project-run
Skill0 starsChanged 6 months agoMITView on GitHub
Triggers: "let's start a client project", "set up a service engagement", "I need project management for this work", "start a project for [client]", "manage this as a client engagement", "I have a client brief" AskUserQuestion works only in the main thread. Subagents cannot ask the user anything, so all clarification happens in this conductor turn before dispatching or between project phases. project-run is the conversational entry point for the Project Manager Track — the opt-in layer for service-provider teams delivering…
In this repository45 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- plugin-v2/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- plugin-v2/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- .github/copilot-instructions.mdCopilot instructions
- .cursor/rules/agents.mdcCursor rule
- agentic-security-reviewSkill
- arc42-baselineSkill
- caveman-commitSkill
- caveman-helpSkill
- caveman-reviewSkill
- cavemanSkill
- create-goalSkill
- design-twiceSkill
- discovery-sprintSkill
- domain-contextSkill
- github-project-setupSkill
- grillSkill
- improve-codebase-architectureSkill
- issue-breakdownSkill
- issue-draftSkill
- issue-pr-syncSkill
- new-adrSkill
- new-glossary-entrySkill
- orchestrateSkill
- portfolio-trackSkill
- product-pageSkill
- project-reviewSkill
- project-scaffoldingSkill
- quality-assuranceSkill
- quality-metricsSkill
- record-decisionSkill
- review-fixSkill
- roadmap-managementSkill
- sales-cycleSkill
- specorator-designSkill
- specorator-improvementSkill
- specorator-onboardSkill
- stock-takingSkill
- tackle-issueSkill
- tdd-cycleSkill
- token-budget-reviewSkill
- tracer-bulletSkill
- ubiquitous-languageSkill
- verifySkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
22 rules. About 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 17 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈5
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
17
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 40
Ask the user to describe the engagement in one paragraph: who is the client, what are they getting, when, and at what cost (if known).
- Distinctive: line 42
Ask for a project slug (engagement-level name, not solution name).
- Distinctive: line 47
Ask the user to share the client brief, statement of work, or scope description.
- Very specific: line 48
Run /project:initiate — the project-manager agent will draft the four management documents and produce a go/no-go decision brief.
- Very specific: line 54
Ask: "Are there existing features (specs/) to link, or do we need to start new ones?"
- Very specific: line 55
If yes: record the specs/<slug>/ paths in project-description.md's deliverables section.
- Very specific: line 56
If no: recommend /spec:start <feature-slug> for each deliverable, then /project:initiate after to link them.
- Distinctive: line 57
Ask: "Do you have a known client communication cadence (weekly, bi-weekly)?
- Very specific: line 62
Run /project:close — the agent will draft the closure document and ask for sponsor sign-off.
- Distinctive: line 67
If the user mentions a new client request, out-of-scope work, or an unexpected scope change:
- Very specific: line 74
Before each phase, read projects/<slug>/project-state.md:
- Very specific: line 75
If phase: scaffolded → Phase 1 (initiation pending)
- Very specific: line 76
If phase: executing → Phase 2 (check if weekly log is current)
- Very specific: line 77
If phase: closing → Phase 3 (closure in progress)
- Very specific: line 78
If phase: closed → remind user about /project:post
- Very specific: line 80
If no project-state.md exists: run Phase 0 + Phase 1.
- Very specific: line 86
Never do project-manager work in your own turn.
- Very specific: line 87
Never call AskUserQuestion from inside a subagent prompt.
- Very specific: line 88
Never ask more than one AskUserQuestion per gate.
- Very specific: line 89
Use the project-specific state model in projects/<slug>/project-state.md: phase, initiation_status, closure_status, and last_updated.
- Very specific: line 90
Never write directly to projects/<slug>/ during normal phase execution.
- Very specific: line 94
If project-manager returns "blocked — needs human input", surface its question to the user via a single AskUserQuestion, capture the …
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
project-run — Project Manager Track conductor
Triggers: "let's start a client project", "set up a service engagement", "I need project management for this work", "start a project for [client]", "manage this as a client engagement", "I have a client brief"
AskUserQuestion works only in the main thread. Subagents cannot ask the user anything, so all clarification happens in this conductor turn before dispatching or between project phases.
What this skill does
project-run is the conversational entry point for the Project Manager Track — the opt-in layer for service-provider teams delivering software to clients. It guides the user through the full project lifecycle: initiation → execution (weekly rhythm) → closure → post-project evaluation.
It sequences specialist commands (/project:*) and gates with AskUserQuestion at every human-decision point (go/no-go, change approval, sign-off).
This skill does not drive Specorator feature work (/spec:*) or Discovery Track sprints (/discovery:*) — it coordinates them from the project management layer.
When to run
Run when:
- A client engagement is starting and governance is needed.
- The user says they have a statement of work, contract, or client brief.
- Multiple features need to be coordinated under a single delivery commitment.
- Scope, schedule, budget, or stakeholder reporting are concerns.
Do not run when:
- The user is building an internal product with no client.
- There is no contract boundary.
- The user just wants to run a feature — recommend
/spec:startinstead. - The user has a blank page and needs ideation first — recommend
/discovery:startinstead.
Procedure
Phase 0 — Orientation
- Intake gate. Before asking the user to describe the engagement, list
inputs/non-recursively and surface every item via a singleAskUserQuestion: "I see N items ininputs/. Which are relevant for this engagement?" Ifinputs/is empty, print one line ("inputs/is empty — no source material to consult") and proceed. Never auto-extract zips or archives — extraction is a separate, explicitly approved step. Cite paths intoinputs/fromproject-description.mdand other canonical artifacts. Full contract:docs/inputs-ingestion.md. Decision: ADR-0017. - Ask the user to describe the engagement in one paragraph: who is the client, what are they getting, when, and at what cost (if known).
- Confirm the user wants the full project management layer (not just a Specorator feature). If they're uncertain, explain the difference (see
docs/project-track.md§1). - Ask for a project slug (engagement-level name, not solution name). Suggest corrections if needed.
Phase 1 — Bootstrap and Initiation
- Run
/project:start <slug>. - Ask the user to share the client brief, statement of work, or scope description. Accept any format (prose, email, bullet list, doc path).
- Run
/project:initiate— theproject-manageragent will draft the four management documents and produce a go/no-go decision brief. - Present the go/no-go brief. Ask the user (acting as sponsor): "Do you approve initiating this project?" Gate on approval before advancing.
Phase 2 — Execution rhythm
- Recommend: "Run
/project:weeklyeach week. I'll read all linked featureworkflow-state.mdfiles and produce a weekly log entry with RAG status." - Ask: "Are there existing features (
specs/) to link, or do we need to start new ones?"- If yes: record the
specs/<slug>/paths inproject-description.md's deliverables section. - If no: recommend
/spec:start <feature-slug>for each deliverable, then/project:initiateafter to link them.
- If yes: record the
- Ask: "Do you have a known client communication cadence (weekly, bi-weekly)? I'll include focused-comms notes in the weekly log."
Phase 3 — Closure (when user signals project end)
- Confirm all deliverables have been accepted or explicitly deferred.
- Run
/project:close— the agent will draft the closure document and ask for sponsor sign-off. - Recommend: "Set a reminder to run
/project:postin 3–6 months to evaluate whether the expected benefits were realised."
At any point — change control
If the user mentions a new client request, out-of-scope work, or an unexpected scope change:
- Prompt: "This sounds like a change request. Want me to run
/project:changeto log and assess it?"
State reading
Before each phase, read projects/<slug>/project-state.md:
- If
phase: scaffolded→ Phase 1 (initiation pending) - If
phase: executing→ Phase 2 (check if weekly log is current) - If
phase: closing→ Phase 3 (closure in progress) - If
phase: closed→ remind user about/project:post
If no project-state.md exists: run Phase 0 + Phase 1.
Constraints
- Never do project-manager work in your own turn. Drafting the project description, registers, reports, closure, or post-project evaluation belongs to
/project:*commands and theproject-manageragent. - Never call
AskUserQuestionfrom inside a subagent prompt. - Never ask more than one
AskUserQuestionper gate. Batch choices into a single question. - Use the project-specific state model in
projects/<slug>/project-state.md:phase,initiation_status,closure_status, andlast_updated. Do not use genericstatus: active | paused | blockedtransitions for this track. - Never write directly to
projects/<slug>/during normal phase execution. The/project:*commands andproject-managerown those files; this conductor reads state, asks the user, and dispatches.
When a project phase escalates
If project-manager returns "blocked — needs human input", surface its question to the user via a single AskUserQuestion, capture the answer, and re-dispatch the same /project:* command with the answer as additional context. Do not answer on the user's behalf.
References
- Methodology:
docs/project-track.md - ADR:
docs/adr/0008-add-project-manager-track.md - Agent:
.claude/agents/project-manager.md - Commands:
.claude/commands/project/(start, initiate, weekly, change, report, close, post) - Templates:
templates/project-state-template.md+templates/project-description-template.md+templates/deliverables-map-template.md+templates/followup-register-template.md+templates/health-register-template.md
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

