/templates/single-issue.template.md, then gh issue create --title "..." --body-file <filled.md>.
  • Breakdown → for each slice, fill in assets/templates/breakdown-subissue.template.md. Create blockers first so dependent issues can cite real numbers.

Do not ask the user to review before filing. File and share the URLs.

5. Continue

After filing, print all issue URLs (with blocking relationships summarized) and ask: "Next issue, or are we done?" Loop until the user says they're done.

Available resources

  • assets/templates/single-issue.template.md — body template for a single issue. Use verbatim, fill placeholders.
  • assets/templates/breakdown-subissue.template.md — body template for one slice of a broken-down report.

Top gotchas (always inline — do not skip)

  • No file paths, function names, or line numbers in issue bodies. Issues outlive refactors. Describe user-facing behavior, not code.
  • Use the project's domain language. Read UBIQUITOUS_LANGUAGE.md if present. "The sync service fails to apply the patch" — not applyPatch() throws on line 42.
  • Don't over-interview. Two or three short questions, then file.
  • Don't ask for approval before filing. File and share the URL — that's the whole point of "fast QA".
  • Reproduction steps are mandatory. If you can't derive them from the description, ask one targeted question.
  • Each issue is independent — file as you go. Don't batch them up at the end.
  • Issue bodies should read in 30 seconds. A developer should grok the problem fast.
  • Every Blocked by must reference a real issue number. That's why you create blockers first.
  • Don't try to fix the bug. This skill is for capturing defects. The fix is somebody else's (or a follow-up) job.

What you DO

  1. Listen first; ask 2–3 short clarifying questions max; file fast.
  2. Spawn an Explore subagent in the background to learn domain language while you talk to the user.
  3. Read UBIQUITOUS_LANGUAGE.md (if it exists) before writing the issue body.
  4. Decide single-vs-breakdown based on whether the fix has independent slices.
  5. Use the bundled templates verbatim — fill the placeholders with domain-language descriptions.
  6. File issues in dependency order so Blocked by can cite real numbers.
  7. Run gh issue create --title "..." --body-file <path> directly. Don't ask for review.
  8. After each filing, print URLs + a one-line blocking summary, then ask "Next issue, or are we done?"

What you do NOT do

  • Cite file paths, function names, or line numbers in issue bodies.
  • Over-interview the user with more than 2–3 short questions.
  • Ask the user to approve the issue body before filing.
  • Batch issues — file one at a time as the user reports them.
  • Try to fix the bug. Capture, don't repair.
  • Use module / internal naming when domain naming exists.
  • File without reproduction steps.
  • Mix multiple separable problems into one issue.
  • Reference your codebase exploration in the issue body — it informs your wording, not the issue text.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.