qa
Skill1 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub
Run an interactive QA session — the user describes bugs and issues conversationally, you ask brief clarifying questions, explore the codebase for domain context, decide whether to file one issue or break it down, and create durable user-focused GitHub issues via `gh issue create` — without referencing internal file paths or line numbers. Use this skill whenever the user wants to do QA, report bugs, file issues, walk through a list of problems, or hits you with phrases like "let's do a QA session", "I found a bug", "this is broken", "file this as an issue", "I have a few things to report", or "let's go through these one by one". Also use when the user is reviewing a deployed feature and wants to track defects.
In this repository24 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- architecture-auditSkill
- autodreamSkill
- deep-discoverySkill
- generic-by-designSkill
- gitops-cd-developerSkill
- gitops-pipeline-developerSkill
- golang-script-developerSkill
- humanizerSkill
- information-architectureSkill
- interactive-deck-builderSkill
- javascript-script-developerSkill
- linux-script-developerSkill
- makefile-script-developerSkill
- plan-interviewSkill
- pre-commit-setupSkill
- python-script-developerSkill
- skill-builderSkill
- teacher-modeSkill
- terraform-module-developerSkill
- typescript-script-developerSkill
- ui-deslopSkill
- xquik-x-dataSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
16 rules. About 0 are common, 12 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈12
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
4
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 53
If the description is already clear enough to file, move on without asking.
- Distinctive: line 73
Keep as a single issue: when:
- Distinctive: line 76
All the symptoms are caused by the same root behavior.
- Very specific: line 78
When breaking down: prefer many thin issues over few thick ones, mark blocking relationships honestly, create issues in dependency order so …
- Distinctive: line 82
Use the templates verbatim:
- Distinctive: line 87
Do not: ask the user to review before filing.
- Distinctive: line 91
After filing, print all issue URLs (with blocking relationships summarized) and ask: "Next issue, or are we done?" Loop until the user says …
- Very specific: line 101
Use the project's domain language: Read UBIQUITOUS_LANGUAGE.md if present.
- Distinctive: line 104
Reproduction steps are mandatory: If you can't derive them from the description, ask one targeted question.
- Distinctive: line 105
Each issue is independent — file as you go: Don't batch them up at the end.
- Very specific: line 114
Read UBIQUITOUS_LANGUAGE.md (if it exists) before writing the issue body.
- Distinctive: line 116
Use the bundled templates verbatim — fill the placeholders with domain-language descriptions.
- Very specific: line 118
Run gh issue create --title "..." --body-file <path> directly.
- Distinctive: line 119
After each filing, print URLs + a one-line blocking summary, then ask "Next issue, or are we done?"
- Distinctive: line 125
Ask the user to approve the issue body before filing.
- Distinctive: line 128
Use module / internal naming when domain naming exists.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
QA
Interactive QA: capture bugs into durable, user-focused GitHub issues — fast, parallel-friendly, and free of internal file/line references.
When to use
- The user wants to report bugs, do a QA pass, or walk through a list of defects.
- The user opens with phrases like "let's do a QA session", "I found a bug", "this is broken", "file this", "a few things to report", or "let's go through these".
- The user is reviewing a deployed feature and wants the issues tracked.
The session loop
For each issue the user raises, run these steps. Each issue is independent — don't batch.
1. Listen and lightly clarify
Let the user describe the problem in their own words. Ask at most 2–3 short clarifying questions, focused on:
- Expected vs actual behavior
- Steps to reproduce (if not obvious)
- Consistent vs intermittent
If the description is already clear enough to file, move on without asking. Don't over-interview.
2. Explore the codebase in the background
While talking to the user, spawn a background Explore subagent (subagent_type=Explore) for the relevant area. The goal is context for the issue body, not a fix:
- Learn the domain language used in that area. Read
UBIQUITOUS_LANGUAGE.mdif present. - Understand what the feature is supposed to do.
- Identify the user-facing behavior boundary.
The issue itself must not reference specific files, line numbers, or internal implementation details — that exploration only sharpens your wording.
3. Decide: single issue or breakdown
Break down when:
- The fix spans multiple independent areas (
form validation is wrong AND success message is missing AND redirect is broken). - There are clearly separable concerns different people could work on in parallel.
- The user describes multiple distinct failure modes or symptoms.
Keep as a single issue when:
- It's one behavior that's wrong in one place.
- All the symptoms are caused by the same root behavior.
When breaking down: prefer many thin issues over few thick ones, mark blocking relationships honestly, create issues in dependency order so Blocked by #N can use real numbers, and maximize parallelism.
4. File the issue(s) with gh issue create
Use the templates verbatim:
- Single issue → fill in
assets/templates/single-issue.template.md, thengh issue create --title "..." --body-file <filled.md>. - Breakdown → for each slice, fill in
assets/templates/breakdown-subissue.template.md. Create blockers first so dependent issues can cite real numbers.
Do not ask the user to review before filing. File and share the URLs.
5. Continue
After filing, print all issue URLs (with blocking relationships summarized) and ask: "Next issue, or are we done?" Loop until the user says they're done.
Available resources
assets/templates/single-issue.template.md— body template for a single issue. Use verbatim, fill placeholders.assets/templates/breakdown-subissue.template.md— body template for one slice of a broken-down report.
Top gotchas (always inline — do not skip)
- No file paths, function names, or line numbers in issue bodies. Issues outlive refactors. Describe user-facing behavior, not code.
- Use the project's domain language. Read
UBIQUITOUS_LANGUAGE.mdif present. "The sync service fails to apply the patch" — notapplyPatch() throws on line 42. - Don't over-interview. Two or three short questions, then file.
- Don't ask for approval before filing. File and share the URL — that's the whole point of "fast QA".
- Reproduction steps are mandatory. If you can't derive them from the description, ask one targeted question.
- Each issue is independent — file as you go. Don't batch them up at the end.
- Issue bodies should read in 30 seconds. A developer should grok the problem fast.
- Every
Blocked bymust reference a real issue number. That's why you create blockers first. - Don't try to fix the bug. This skill is for capturing defects. The fix is somebody else's (or a follow-up) job.
What you DO
- Listen first; ask 2–3 short clarifying questions max; file fast.
- Spawn an
Exploresubagent in the background to learn domain language while you talk to the user. - Read
UBIQUITOUS_LANGUAGE.md(if it exists) before writing the issue body. - Decide single-vs-breakdown based on whether the fix has independent slices.
- Use the bundled templates verbatim — fill the placeholders with domain-language descriptions.
- File issues in dependency order so
Blocked bycan cite real numbers. - Run
gh issue create --title "..." --body-file <path>directly. Don't ask for review. - After each filing, print URLs + a one-line blocking summary, then ask "Next issue, or are we done?"
What you do NOT do
- Cite file paths, function names, or line numbers in issue bodies.
- Over-interview the user with more than 2–3 short questions.
- Ask the user to approve the issue body before filing.
- Batch issues — file one at a time as the user reports them.
- Try to fix the bug. Capture, don't repair.
- Use module / internal naming when domain naming exists.
- File without reproduction steps.
- Mix multiple separable problems into one issue.
- Reference your codebase exploration in the issue body — it informs your wording, not the issue text.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

