agentleFS
LumosylvaLumosylva/lumosylva-skills/skills/project-execute/SKILL.md

project-execute

Skill1 starsChanged 10 days agoMITView on GitHub

Implements and verifies a presented final project plan within its authorized scope. Explicitly invoking project-execute approves the presented plan by default.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

5 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈3

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Check the approved checklist and the current worktree.

    line 12
  2. Distinctive:

    When confirmation is required, state the next action and pause.

    line 21
  3. Distinctive:

    Verify the implementation with relevant checks and report what ran, what passed, and what could not be verified.

    line 22
  4. Very specific:

    If a step cannot safely follow the plan, stop that step, explain the issue and request a revised plan.

    line 26
  5. Very specific:

    After all steps are complete, report the changes and verification.

    line 28

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Execute Mode

Use this skill only when the user explicitly invokes project-execute (including /project-execute if supported) and a final plan has been presented. By default, that invocation approves the presented plan. If the user rejects the plan, requests changes, or has not been shown a final plan, do not treat the invocation as approval; ask them to approve or revise the plan first. Start each response while active with [MODE: EXECUTE], then answer in the user's language.

Scope And Confirmations

  1. Check the approved checklist and the current worktree; preserve unrelated changes.
  2. Before starting implementation steps, persist the approved plan in a task file. Determine the project root in this order: use the Git worktree root containing the current working directory; otherwise use the single project/workspace root supplied by the client. If several roots are supplied and the target is ambiguous, ask the user to choose. If neither Git nor a single client root is available, use the current working directory. Inspect that root's .tasks/ directory and create it automatically when missing.
  3. Inspect the existing .tasks/ layout before choosing a file. Name the file YYYY-MM-DD_plan-xxx.md, using the current local date and a short plan identifier. Try a unique suffix when a candidate exists. Create the file with an exclusive no-overwrite operation; if another process creates that name first, choose another suffix and retry. Never rely on a separate existence check followed by an overwrite-capable write. If the available tools cannot create a file exclusively, stop before writing and record the blocker. Record the approved request and plan, approval status, scope, applicable interface and data conventions, verification items, the itemized execution checklist, and progress. Keep this task file as the execution record and update it as work proceeds.
  4. Execute only authorized steps, recording progress both in the task file and in the response. For each checklist item, record the checks needed to establish completion. Mark it complete only after its relevant checks pass, such as type checks, boundary checks, or other checks specified by the plan. Record check outcomes and blockers; leave an item incomplete when checks fail or remain unrun. Update the progress section after each item is verified and whenever execution is blocked or its status changes.
  5. Treat YOLO_MODE as a conversational preference for this project-execute invocation, not as an operating-system environment variable or persistent client setting. The user may select a non-default value by including YOLO_MODE=Ask or YOLO_MODE=On when explicitly invoking this skill. If omitted, use Off. Only the user may change the setting.
  6. Apply the selected confirmation boundary:
    • Off (default): Plan invocation approval does not replace step confirmations. Ask and wait for approval before starting each top-level item in the approved checklist. One approval covers the related changes already described by that item.
    • Ask: Ask and wait before each separately reviewable change group within an approved checklist item. A group includes all changes needed to deliver and verify one planned outcome, including directly related implementation, tests, and documentation across files. Split groups only when their outcomes have distinct acceptance criteria and can be delivered or reverted independently. Do not split by file, code line, or tool call. Read-only inspection and verification commands already authorized by the plan do not need separate step confirmations.
    • On: Continue through all steps in the approved plan without intermediate confirmations.
  7. When confirmation is required, state the next action and pause; do not perform it until the user approves. These are model-facing workflow instructions, not an enforcement mechanism. Client/tool permission prompts and separate authorization requirements still apply in every mode.
  8. Verify the implementation with relevant checks and report what ran, what passed, and what could not be verified.

The plan does not authorize out-of-scope improvements, branch creation, commits, pushes, destructive operations, or bypassing higher-priority tool permissions. Obtain explicit authorization for those actions separately.

If a step cannot safely follow the plan, stop that step, explain the issue and request a revised plan. The user must explicitly invoke project-plan to switch; do not change modes automatically. A "failure" response is feedback, not a mode switch.

After all steps are complete, report the changes and verification. Invite the user to invoke project-review for a separate review; do not enter review mode automatically. A "success" response alone is not a mode switch.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.