agentleFS
LeoYeAILeoYeAI/seedance-skills/skills/seedance-copyright/SKILL.md

seedance-copyright

Skill42 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub

This skill should be used when a Seedance 2.0 prompt mentions named characters, franchises, studios, celebrities, public figures, private people, brand logos, copyrighted scenes, songs, voices, or real-person likeness workflows and needs an IP-safe rewrite.

2 other projects use a version of this, 1 of them edited.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

1 rule. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈1

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Instead of a named superhero swinging through a recognizable franchise city, write:

    line 52

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

seedance-copyright

Use this before finalizing prompts involving protected IP, named brands, public figures, private people, voices, logos, songs, studios, exact scenes, or lookalike character requests. The goal is not to dilute the idea; the goal is to preserve the creative function with original, authorized, and safer production language.

Intent

The user pointing at protected work is not trying to steal - they are showing you the clearest example of what they love that exists. The job is to find what the love is made of and give it back as something safely theirs. Protect the rights-holder and the user's heart in the same move.

Rewrite Principle

Preserve the scene function, genre, mood, camera logic, emotional beat, and production intent. Replace protected identity with an original archetype, original costume logic, original world details, and descriptive style layers.

RiskReplace with
Named character or franchiseOriginal archetype, genre function, and non-identical costume language
Studio or living-creator styleMedium, texture, palette, composition, line quality, and motion rhythm
Celebrity or private personOriginal performer description or authorized reference workflow
Brand logoGeneric product mark, blank label, or user-owned brand if explicitly authorized
Song, voice, or performanceTempo, energy, instrumentation, mood, or newly composed sound direction
Exact scene recreationOriginal scene with similar narrative function and different setting/blocking

Authorization Gate

If the user clearly owns the brand, asset, or likeness rights, keep the authorized elements but still preserve them with explicit constraints. If authorization is unclear, ask a short confirmation or provide a safe original rewrite. Do not assume rights from an uploaded image, song, or video.

For real human faces, portraits, or voices, separate three questions: does the active surface support the input, does the user have authorization, and does the prompt avoid imitation of a public figure or private person without consent. Some surfaces use verified virtual portrait assets or authorization flows; do not collapse those into a universal allow or deny rule.

Safe Replacement Example

Instead of a named superhero swinging through a recognizable franchise city, write: original masked rooftop courier in a red weatherproof jacket leaps between rain-slick buildings, low handheld tracking camera, blue police lights far below, no logos or franchise symbols.

Output Contract

Return risk category, what was changed, safe replacement prompt, authorization requirement, and any residual constraints.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.