microsoft-agentic-harness
CLAUDE.md18 starsChanged 7 months agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Key architectural concepts from the reference: - Skills System: Multi-skill agents with prerequisite ordering, dual mode (Managed/Injected), plugin-sourced skills - Plugin System: Local plugin declarations with manifest reading, skill + MCP server wiring, boundary governance (AllowedTools/DeniedTools/AutonomyLevel) - Tool Output Compression: MediatR pipeline behavior with content-type detection and strategy-specific compression - Keyed DI Tools: Tools registered with string keys ("file_system", "calculation_engine") for lazy resolution from skill declarations - Agent Manifest (AGENT.md): Declarative agent config with tool declarations, state config, decision frameworks…
- Installs packages
In this repository9 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- pre-push-reviewSkill
- dashboard-agentSkill
- default-agentSkill
- echo-testSkill
- harness-proposerSkill
- orchestrator-agentSkill
- research-agentSkill
- skill-optimizerSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this CLAUDE.md into the rules it gives an agent
16 rules. About 0 are common, 8 are distinctive, and 8 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈8
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
8
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 54
After changes: build, then test (commands above).
- Very specific: line 64
Check reference implementation at C:\CodeRepos\ApplicationTemplate for existing patterns before creating new abstractions
- Distinctive: line 67
Run build + tests after each meaningful change
- Distinctive: line 75
When the reference is silent on a problem, design the best answer.
- Distinctive: line 76
Every public type ships with full XML docs (already a rule) — same reasoning.
- Very specific: line 82
Never re-check conversation ownership at a call site.
- Distinctive: line 85
When one result type means two things, return a distinct type, not a better field → correctness-review-rubric
- Distinctive: line 90
Before changing a shared object, read what each real consumer does with it → correctness-review-rubric
- Very specific: line 108
MUST run impact analysis before editing any symbol: Before modifying a function, class, or method, run impact({target: "symbolName", …
- Distinctive: line 110
MUST warn the user: if impact analysis returns HIGH or CRITICAL risk before proceeding with edits.
- Very specific: line 111
When exploring unfamiliar code, use query({search_query: "concept"}) to find execution flows instead of grepping.
- Very specific: line 112
When you need full context on a specific symbol — callers, callees, which execution flows it participates in — use context({name: …
- Very specific: line 117
NEVER edit a function, class, or method without first running impact on it.
- Distinctive: line 118
NEVER ignore HIGH or CRITICAL risk warnings from impact analysis.
- Very specific: line 119
NEVER rename symbols with find-and-replace — use rename which understands the call graph.
- Very specific: line 120
NEVER commit changes without running detect_changes() to check affected scope.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 26,980 CLAUDE.md files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Project: Microsoft Agentic Harness
Purpose
Production-grade template for a Microsoft Agent Framework agent with a full agentic harness — multi-skill agents, local plugins, MCP, tools, RAG, and knowledge graph systems — modeled after Claude Code's architecture. Built on the ApplicationTemplate Clean Architecture pattern. Designed for enterprise consumers to clone and extend.
Stack
- C# .NET 10, Clean Architecture, CQRS/MediatR, FluentValidation, AutoMapper
- Microsoft.Agents.AI, Microsoft.Extensions.AI, OpenAI SDK (Azure OpenAI runs on its
/openai/v1/route) - MCP (Model Context Protocol) server/client — HTTP transport with JWT auth
- EF Core with SQLite (plan state persistence), IDbContextFactory for short-lived contexts
- Docker.DotNet (container sandbox)
- RAG: Azure AI Search, FAISS, SQLite FTS5, ManagedCode.GraphRag
- Knowledge Graph: Neo4j, Kuzu, PostgreSQL, Leiden community detection
- Governance: Polly (resilience), EWMA drift detection, JSONL audit stores
- OpenTelemetry (Grafana + Tempo + Prometheus + Azure Monitor)
- xUnit, Moq, coverlet
Architecture
Clean Architecture with Domain → Application → Infrastructure → Presentation layers.
Reference implementation: C:\CodeRepos\ApplicationTemplate (same layer structure, DI patterns, and conventions).
Key architectural concepts from the reference:
- Skills System: Multi-skill agents with prerequisite ordering, dual mode (Managed/Injected), plugin-sourced skills
- Plugin System: Local plugin declarations with manifest reading, skill + MCP server wiring, boundary governance (AllowedTools/DeniedTools/AutonomyLevel)
- Tool Output Compression: MediatR pipeline behavior with content-type detection and strategy-specific compression
- Keyed DI Tools: Tools registered with string keys (
"file_system","calculation_engine") for lazy resolution from skill declarations - Agent Manifest (AGENT.md): Declarative agent config with tool declarations, state config, decision frameworks
- MCP Server: ASP.NET Core WebAPI exposing tools/prompts/resources via MCP protocol
- Factory Pattern: AgentFactory, ChatClientFactory, AgentExecutionContextFactory for consistent agent construction
- MediatR Pipeline: validation, authorization, idempotency, caching, tracing and timeout from
Application.Common, then the AI behaviors (unhandled-exception safety net, content safety, token budget, tool output compression and others) fromApplication.AI.Common, in registration order - DAG Plan Execution: PlanExecutor orchestrates PlanGraph with bounded concurrency, checkpoint/resume via EfCorePlanStateStore, error recovery (retry/escalate/skip)
- Sandbox Isolation: ProcessSandboxExecutor (Job Objects) and DockerSandboxExecutor with HMAC attestation. Closed-by-default capability model
- Step Executors: Keyed DI by StepType enum — LlmCall, ToolUse, HumanGate, ConditionalBranch, SubPlanInvocation
- Partial Class Pattern: Large files split into partials by responsibility (PlanExecutor.Scheduling.cs, PlanExecutor.Recovery.cs, etc.)
- Skill Training Loop:
TrainSkillCommandHandlerchains the 6 stages on the same call stack (no MediatR re-entrance inner-loop); epoch-boundary mechanisms (SlowUpdate, MetaSkillUpdate) are separate CQRS commands dispatched viaIMediatorso they get the standard pipeline (validation, audit, telemetry)
Documentation
- Developer Onboarding Guide:
documentation/onboarding/— 19-chapter guide for engineers (deployed at/). Chapter 19, the Incident Ledger, holds everyINC-NNbelow. Chapter 17 is the Execution API integration guide (bundles, workflows, tool discovery); its OpenAPI spec isdocumentation/onboarding/assets/openapi/bundle-api.yaml(filename kept deliberately — it is a published URL) (hand-written; to change the contract, follow Change the wire contract insrc/Content/Presentation/Presentation.ExecutionApi/README.md) - Architecture Guide:
documentation/architecture/— Azure infrastructure playbook (deployed at/architecture/) - Security Guide:
documentation/security/— threat model, governance, sandbox, egress/SSRF, content safety, OWASP Agentic evals (deployed at/security/) - Interactive Course:
documentation/agentic-harness-course/— Visual course for non-technical audiences (deployed at/agentic-harness-course/) - Reference Catalogue:
documentation/reference/— patterns & technologies reference (deployed at/reference/) - Additional design specs live in
documentation/design/anddocumentation/blueprints/(markdown, not deployed) - Capability Showcase:
documentation/showcase/— interactive architecture showcase (deployed at/showcase/) - GitHub Pages workflow:
.github/workflows/pages.yml— deploys all six sites on push to main
Commands
dotnet build src/AgenticHarness.slnx— Builddotnet test src/AgenticHarness.slnx— Run all testsdotnet test --collect:"XPlat Code Coverage"— Tests with coveragedotnet run --project src/Content/Presentation/Presentation.ConsoleUI— Run console
Verification
After changes: build, then test (commands above).
Code Style
- Immutability: records,
withexpressions,ImmutableList<T>, init-only properties - PascalCase (classes/methods/props),
_camelCase(private fields), camelCase (locals/params) - Functions <50 lines, no nesting >4 levels
- Result
<T>pattern for error handling, structured logging (no console.log) - FluentValidation on all DTOs, validate at system boundaries
Task Approach
- Check reference implementation at
C:\CodeRepos\ApplicationTemplatefor existing patterns before creating new abstractions - Present options when trade-offs exist between agent framework approaches
- Implement in layers: Domain models first, Application interfaces, Infrastructure implementations, Presentation last
- Run build + tests after each meaningful change
- Flag anything that diverges from the ApplicationTemplate patterns
Quality Bar
This is a production template that enterprise consumers will clone. Corners cut now propagate to every downstream consumer. The global "Optimize for Best Outcome, Not Speed" rule applies with extra weight here:
- Match or exceed the reference implementation on patterns, abstractions, and rigor. Never ship something here that you'd reject when reviewing the reference.
- When the reference is silent on a problem, design the best answer; do not invent a smaller answer just because the reference didn't address it.
- Every public type ships with full XML docs (already a rule) — same reasoning. Consumers are reading this as teaching material.
Standing rules
Each arrow names the enforcing test, the review rubric, or the ledger entry. Subsystem rules: .claude/rules/*.md. check-claude-md-budget.mjs caps this file at 12,288 bytes and checks every arrow.
- A request carrying user text must implement
IContentScreenable;ContentSafetyBehaviorscreens nothing else → INC-05 AIContextProvider.ProvideAIContextAsyncis additive: subtract or rewrite inInvokingCoreAsync; test viaInvokingAsync→ AIContextProviderMergeContractTests- Never re-check conversation ownership at a call site; pass
callerIdand letIConversationStorerefuse (a mock refuses nothing) → INC-18 - Retry, breaker and fallback decide via
IProviderErrorClassifier, never exception type; 429/5xx stay transient → DefaultProviderErrorClassifierTests - An authenticated request gets a knowledge scope or is rejected (null = GLOBAL); identity only via
GetUserIdOrNull()→ CallerIdentityResolutionBoundaryTests - When one result type means two things, return a distinct type, not a better field → correctness-review-rubric
- A fix to one occurrence of a repeated pattern is not done until every sibling has it → correctness-review-rubric
- A new enum member updates every hand-kept "all values" list; pin each with a test → DefaultValues_MatchEveryRedactionCategoryEnumMember
- Close a check at the pipeline's true final exit, not after the nearest filter → correctness-review-rubric
- Nothing built inside the
ILoggerFactory(or any core) factory takesILogger<T>; sweep after core DI changes → ValidateOnBuildSweepTests - Before changing a shared object, read what each real consumer does with it → correctness-review-rubric
- A control counts only if a host invokes it: name the line whose deletion removes it and the test that then fails → SecurityControlHasACallerTests
- Narrowing a check: also test the other direction (no new false negative) against a real producer's wire shape → correctness-review-rubric
- Per-caller MCP credentials need caller identity in
McpConnectionManager's cache keys → SharedCaches_AreKeyedByServerNameOnly - Arm child governance only via
GovernanceArmer(a preset;OpenChildfor child scopes), never a hand copy → GovernanceArmerTests - Publish ambient state around every step of an async iterator, not once; re-assert attribution via
ReassertAttribution()→ AttributionIsPublishedByTheExecutionContextOnlyTests - Package skew: pin the transitive package in
Presentation.Common.csprojor list it inKnownHostSkewswith a reason → PackageSkewTests
<!-- gitnexus:start -->GitNexus — Code Intelligence
This project is indexed by GitNexus as microsoft-agentic-harness. Use the GitNexus MCP tools to understand code, assess impact, and navigate safely.
Index stale? Run
node .gitnexus/run.cjs analyzefrom the project root — it auto-selects an available runner. No.gitnexus/run.cjsyet?npx gitnexus analyze(npm 11 crash →npm i -g gitnexus; #1939).
Always Do
- MUST run impact analysis before editing any symbol. Before modifying a function, class, or method, run
impact({target: "symbolName", direction: "upstream"})and report the blast radius (direct callers, affected processes, risk level) to the user. - MUST run
detect_changes()before committing to verify your changes only affect expected symbols and execution flows. For regression review, compare against the default branch:detect_changes({scope: "compare", base_ref: "main"}). - MUST warn the user if impact analysis returns HIGH or CRITICAL risk before proceeding with edits.
- When exploring unfamiliar code, use
query({search_query: "concept"})to find execution flows instead of grepping. It returns process-grouped results ranked by relevance. - When you need full context on a specific symbol — callers, callees, which execution flows it participates in — use
context({name: "symbolName"}). - For security review,
explain({target: "fileOrSymbol"})lists taint findings (source→sink flows; needsanalyze --pdg).
Never Do
- NEVER edit a function, class, or method without first running
impacton it. - NEVER ignore HIGH or CRITICAL risk warnings from impact analysis.
- NEVER rename symbols with find-and-replace — use
renamewhich understands the call graph. - NEVER commit changes without running
detect_changes()to check affected scope.
Resources
| Resource | Use for |
gitnexus://repo/microsoft-agentic-harness/context | Codebase overview, check index freshness |
gitnexus://repo/microsoft-agentic-harness/clusters | All functional areas |
gitnexus://repo/microsoft-agentic-harness/processes | All execution flows |
gitnexus://repo/microsoft-agentic-harness/process/{name} | Step-by-step execution trace |
CLI
| Task | Read this skill file |
| Understand architecture / "How does X work?" | .claude/skills/gitnexus/gitnexus-exploring/SKILL.md |
| Blast radius / "What breaks if I change X?" | .claude/skills/gitnexus/gitnexus-impact-analysis/SKILL.md |
| Trace bugs / "Why is X failing?" | .claude/skills/gitnexus/gitnexus-debugging/SKILL.md |
| Rename / extract / split / refactor | .claude/skills/gitnexus/gitnexus-refactoring/SKILL.md |
| Tools, resources, schema reference | .claude/skills/gitnexus/gitnexus-guide/SKILL.md |
| Index, status, clean, wiki CLI commands | .claude/skills/gitnexus/gitnexus-cli/SKILL.md |
<!-- gitnexus:end -->Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

