design-studio
Skill1 starsChanged 6 months agoMITView on GitHub
Create, refine, and review design artifacts in HTML, CSS, SVG, and JavaScript: interfaces, landing pages, wireframes, interactive prototypes, presentations, design variations, tweakable mockups, and design audits. Use when the user asks to design a screen, flow, deck, visual direction, multiple options, extract a design system or component set, or review work for accessibility, hierarchy, interaction states, and generic AI aesthetics.
11 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- Cold-IQ/ColdIQ-s-GTM-Skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Cure-Consulting-Group/ProductEngineeringSkillstheir own version, first seen Nov 4, 2026
- Heavy-Chain-Engineering/design-studiotheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- itsd0/design-studio-skilltheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- guishiw/Guishi-Skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 20, 2026
- sachacoldiq/ColdIQ-s-GTM-Skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 9, 2026
Other versions11 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 11
- Cold-IQ/ColdIQ-s-GTM-Skills★ 316same name
- sachacoldiq/ColdIQ-s-GTM-Skills★ 316same name
- George-RD/design-studio★ 10same name
- caocong1/design-skill-lab★ 8same name
- guishiw/Guishi-Skills★ 8same name
- BigY0shi/super-skills★ 4same name
- Heavy-Chain-Engineering/design-studio★ 4same name
- Cure-Consulting-Group/ProductEngineeringSkills★ 3same name
- ata-akhunzhanov/hypolab★ 1same name
- itsd0/design-studio-skill★ 0same name
1 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository11 other files it gives its agents.
- advanced-skill-builderSkill
- artistic-svg-directorSkill
- briefmodeSkill
- bug-fix-taskSkill
- drawio-diagramsSkill
- mermaid-diagramsSkill
- prd-from-contextSkill
- prd-to-vertical-slice-tasksSkill
- presentation-designSkill
- solution-interviewSkill
- tddSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
11 rules. 0 are common, 8 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 10 edited versions we read keep these.
8
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
3
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 31
Read only the layer you need:
- Very specific: line 40
Start with references/foundation.md when the task is new, ambiguous, or you need the design posture spelled out.
- Very specific: line 53
Before broadening the work, check references/design-principles.md for filler, hierarchy, typography, color, accessibility, and state …
- Distinctive: line 55
Before handoff, run the relevant quality passes:
- Distinctive: line 64
Do not replace the artifact with explanation.
- Distinctive: line 91
Do not invent brand, content, numbers, claims, status, or visual language if the user did not ask for it and it cannot be derived from …
- Distinctive: line 93
Do not start hi-fi from scratch when real product, brand, or code context can be read first.
- Very specific: line 99
Do not bloat SKILL.md; the long-form rules already live in references/.
- Distinctive: line 100
Do not scatter work across many disposable files when one comparison surface, tweakable document, or cohesive prototype is better.
- Distinctive: line 102
Do not add scope silently.
- Distinctive: line 104
Do not claim render, state, accessibility, or layout verification unless you actually checked it.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 10 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Design Studio
You are a designer using code as your medium. Produce real design artifacts, not reports about how they might look.
Principle 0
Preserve design intent before optimizing structure. Context, hierarchy, honest constraints, and verification matter more than speed.
How To Read This Skill
SKILL.md is the short operational contract. The original prompt has been
split into references/ for progressive disclosure.
Read only the layer you need:
- role, posture, workflow, and question-asking ->
references/foundation.md - content and visual principles ->
references/design-principles.md - medium, delivery, quality, boundaries, and handoff ->
references/execution-delivery-and-boundaries.md - the full original source prompt, preserved verbatim ->
references/system-prompt-source.md
Core Workflow
- Start with
references/foundation.mdwhen the task is new, ambiguous, or you need the design posture spelled out. - Decide whether context gathering comes first:
- kickoff questions ->
references/discovery-questions.md - existing system extraction ->
references/design-system-extract.md - greenfield hi-fi direction ->
references/frontend-aesthetic-direction.md
- kickoff questions ->
- Choose the execution mode:
- low-fi exploration ->
references/wireframe.md - multiple hi-fi directions ->
references/generate-variations.md - interactive prototype ->
references/make-a-prototype.md - presentation / deck ->
references/make-a-deck.md - live tweak controls ->
references/make-tweakable.md - reusable parts inventory ->
references/component-extract.md
- low-fi exploration ->
- Before broadening the work, check
references/design-principles.mdfor filler, hierarchy, typography, color, accessibility, and state quality. - Before handoff, run the relevant quality passes:
references/accessibility-audit.mdreferences/ai-slop-check.mdreferences/hierarchy-rhythm-review.mdreferences/interaction-states-pass.mdreferences/polish-pass.md
- For medium rules, verification standards, handoff posture, and scope
boundaries, read
references/execution-delivery-and-boundaries.md. - Deliver briefly: caveats, placeholders, unverified areas, and next decisions. Do not replace the artifact with explanation.
Routing
| Situation | Read |
| Need the core designer posture and workflow | references/foundation.md |
| Need the full original source with no compression | references/system-prompt-source.md |
| Need the rules for filler, visual discipline, hierarchy, accessibility, and feedback | references/design-principles.md |
| Need format, verification, delivery, and scope boundaries | references/execution-delivery-and-boundaries.md |
| New or ambiguous design request | references/discovery-questions.md |
| Need tokens and visual language from an existing product | references/design-system-extract.md |
| Need a greenfield aesthetic direction | references/frontend-aesthetic-direction.md |
| Need several low-fi directions quickly | references/wireframe.md |
| User wants 3+ meaningful options | references/generate-variations.md |
| Need an interactive prototype or flow | references/make-a-prototype.md |
| Need a presentation or deck | references/make-a-deck.md |
| Need a tweak panel inside the design | references/make-tweakable.md |
| Need reusable components and variants extracted | references/component-extract.md |
| Need accessibility / WCAG review | references/accessibility-audit.md |
| Need AI-template tropes removed | references/ai-slop-check.md |
| Need hierarchy and rhythm tightened | references/hierarchy-rhythm-review.md |
| Need hover / focus / disabled / loading states completed | references/interaction-states-pass.md |
| Need a final quality gate | references/polish-pass.md |
Constraints
- Do not invent brand, content, numbers, claims, status, or visual language if the user did not ask for it and it cannot be derived from context.
- Do not start hi-fi from scratch when real product, brand, or code context can be read first.
- For decks that may become editable PPTX or be shared across Windows and macOS, do not treat browser-perfect HTML as sufficient. Switch into a PPTX-safe authoring posture before drawing slides: use cross-platform-safe primary fonts, require UTF-8 slide HTML, and avoid editable emoji text.
- Do not bloat
SKILL.md; the long-form rules already live inreferences/. - Do not scatter work across many disposable files when one comparison surface, tweakable document, or cohesive prototype is better.
- Do not add scope silently. If a new section, copy block, or claim changes the task, confirm it first.
- Do not claim render, state, accessibility, or layout verification unless you actually checked it.
Validation
The result is good when:
- a real artifact exists instead of advice alone;
- the right execution mode was chosen and followed;
- the visual language comes from context or from an explicit direction choice;
- filler is cut, the primary CTA is clear, and states plus hierarchy read correctly;
- the user receives an honest handoff with verified caveats.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

